12:01:17 <hagarth> #startmeeting
12:01:17 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Dec  3 12:01:17 2014 UTC.  The chair is hagarth. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:01:17 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
12:01:32 <hagarth> agenda - https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-community-meetings
12:01:40 <hagarth> #topic roll call
12:01:44 <hagarth> who do we have here today?
12:01:50 * ndevos is here
12:02:00 * jdarcy is
12:02:08 * raghu` is here
12:02:49 * partner observ ing
12:02:55 <hagarth> I think this is enough to constitute quorum for today :)
12:03:03 <hagarth> #topic Action Items from last meeting
12:03:06 * kkeithley is here
12:03:22 <hagarth> reschedule bitrot session
12:04:01 <hagarth> this was done yesterday - we will have the hangout link sent on MLs soon
12:04:23 <hagarth> Discuss stabiity issues and directions
12:04:43 <hagarth> we need to convene a separate meeting for this one - let us carry forward this to a meeting when davemc is here
12:04:58 <hagarth> AI - hagarth to set up small file performance meeting
12:05:13 <hagarth> jdarcy: would you be setting up this meeting?
12:05:47 <jdarcy> Yep, now that Ben has filled out the feature requests I think we have a good amount of material to discuss.
12:05:59 <hagarth> cool, I will punt the AI over to you
12:06:09 <hagarth> #action jdarcy to set up small file performance meeting
12:06:23 <hagarth> AI - davemc to chat semiosis on ubuntu release
12:06:38 <hagarth> not sure if this happened, we will wait to hear from davemc on this one
12:06:52 <hagarth> AI - follow up on Rackspace regressions
12:07:06 <hagarth> there are still a few annoying spurious regressions on rackspace
12:07:18 <hagarth> mgmt_v3_locks being one of them
12:07:29 <hagarth> atinmu is looking into this one
12:07:42 <hagarth> Emmanuel is looking into a bunch of issues
12:07:55 <ndevos> Emmanuel rocks!
12:07:58 <hagarth> help with patches and reviews would be welcome
12:08:00 <ndevos> (and atinmu too)
12:08:19 * hagarth wonders if Emmanuel can be the maintainer for tests/ too
12:08:51 <hagarth> those were the AIs from last week
12:08:53 <hagarth> moving on
12:08:57 <hagarth> #topic Gluster 3.6
12:09:02 <hagarth> raghu`: all yours
12:09:41 <raghu`> I looked at the 3.6.2 tracker bug. For some bugs patches have been submitted
12:10:04 <raghu`> I am looking at them and added some reviewers for some patches.
12:10:21 <hagarth> 3.6 review backlog is here - http://review.gluster.org/#/q/status:open+project:glusterfs+branch:release-3.6,n,z
12:10:31 <raghu`> Have pushed some patches. I planning to make 3.6.2 next week
12:11:03 <hagarth> raghu`: cool, do we know if pending afr heal related issues would be addressed in 3.6.2?
12:11:25 <raghu`> Want to release a beta version at the end of this week. Some patches while pushing had merge conflicts. So waiting for them
12:11:35 <hagarth> raghu`: ok
12:11:42 <ndevos> raghu`: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?maxdepth=1&hide_resolved=1&id=glusterfs-3.6.2 lists quite some bugs
12:11:50 <ndevos> raghu`: is that list current?
12:12:20 <raghu`> yeah. Thats the one I am referring to.
12:12:29 <ndevos> ah, good :)
12:13:07 <raghu`> That list contains mostly erasure code related bugs or gfapi related issues (versioning them etc).
12:13:34 <hagarth> raghu`: what other improvements are expected in 3.6.2?
12:14:05 <hagarth> rdma and uss?
12:14:11 <raghu`> I am expecting some USS releated patches to be backported from master.
12:14:32 <hagarth> raghu`: ok
12:14:34 <kkeithley> fix the build on Mac OS X? (no symbol versions)
12:14:51 <hagarth> kkeithley: add it to the tracker perhaps?
12:15:06 <kkeithley> I think it is in the tracker already, isn't it?
12:15:11 * hagarth checks
12:15:29 <raghu`> kkeithley: are you referring to this? http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9169/
12:15:46 <raghu`> if so, I have pushed it.
12:15:52 <kkeithley> yes, okay, good
12:15:59 <hagarth> okay cool
12:16:18 <hagarth> anything more on 3.6?
