12:01:22 <JustinClift> #startmeeting Weekly Gluster Community Meeting
12:01:22 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Apr 29 12:01:22 2015 UTC.  The chair is JustinClift. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:01:22 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
12:01:24 <kkeithley> namakara
12:01:29 <kkeithley> namaskara
12:01:35 * spot is here
12:01:40 <JustinClift> No mascara?
12:01:41 * jimjag is here
12:01:47 * overclk is here
12:02:02 <kkeithley> jay sri krishna
12:02:08 * jdarcy is here
12:02:10 * ndevos is there
12:02:17 * raghu is here
12:02:17 <JustinClift> Etherpad: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-community-meetings
12:02:27 <jdarcy> hagarth is also here, but people are distracting him IRL
12:03:07 <JustinClift> Throw things at them
12:03:11 <JustinClift> So....
12:03:20 <JustinClift> #topic Action items from Last Meeting
12:03:29 * hagarth partially here
12:03:31 <JustinClift> "overclk will review the Overlay feature page by next meeting"
12:03:39 <jdarcy> One of them's my boss.  I think I'll keep the stuff-throwing to a minimum.
12:03:44 <JustinClift> How's that go?
12:03:44 <overclk> so, I haven't gotten far on this..
12:03:50 <JustinClift> "In progress" ?
12:04:09 <overclk> probably next week and/or during gluster summit..
12:04:10 * tigert is here
12:04:16 <overclk> yep, "in progress" please.
12:04:30 <JustinClift> #action overclk will review the Overlay feature page by next meeting or Gluster Summit
12:04:36 <JustinClift> "jdarcy to backport http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10322/ to release-3.7 branch"
12:05:02 <JustinClift> nudge
12:05:24 <jdarcy> Yes, it's even merged.
12:05:40 <jdarcy> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10351/
12:05:44 <JustinClift> Cool. :)
12:06:03 <JustinClift> "jdarcy will nag people for reviews on his backports"
12:06:20 <jdarcy> In progress.  But no throwing stuff.  ;)
12:06:24 <JustinClift> ;)
12:06:43 <JustinClift> "atinmu to raise the 2nd failures on NetBSD not helping much, on gluster-devel mailing list"
12:06:50 <JustinClift> Hmm, I kinda remember something like that
12:07:12 <jdarcy> I think I even replied, but it didn't go much further than that IIRC.
12:07:29 * JustinClift is looking for the URL
12:08:06 * msvbhat arrives late
12:08:28 <hagarth> was that mgmt-v3-locks.t ?
12:08:45 <JustinClift> Might have been
12:09:05 <hagarth> i think we have fixed that.
12:09:32 <JustinClift> hagarth: 12:10:16 here: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2015-04-22/gluster-meeting.2015-04-22-12.01.log.html
12:09:45 <jdarcy> http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2015-April/044633.html
12:09:47 <JustinClift> Is that the one
12:09:58 <hagarth> JustinClift: that's completely different
12:09:59 <JustinClift> Perfect
12:10:09 <atinmu> hagarth, no, this was related to auto trigger on failed test
12:10:27 <hagarth> atinmu: right
12:10:27 <JustinClift> The action item itself is done though
12:10:36 <JustinClift> So, marking that off
12:10:47 <JustinClift> "JustinClift to get basic forge v2 operational by next meeting"
12:10:57 <JustinClift> Still working on it.  Other stuff got in the way.
12:11:06 <JustinClift> Aiming for having it working by Gluster Summit
12:11:29 <JustinClift> #action JustinClift to have basic forge v2 operational by Gluster Summit
12:11:40 <JustinClift> "hagarth to release 3.7.0beta1 this week"
12:11:42 <JustinClift> Done
12:11:50 <JustinClift> "raghu to create new 3.6.4 tracker bug today"
12:12:06 <JustinClift> raghu: ?
12:12:12 <atinmu> its done
12:12:19 <atinmu> I see a BZ 1216965
12:12:25 <raghu> yeah. Its 1219166
12:12:35 <ndevos> oh, two of them?
