06:00:15 #startmeeting g11n(i18n focused) 06:00:15 Meeting started Wed May 11 06:00:15 2016 UTC. The chair is pravins. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 06:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 06:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'g11n(i18n_focused)' 06:00:20 #meetingname g11n(i18n focused) 06:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'g11n(i18n_focused)' 06:00:24 #topic agenda and roll call 06:00:29 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2016-05-11 06:00:30 hi 06:00:32 hi.. 06:00:35 hi 06:00:36 hi tagoh_ suanand :) 06:00:42 hi 06:00:57 hi 06:01:01 hi juhp ueno paragan :) 06:01:08 #chair tagoh_ suanand ueno juhp paragan 06:01:08 Current chairs: juhp paragan pravins suanand tagoh_ ueno 06:01:22 Hi! 06:01:28 hi mfabian :) 06:01:30 #chair mfabian 06:01:30 Current chairs: juhp mfabian paragan pravins suanand tagoh_ ueno 06:01:53 Lets see upcoming schedule 06:01:58 #topic Upcoming schedule 06:01:59 #info 2016-05-31 Final Freeze (*) 06:01:59 #info 2016-06-14 Fedora 23 Final Release 06:02:22 hi 06:02:31 As you might have seen already, Beta released yesterday. 06:02:35 https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-24-beta-released/ 06:03:00 Now for final freeze only around 3 weeks remaining, should put more time in testing F24 now. 06:03:16 * pravins going to update stable machine to Fedora 24 today. :) 06:03:27 more F24 Beta !! 06:03:32 hi epico :) 06:03:35 #chair epico 06:03:35 Current chairs: epico juhp mfabian paragan pravins suanand tagoh_ ueno 06:03:58 hey 06:04:15 hi satya4ever_ :) 06:04:55 moving to next topic 06:05:09 #topic #36: gnome redesign plans for control-center Region and Languages 06:05:25 unfortunately Anish not able to do anything on this for Fedora 24. 06:05:40 We need someone to take over on this bugs. 06:05:45 Anyone interested? 06:06:06 It basically disabling XKB Indic imes in gnome. 06:07:01 umm 7month no update :) 06:07:36 pravins: I don’t remember exactly, but it was mainly moving them from one fine to another in /usr/X11/xkb, wasn’t it? 06:07:47 yes. 06:08:04 mfabian: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756939 06:08:47 is there a patch? 06:08:54 no. 06:09:06 juhp: I think it would be quite easy to make a patch, but 06:09:13 mfabian, great 06:09:14 juhp: should it go upstream? 06:09:23 I think so 06:09:24 under this initiative we had number of discussion and idea. May be we should create few more ticket from discussions in this ticket. 06:09:26 It would be a patch against xorg. 06:10:45 mfabian@ari:/usr/share/X11/xkb/rules 06:10:45 $ rpm -qf base.xml 06:10:45 xkeyboard-config-2.16-2.fc23.noarch 06:10:45 mfabian@ari:/usr/share/X11/xkb/rules 06:10:48 $ rpm -qf base.extras.xml 06:10:49 I think the ticket is too terse though 06:10:51 xkeyboard-config-2.16-2.fc23.noarch 06:10:54 mfabian@ari:/usr/share/X11/xkb/rules 06:10:58 $ 06:11:02 06:11:05 Moving them from base.xml to base.extras.xml. 06:11:21 I can make a patch for the Fedora package ... 06:11:27 mfabian, I am not sure we want to remove the keymaps completely - I think the idea was to filter them from the g-c-c? 06:11:45 right, blacklist them. 06:11:51 juhp: They are not removed if they are listed in base.extras.xml 06:11:57 They are still usuable. 06:11:57 ah 06:12:01 okay 06:12:06 that should okay then 06:12:09 be 06:12:15 But gnome-control-centre ignores everything which is in "extras". 06:12:27 mfabian, cool - I think still it could be upstreamed though 06:12:36 I will do some cleanup on ticket and open new ticket if there are any ideas in discussions. 06:12:41 I don't think it should be so fedora specific 06:12:58 +1 for upstream. 06:13:08 but we probably need some info/references in the bug to justify the change 06:13:20 juhp: It might be gnome specific, I have no idea whether the other desktops list the stuff in "extras" or not. 06:13:27 There was some discussion on mailing list for this. 06:13:34 ah not that that bug then - so se need a new FDO bug? 06:13:47 pravins, aha 06:14:07 mfabian, maybe doesn't matter? 