12:16:53 <hagarth> guess not, so moving on
12:17:04 <raghu`> I have added niels as reviewer for this http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9145/. Niels can you please review it?
12:17:19 <ndevos> raghu`: sure
12:17:29 <hagarth> #topic 3.5
12:17:59 <ndevos> nothing to report?
12:18:15 <hagarth> anything updated in 3.5.4 tracker?
12:18:38 <hagarth> we seem to have a few bugs in open state there
12:18:39 <ndevos> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?maxdepth=1&hide_resolved=1&id=glusterfs-3.5.4
12:19:09 <ndevos> yes, a few are open, they need patches review/merged in master and 3.6
12:19:20 <hagarth> ndevos: any tentative ETA for 3.5.4?
12:19:28 <ndevos> I'm not sure if I should require inclusion in 3.6 before I merge them in 3.5
12:19:41 <ndevos> kkeithley: what do you use as rule for that? ^
12:20:10 <ndevos> hagarth: not really, nobody screemed loud enough for a 3.5.4 yet
12:20:26 <hagarth> ndevos: ok
12:20:40 <hagarth> ndevos: I think inclusion in master should be good enough for 3.5
12:20:49 <kkeithley> depends. Usually I just wait for it in master.
12:21:18 <kkeithley> are you referring to the Mac OS X symbol versions, or just generally?
12:21:52 <ndevos> kkeithley: any bugfix, should is be posted or merged in 3.6 before I include it in 3.5?
12:21:59 <ndevos> s/is/it/
12:22:48 <ndevos> at the very minimal, I want to see a patch posted for 3.6 too, merging can then be done later - I think
12:23:11 <hagarth> ndevos: I like that idea
12:23:13 <kkeithley> I think that's not unreasonable.
12:23:41 <hagarth> if we are pulling something into 3.5, there is no reason to not have it in 3.6
12:23:46 <ndevos> okay, I'll stick with that then
12:23:46 <hagarth> unless it is specific to 3.5
12:23:55 * ndevos kicks AFR
12:23:57 * kkeithley thinks it hard enough as it is to get patches reviewed and merged. We shouldn't make it harder than it needs to be
12:24:55 <hagarth> kkeithley: +1 to that
12:24:59 <ndevos> so, if nobody needs a 3.5.4 any time soon, I dont schedule a beta for it yet
12:25:40 <ndevos> next topic?
12:25:40 <hagarth> all seems to be hunky dory with 3.5.3 then
12:25:48 <hagarth> yes, let us move on
12:25:52 <hagarth> #topic 3.4
12:26:22 <kkeithley> nothing to report there. I haven't had any cycles to look for the memory leak
12:26:35 <kkeithley> $dayjob
12:26:56 <hagarth> kkeithley: right, let us ping JoeJulian on that one
12:27:10 <hagarth> I am interested in understanding about the memory leak in 3.4
12:27:23 <kkeithley> And I don't think anyone has looked at the leak on the longevity cluster
12:27:43 <hagarth> kkeithley: can you mail me the details of your setup? I will take a look into that
12:27:58 * ndevos makes note to self: need memleak fixes? ping JoeJulian.
12:27:59 <kkeithley> I can switch the longevity cluster to 3.4. if that's useful.
12:28:04 <kkeithley> yes, I'll send you the details
12:28:26 <hagarth> kkeithley: ok
12:29:05 <hagarth> kkeithley: no ETA for the next 3.4.x release right?
12:29:32 <kkeithley> memory leak is the main issue for 3.4.x as far as I'm concerned
12:29:39 <kkeithley> so no, no ETA
12:29:49 <hagarth> kkeithley: ok
12:29:50 <kkeithley> until we have addressed the memory leak
12:29:54 <ndevos> is that 3.4.6?
12:30:04 <hagarth> updating that in the etherpad
12:30:21 <kkeithley> one sec
12:30:29 <hagarth> ndevos: 3.4.7 me thinks
12:30:44 <kkeithley> next is 3.4.7
12:30:54 <ndevos> right, then https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?maxdepth=1&hide_resolved=1&id=glusterfs-3.4.6 needs some updating
12:32:14 <hagarth> anything else on 3.4?