12:12:35 <JustinClift> Cool. :)
12:12:53 <raghu> ndevos: Nope. Not 2. 1219166 is the one
12:13:00 <ndevos> :)
12:13:19 <ndevos> raghu: uh... Bug #1219166 does not exist
12:13:21 <atinmu> raghu, what is that other one then?
12:13:28 <JustinClift> They both exist for me?
12:13:40 <raghu> atinmu: there were 2 bugs? let me check
12:13:57 <JustinClift> Yeah.  And both seem the same.
12:13:59 <atinmu> raghu, I could see two of them
12:14:12 <JustinClift> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216965 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216966
12:14:34 <JustinClift> Sounds like the BZ system may have double submitted or something
12:14:37 <ndevos> JustinClift: thats not 1219166...
12:14:38 <raghu> atinmu: oops. Yeah. I saw it too. I dont remember creating 2 bugs and still have no idea how 2 bugs were created
12:15:00 <ndevos> raghu: please pick one, and set Alias=glusterfs-3.6.4 in it :)
12:15:14 <raghu> ndevos: yeah. sure.
12:15:21 <JustinClift> ndevos: You're confusing me?
12:15:48 <JustinClift> Oh yeah, it's not
12:16:00 <ndevos> JustinClift: no, I hope not - there are 3 bzs posted, and one of them does not exist
12:16:20 <JustinClift> They two I posted do exist.  I cut in posted them from the loaded urls. ;)
12:16:26 <ndevos> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.6.4 should be the one :)
12:16:31 <JustinClift> Good point
12:16:45 <JustinClift> .. and that errors out ;)
12:16:54 <JustinClift> raghu: I'm marking this "in progress" for now.
12:17:08 <ndevos> and that link will work once raghu has set the alias in the right bug
12:17:13 <JustinClift> #action raghu to create new 3.6.4 tracker bug today
12:17:19 <raghu> JustinClift: sure.
12:17:27 <JustinClift> "raghu to release 3.6.4beta1 by the end of next week"
12:18:04 <JustinClift> *cough*
12:18:45 <raghu> JustinClift: I have not done beta1 yet. Will do it next week
12:18:49 <JustinClift> k
12:18:54 <atinmu> raghu, I want one of my patch to go in for 3.6.4, I will let you know the details
12:19:07 <ndevos> atinmu: add it to the tracker :D
12:19:08 <raghu> atinmu: sure.
12:19:16 <JustinClift> #action raghu to release 3.6.4beta1 next week
12:19:30 <atinmu> ndevos, sure
12:19:32 <JustinClift> "ndevos to do release announcement for 3.5.4beta1 when the packages are ready"
12:19:57 <ndevos> still pending on the readiness of the packages
12:20:06 <JustinClift> Cool
12:20:12 <JustinClift> #action ndevos to do release announcement for 3.5.4beta1 when the packages are ready
12:20:19 <ndevos> there is some testing to do, I did not find the time for that yet
12:20:28 <JustinClift> "JustinClift to email gluster-users/devel/board with proposal for alternating meeting times"
12:20:42 <JustinClift> Done: https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2015-April/044635.html
12:20:52 <ndevos> results?
12:21:38 <JustinClift> We need to finish that discussion up though, as we only seemed to get one person interested (Joe Julian), and he didn't respond to whether he'd be the first chair or not
12:22:04 <JustinClift> #action JustinClif to prod the alternate weekly meeting times discussion back to life
12:22:13 <JustinClift> gah.  Name typo
12:22:23 <JustinClift> #action JustinClift to prod the alternate weekly meeting times discussion back to life
12:22:34 <JustinClift> #topic GlusterFS 3.7
12:22:56 <JustinClift> Status?
12:23:06 <JustinClift> We have the first beta tarball done...
12:23:21 <JustinClift> Guessing we're waiting for packages so we can announce it wider?
12:24:03 * ndevos guesses the same
12:24:44 <kkeithley> indeed
12:24:56 <JustinClift> Anyone know when RPM's are likely to be available?