06:14:26 juhp: Yes, I also think this doesn't matter much. 06:14:33 I mean if they do, then no change for them, and if they don't it is probably the desirable behaviour anyway? 06:15:01 maybe we could test kde? 06:16:00 mfabian, filing a patch sounds good anyway :-) 06:16:10 OK, I’ll make a patch today. 06:16:17 great. thanks mfabian :) 06:16:20 mfabian ++ 06:16:33 mfabian++ 06:16:33 juhp: Karma for mfabian changed to 3 (for the f23 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 06:16:52 #action mfabian will create patch to blacklist xkb indic maps. 06:17:02 #action pravins to update ticket and make it to the point. 06:17:19 #topic #57: Fedora 24 change planning 06:17:25 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/57 06:17:57 I think more important point here is now to check Changes are properly documented in release notes and article. 06:19:43 hmm, i dont see glibc subpackaging on first page of https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-24-beta-released/ 06:20:30 It should come to "Fedora-Wide Changes" 06:23:57 Will come back to this again :) 06:24:16 #topic #58: Prioritizing bugs for Fedora 24 release 06:24:22 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/58 06:24:51 We have now completed most of the tasks for F24. Lets do some bug triaging today. 06:25:10 As you know bugs are listed in meeting dashboard. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2016-05-11 06:25:52 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&f1=OP&f2=assigned_to&f3=cc&f5=keywords&f6=CP&j1=OR&list_id=5099639&o2=substring&o3=substring&o5=substring&product=Fedora&v2=i18n-bugs%40lists.fedoraproject.org&v3=i18n-bugs%40lists.fedoraproject.org&v5=i18n&version=23 06:26:13 .bug 862367 06:26:14 pravins: Bug 862367 'Ctrl + Space' not working, ibus frontend for fbterm does not show up - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/862367 06:26:46 This one is assigned to dchen, fujiwarat is this bug still exists? 06:27:40 lots of bugs on my side as well. liberation-fonts and lohit-*-fonts :( 06:28:18 Rawhide bugs 06:28:20 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&f1=OP&f2=assigned_to&f3=cc&f5=keywords&f6=CP&j1=OR&list_id=5099810&o2=substring&o3=substring&o5=substring&product=Fedora&v2=i18n-bugs%40lists.fedoraproject.org&v3=i18n-bugs%40lists.fedoraproject.org&v5=i18n&version=rawhide 06:28:49 pravins: I closed that bug now. 06:29:22 fujiwarat: excellent, thanks :) 06:31:48 .bug 1087448 06:31:49 pravins: Bug 1087448 RFE: ibus-typing-booster keybinding customization - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1087448 06:32:12 Tab key is conflicting with terminal tab completion feature. 06:33:17 Lots of stuff in the terminal does not work while i-t-b is active. Mostly that cannot be fixed. But the keys should be configurable ... 06:33:43 Do we recommend i-t-b in terminal? ;) 06:33:55 Depends on what you do in the terminal. 06:34:07 I would not use it for programming. 06:34:09 good one !! 06:34:30 but if you use some irc client in a terminal or type some text with vi, then it is useful. 06:35:01 yes, in that case user can enable it after starting vi or irc in terminal. 06:35:13 I guess it conflicts with shell not terminal?? 06:35:16 and then it should not conflict. 06:35:21 nod 06:36:32 it looks not fixable issue :) 06:36:47 pravins: The conflict with the shell is not really fixable. 06:37:00 But the keybindings should be configurable in future, I plan to do this. 06:37:22 fujiwara also writes in that bug: “xfce4-terminal has the black background and I feel the preedit attributes are not needed.” 06:37:39 He is certainly right there, the dark blue preëdit makes it unusable on dark backgrounds. 06:38:11 I should fix that immediately, it is so annoying ... 06:38:28 great. 06:38:47 one thing is clear to me. We need bug triaging activity soon. 06:39:00 How to you think for spending whole next meeting on bug triaging? 