13:00:44 #startmeeting FZUG 13:00:44 Meeting started Fri Mar 10 13:00:44 2017 UTC. The chair is zsun. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:44 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:00:44 The meeting name has been set to 'fzug' 13:00:45 [2010-08-20 22:18:24] Posted by z/odbot@fedora-zh already: MeetBot - Debian Wiki 13:00:47 #topic Roll Call 13:00:56 #chair gbraad bexelbie 13:00:56 Current chairs: bexelbie gbraad zsun 13:01:03 .hellomynameis zsun 13:01:04 zsun: zsun 'None' 13:01:12 .hello bex 13:01:13 bexelbie: bex 'Brian (bex) Exelbierd' 13:01:15 .hello gbraad 13:01:16 gbraad: gbraad 'Gerard Braad (吉拉德)' 13:01:33 let's get to topic now 13:01:41 #topic LinuxCon Beijing 13:02:19 bexelbie: some info for the email, as I say, the Red Hatters will not talk on behalf of Fedora 13:02:31 I read that too 13:02:35 I understand 13:02:41 while we have no actual updates for this week currently 13:03:23 In roughly 2 week the Fedora Council has a FAD 13:03:29 and they want to talk about target audiences 13:03:29 we do what we can... 13:03:39 perhaps we should delay action on planning until they are done 13:03:41 a virtual FAD ? 13:03:47 and see how we can translate those goals to China 13:03:53 gbraad, it is actually in person 13:04:00 oh additional, mosquito don't want to deliver a talk 13:04:16 OK, will this affect what we currently do? 13:04:31 gbraad, it can if we choose to let it 13:04:49 likely not negative... but positive I guess... 13:05:00 It could give us some guidance on the overall project's goals and then we can figure out how that affects China and if this conference can help us achieve them 13:05:09 I don't see it as negative in any situation, either neutral or positive 13:05:54 OK. is there anything we can contribute or suggest? 13:06:52 I think anything we wanted to send them as far as what we think is good for the Project and China would be considered, but otherwise I don't know 13:07:32 well, do we need to send them this? or is it represented by one of us... 13:07:50 I think it is represented in the sense that the council is represented 13:07:54 I don't think there is any obligation 13:08:05 I was just thinking that the outcome of that conversation might help us scope our conversation 13:08:59 OK, sure. understand 13:09:56 in that regard, I also believe this meeting can be short ;-) 13:10:23 IMO we want to wait for the outcome of Council vFAD ? 13:10:41 * zsun kind of struggling in English language itself 13:10:41 -v 13:11:42 if so, basically we agree on no talks there? 13:11:50 I mean for LinuxCon 13:12:40 "for the moment" would be the answer 13:13:13 I think it is ok, if we don't have any planned talks. If we can get one organically that would be great 13:13:24 I need to re-read the CFP and see if there is a topic I can present on that is useful/appropriate 13:13:33 gbraad: CfP ends 18th. 13:13:37 yes 13:13:47 consider the 17th (Friday) 13:13:51 yes 13:13:53 due to timezones... 13:14:07 although they are in our favour... 13:14:19 so if basically yes, I am released from struggling for RPM packaging then ;-) 13:14:29 :D 13:15:22 will be moving between appartments again. BRB 13:16:12 gbraad: a bad talk is even worse than no talks IMO. I don't want to make it bad 13:16:27 zsun: agree 13:17:12 +1 to no bad talks 13:19:30 so any more to discuss today? 13:20:18 no 13:22:47 not from me 13:22:51 sorry for delay 13:25:40 sorry I lost Internet connection 13:25:58 in that case, we can end the meeting 13:26:39 if bexelbie have nothing more, sure 13:26:40 let's look forward to the result of the Council FAD 13:26:57 bexelbie said he had nothing 13:26:59 #stopmeeting 13:27:07 but please help me #endmeeting 13:27:15 #endmeeting