12:25:17 <ndevos> maybe hchiramm is looking into that?
12:25:28 <JustinClift> #action JustinClift to reach out to likely testers when 3.7.0beta1 RPMs are available
12:26:10 <kkeithley> Lala is usually the one who builds, hchirram then puts them on d.g.o.
12:26:36 <JustinClift> k, well I'm reasonably sure it won't be far off
12:26:37 <JustinClift> Moving on
12:26:56 <JustinClift> #topic GlusterFS 3.6
12:27:03 <kkeithley> But lala doesn't work for gluster any more. We need to line up a replacement.  He and hchirram have someone in mind. They just need to bring him up to speed
12:27:11 <raghu> I have made 3.6.3 and have announced it as well. Planning to make a beta1 of 3.6.4 next week.
12:27:19 <JustinClift> Awesome. :)
12:27:54 <JustinClift> #topic GlusterFS 3.5
12:28:16 <ndevos> 3.5.4beta1 is almost available :)
12:28:42 <ndevos> packages need some testing, other than that, it should be ready
12:29:03 <JustinClift> Cool.
12:29:10 <ndevos> 3.5.4 will be included in Fedora 20+21
12:29:20 <ndevos> once it is out of beta, of course
12:29:21 <JustinClift> ndevos: So, release eta for the packages?
12:29:46 <ndevos> for non-beta? not before the end of next week
12:30:07 <JustinClift> Ahhh, I man for the beta
12:30:29 <JustinClift> The 3.5.4beta1 you mention is almost available ;)
12:30:38 <ndevos> maybe this week, or during the weekend or so
12:30:46 <JustinClift> Cool
12:30:55 <ndevos> lets say "the beginning of next week" ?
12:31:16 <JustinClift> Cool.
12:31:39 <JustinClift> #topic GlusterFS 4.0
12:31:58 <JustinClift> Hmmm, jdarcy seems to have dropped off IRC
12:32:12 <JustinClift> Anyone else know?
12:32:32 <hagarth> JustinClift: jdarcy will post an update to the list
12:32:47 <hagarth> (have the benefit of sitting next to jdarcy IRL atm) :)
12:32:59 <JustinClift> :)
12:33:15 <JustinClift> #action jdarcy will post a GlusterFS 4.0 update to the list(s)
12:33:36 <JustinClift> #topic Open Floor
12:33:37 <JustinClift> "vdsm-3.6 and glusterfs-3.7"
12:33:43 <kkeithley> yup
12:34:08 <JustinClift> "vdsm team needs (wants) 3.7 sooner rather than later; should we put 3.7.0beta1 in rawhide now?"
12:34:14 <JustinClift> That sounds like "yes"
12:34:26 <kkeithley> historically I've been pretty agressive about pushing new versions into Fedora
12:34:35 <JustinClift> Unless the work involved doing it now would distract us or hurt us in some way?
12:34:51 <kkeithley> But Niels and I have been leaning towards a more conservative posture lately
12:35:12 <ndevos> there is still quite some time for Fedora 23 to get ready, I assume we have 3.7.0 GA by then
12:35:19 <hagarth> JustinClift: +1 to rawhide
12:35:42 <kkeithley> is that +1 to the beta in rawhide?
12:35:49 <JustinClift> You guys sounds like you know the tradeoffs better than anyone else.  What do you reckon?
12:35:58 <hagarth> kkeithley: yes
12:35:58 <ndevos> yes, a +1 from me, it's beta, not alpha
12:36:23 <kkeithley> okay, nobody seems to be opposed
12:36:35 <JustinClift> "Make it so Scotty" :)
12:36:58 <JustinClift> k, anyone else have stuff for the open floor?
12:37:00 <kkeithley> and F22?
12:37:08 <ndevos> no, not F22, that is too late
12:37:18 <JustinClift> I canna do that Captain!