06:39:26 if few urgent topic, we can add them. 06:40:36 #chair 06:40:37 Current chairs: epico juhp mfabian paragan pravins suanand tagoh_ ueno 06:41:57 If no objection, lets invest more time for bug triaging next time. 06:43:23 lets move ahead. 06:43:23 yep, we are interested in bug triaging 06:43:36 Satya: sure, will do that. We have lots of bugs :) 06:43:46 #topic #61: FTBFS bugs for Rawhide 06:43:47 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/61 06:43:53 3 bugs are still open 06:44:17 .bug 1308190 06:44:18 pravins: Bug 1308190 tomoe-gtk: FTBFS in rawhide - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1308190 06:44:36 aha, nice this is fixed now. 06:44:48 so only, 2 bugs remaining 06:44:57 .bug 1307714 06:44:58 pravins: Bug 1307714 libUnihan: FTBFS in rawhide - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1307714 06:45:25 .bug 1308194 06:45:26 pravins: Bug 1308194 translate-toolkit: FTBFS in rawhide - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1308194 06:45:34 If anyone interested, feel free to look into it :) 06:45:45 moving to next topic 06:45:51 #topic #62: F24 Documentation beat 06:45:51 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/62 06:46:03 I gone through few bugs and found some release notes for i18n. 06:46:07 Reported bug yesterday https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334305 06:46:15 .bug 1334305 06:46:16 pravins: Bug 1334305 Fedora 24 Release notes content for Internationalization - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1334305 06:48:13 please check Notes at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334305#c0 and feel free to improve/add. 06:48:39 moving to next topic 06:48:45 #topic #21: Language installation not working in Rawhide 06:48:45 #link https://fedorahosted.org/G11N/ticket/21 06:49:07 puiterwijk: reported this one week back, somehow missed this in last meeting. 06:50:39 is that true for f24 too?? 06:51:03 juhp: I didn't test F24 yet. I can do that later today 06:51:29 nope, F24 it works fine. 06:52:33 well I have already told dnf-langpacks plugin need not be removed from Fedora 06:53:18 probably missed to update all the referenced on wiki pages 06:53:35 I will find such references and update them to new langpacks Change 06:54:04 puiterwijk, ah langinstall! 06:54:07 paragan: then what is the current way to install langpacks? 06:54:24 Should we update glibc subpackages to groupinstall japanese-support? 06:54:27 puiterwijk, you just need to install langpack-ja and things should work I believe 06:54:31 Its deprecated though. 06:54:34 juhp: yes, either dnf groupinstall language-support and dnf langinstall 06:54:38 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_langpacks_packages 06:56:15 puiterwijk, Please use commands from above page for langpacks 06:56:45 paragan: will try to do that and update my ticket. But if that's the current way, the user-facing documentation really needs updating 06:56:46 paragan: make sense, one of the intention behind langpacks is to remove language-groups from comps. 06:57:06 (sorry langpacks-ja) 06:57:20 puiterwijk, sure I am updating now wiki pages 06:57:26 great 06:57:44 Great, thanks. I really couldn't figure out what to do otherwise 06:57:54 sure, lets update ticket for now. 06:58:15 #action paragan to update Wiki pages with user-facing documentation. 06:58:27 moving to next ticket 06:58:31 #topic Live media with langpacks included 06:58:32 #link https://fedorahosted.org/G11N/ticket/17 06:58:39 paragan: should we make any noise about this? 06:59:25 at least, i will comment on ticket :) 06:59:35 moving to last topic 06:59:36 feel free to do that 06:59:36 #topic Open Floor 06:59:47 Almost on time today !! 06:59:52 anything we missed? 07:00:25 #info Next i18n meeting will be more on bug triaging side. 07:00:37 if nothing else lets close meeting in 2 minutes.. 07:01:48 thank you all for the meeting :) 07:01:52 #endmeeting