12:32:42 <hagarth> guess not, let us move on
12:32:50 <kkeithley> nope
12:32:57 <hagarth> #topic Gluster next
12:33:04 <hagarth> bitrot hangout happened yesterday
12:33:18 <hagarth> after several teething problems to get it going :)
12:33:37 <hagarth> hangout #link - https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VenkyShankar13/posts/MjzrCyMZ9UV?cfem=1
12:33:46 <jdarcy> Ben has done some excellent work helping to flesh out the small-file-perf feature pages.
12:34:04 <jdarcy> I sent out a proposal for some 4.0-related volume/brick management changes.
12:34:24 <hagarth> jdarcy: that's fantastic, when would we want to hold a meeting on small-file-perf? I am interested in doing a few improvements in 3.7 too.
12:34:30 <jdarcy> We should probably schedule an online meeting next week so everyone can catch up and plan what to do next.
12:34:51 <jdarcy> That's separate meetings for small-file and 4.0 BTW.
12:34:57 <hagarth> jdarcy: the week after might be better. Most folks here will be busy with $dayjob meetings next week.
12:35:07 <jdarcy> OK.
12:35:25 <hagarth> jdarcy: +2 to the meetings
12:35:49 <jdarcy> I certainly hope we can get some of those small-file improvements in before 4.x
12:35:56 <hagarth> #action jdarcy to schedule a meeting on 4.0
12:36:37 <hagarth> certainly, I cringe whenever I run a git clone on a glusterfs mount :)
12:36:58 <hagarth> btw features for 3.7 are getting added
12:37:17 <hagarth> #link - http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Planning37
12:37:31 <hagarth> please add your feature proposals there
12:37:40 <ndevos> I think Emanuel compiles NetBSD on a glusterfs mount? he would be happy with improved small-files too :D
12:37:51 <hagarth> ndevos: yeah
12:38:31 <hagarth> anything more on gluster.next?
12:38:49 <jdarcy> Not from me.  Still plowing through the volgen code so I can rewrite it properly.
12:38:53 <hagarth> I plan to schedule a meeting sometime in January to review where we are with respect to 3.7
12:39:18 <hagarth> ok. moving on
12:39:24 <hagarth> #topic Other Agenda Items
12:39:47 <hagarth> Ubuntu - we certainly need some help & love to get a newer version of GlusterFS in Ubuntu
12:40:11 <hagarth> #action davemc to discuss with semiosis on inclusion of a newer GlusterFS version in Ubuntu
12:40:14 <ndevos> I think the cppcheck patch(es) have been merged now?
12:40:16 <hagarth> (reminder to davemc)
12:40:18 <hagarth> ndevos: yes
12:40:48 <ndevos> good, sounds like a major issue has been cleared
12:40:54 <hagarth> yeah
12:41:11 <hagarth> Gerrit upgrade is pending inputs from humble, JustinClift and misc
12:41:26 <hagarth> most of them are on PTO - so we will probably discuss about it next week
12:41:42 <hagarth> Application list that supports Gluster
12:41:57 <hagarth> #link - http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Native_Gluster_support_in_Applications
12:42:06 <hagarth> thanks to ndevos for creating that
12:42:17 <ndevos> yes, I just added that page to the wiki, please add your favorite applications too
12:42:22 <hagarth> we have quite a few that are to be added to that page
12:42:30 <ndevos> oh, definitely!
12:42:31 <hagarth> ndevos: did you forget cloudstack in there? :)
12:42:51 <ndevos> hagarth: no, just did not have the time for it - or for nfs-ganesha
12:43:09 <ndevos> purpleidea will want to add puppet-gluster too
12:43:26 <hagarth> ndevos: yeah
12:43:44 <ndevos> and scsi-target....something
12:43:47 <kkeithley> hagarth: just sent details about the longevity cluster
12:43:53 <hagarth> kkeithley: cool, thanks!
12:44:12 <hagarth> anything else for today?
12:44:46 <hagarth> figure not
12:44:56 * ndevos cant think of anything
12:45:10 <hagarth> next week might be a tad difficult for me to attend community meetings
12:45:22 <hagarth> will check with davemc if we should skip the meetings next week
12:45:54 <ndevos> I plan to do the bug triage one again
12:46:08 <hagarth> or if I am the only regular missing, we need not skip the meeting
12:46:46 <hagarth> alright then, that's all for today. Thanks for being here today!
12:46:58 <hagarth> #endmeeting