12:37:47 <JustinClift> Sounds like no to F22 and yeah to rawhide
12:37:50 <kkeithley> well, it can be done...  but
12:37:50 <JustinClift> Workable?
12:38:24 <kkeithley> You'll be breaking the hearts and souls of the vdsm folks.  But I'm sure they'll live. ;-)
12:38:47 <ndevos> the vdsm people can use the community packages for older releases if they really want to :)
12:38:51 <kkeithley> just because you can do a thing, doesn't mean you should. ;-)
12:39:06 <JustinClift> :)
12:39:12 <JustinClift> k, that sounds decided then
12:39:14 <ndevos> oh, and there are still some packaging changes that need to get done in 3.7, maybe wait for those?
12:39:38 <kkeithley> such as?
12:39:59 <kkeithley> I have all the upstream changes to date in the dist-git spec
12:40:00 <ndevos> the almost empty python-gluster package, and some splitting of glusterfs-api dependencies
12:40:15 <kkeithley> any more changes will get merged in
12:40:30 <ndevos> well, and the correct placement of new xlators, some of them are -server only, others should be client-side
12:40:49 <kkeithley> yeah, when they happen, and there's a beta2 or GA release those changes will be added to the dist-git spec
12:41:00 <kkeithley> s/yeah/agreed/
12:41:01 * ndevos shrugs
12:41:38 <ndevos> +1 to happy vdsm folks, and we push other changes later :)
12:41:47 <kkeithley> unless we want to add patches just for the beta, which I'm kinda not inclined to do. It's a lot of work that'll just be thrown away in a week
12:42:03 <ndevos> no, we dont want to do that
12:42:10 <JustinClift> k, anyone else have other stuff for the open floor?
12:42:22 <tigert> http://glusternew-tigert.rhcloud.com/
12:42:29 <tigert> some content would be appreciated :)
12:42:45 <tigert> but theres a start for a simplified content reboot
12:43:05 <JustinClift> Interesting.  The top menu bar is nifty
12:43:26 <JustinClift> tigert: Want to announce it to the mailing lists so people can take a look?
12:43:33 <tigert> yeah I can
12:43:41 <spot> tigert: the logo will be in that design somewhere, right? :)
12:43:51 <tigert> I would really want some input on the "what is gluster and what do we want to say to the world" part :)
12:44:04 * spot is all for minimal, but we need branding
12:44:04 <tigert> spot: yes
12:44:31 <ndevos> hey, we have a http://planet.gluster.org/ ?
12:44:34 <kkeithley> oh, so actually, the vdsm folks can't use older releases.  They want Fedora secondary arches like ppc64, which we don't build for d.g.o
12:44:36 <tigert> we do
12:44:37 <spot> tigert: possibly put some lorem ipsum in there before emailing it out
12:44:53 <tigert> planet.gluster.org has some issues keeping up to date but I am working with misc to get that fixed
12:45:18 <JustinClift> Guys, discuss this on list
12:45:53 <JustinClift> #action tigert to announce new Gluster website layout demo to the mailing lists
12:46:08 <ndevos> oh, professional support does not list Red Hat Gluster Storage?
12:46:11 <JustinClift> #action spot to bring up the Branding? question for it in response
12:46:19 <tigert> spot: I rather try to copywrite something real, easier to say "NOO THAT IS WRONG, IT SHOULD BE [ correct content ]" <- handy cut and paste snippet
12:46:19 <JustinClift> ndevos: I've pointed that out before too
12:46:31 <tigert> so I can get the correct content
12:46:46 <spot> tigert: sure, but in this case, where there is nothing, I'd rather see how it would flow
12:46:59 <tigert> ndevos: yeah RH needs to be added there
12:47:12 <JustinClift> kkeithley: bring up the secondary arches on list maybe?  See if we can figure out a solution...
12:47:16 <tigert> spot: the design will be awesome anyway, its just layout
12:47:19 * spot will stop talking here and discuss on list as requested. :)
12:47:21 <tigert> writing the content is the harder part for me
12:47:24 <JustinClift> #endmeeting