11:59:58 #startmeeting 11:59:59 Meeting started Wed Aug 12 11:59:58 2015 UTC. The chair is atinm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 11:59:59 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 12:00:38 #info agenda is available @ https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-community-meetings 12:01:11 Roll Call 12:01:23 who all do we have here today? 12:01:26 #topic roll call 12:01:29 * hchiramm is in 12:01:36 * kkeithley is here 12:01:37 * poornimag is here 12:01:41 * msvbhat is here 12:02:04 * tigert is here 12:02:05 few more names? 12:02:17 ........ 12:02:46 We will wait for couple of minutes and then move on 12:02:50 * raghu is here 12:04:09 atinm, please proceed :) 12:04:39 hchiramm, yes 12:04:47 #topic action items from last week 12:05:16 tigert to summarize options for integrating a calendar on the website, call for feedback 12:05:21 So I looked into the calendar stuff, and mailed gluster-infra asking for feedback on what functionality is needed, I also posted a few possible ideas. 12:05:22 tigert, any updates on this? 12:05:27 http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-infra/2015-August/001338.html 12:05:36 tigert++ 12:05:44 not much replies yet (since it was pretty last minute to this meeting, sorry about that) 12:05:56 #info tigert has asked for feedback about integrating gluster calendar @ http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-infra/2015-August/001338.html 12:06:08 but lets wait a bit for more feedback 12:06:29 Yeah, probably send a gentle reminder to that thread after few days? 12:07:04 * kkeithley thought it looked fine. I had one suggestion, which I sent in a reply 12:07:34 yeah 12:07:45 kkeithley: yeah thanks for that one 12:07:50 it was a good one too 12:08:06 #action tigert to send a reminder mail to ask for feedback for gluster calendar integration 12:08:12 Moving on 12:08:12 we are also pondering within our osas team about this since a community events calendar is something many projects need 12:08:15 but lets see 12:08:24 based on the feed back from the mail sent by raghu , gluster.org need to be updated 12:08:54 raghu, I believe most of the members are ok with it, so do you plan to update the site with the release date guidelines? 12:09:01 https://github.com/gluster/glusterweb/blob/master/source/community/release-schedule.md 12:09:03 * overclk is late to the meeting 12:09:11 tigert++ has created a sample page in github 12:09:31 raghu, if u can fill the content in it , tigert can help us to push that page in gluster.org 12:09:51 #info release schedule details @ https://github.com/gluster/glusterweb/blob/master/source/community/release-schedule.md 12:10:19 raghu, are you there? 12:10:45 atinm: sure. I will do fill the contents 12:10:51 raghu, ok 12:11:05 raghu++ thanks ! 12:11:24 #action raghu to fill in the contents for release schedule and ask tigert to push the page in gluster.org 12:11:40 Next action was on rtalur to setup a new project gerrit specs in review.gluster.org 12:11:48 seems like rtalur is not here 12:11:54 anyone has any update on this? 12:12:19 * anoopcs is here 12:12:33 moving this item for next week 12:12:40 #action rtalur to setup a new project gerrit specs in review.gluster.org 12:13:09 next item is on hagarth and kshlmto do 3.7.3 announcement on the gluster blog and social media 12:13:12 atinm, 12:13:18 http://review.gluster.org/#/admin/projects/glusterfs-specs I have setup the project 12:13:42 have given acls to glusterfs maintainers. 12:13:57 hchiramm, ok 12:14:03 atinm: I have added 3.7.3 in gluster news from the week 12:14:05 however we will cross check and announce to the gluster infra with the details 12:14:40 hchiramm, ok, lets continue with this item for next week 12:14:44 sure.. 12:14:53 msvbhat, is it been integrated with planet gluster? 12:15:22 atinm: Not yet, 12:15:33 msvbhat, we would need to do that 12:15:41 atinm: Someone can help with syndicating? I haven't published it yet 12:15:59 atinm: Yes, I will ask someone for help. 12:15:59 msvbhat, ndevos, tigert can help you on this 12:16:22 tigert: I will ping you after the meeting for some help 12:16:29 #action msvbhat to do 3.7.3 announcement on the gluster blog and social media 12:16:39 Moving on 12:16:46 pranithk to write up a post announcing EC's production readiness. 12:17:15 Any updates from others since Pranith is not around? 12:17:21 atinm, I havent noticed 12:17:28 * atinm echoes the same 12:17:49 #action pranithk to write up a post announcing EC's production readiness 12:18:04 Next on the plate is rtalur to send update mailing list with a DiSTAF how-to and start discussion on enhancements to DiSTAF 12:18:17 msvbhat, do you have any update on this on rtalur's absence? 12:18:36 atinm: I will send a mail 12:19:13 #action msvbhat/rtalur to send update mailing list with a DiSTAF how-to and start discussion on enhancements to DiSTAF. 12:19:17 There are some update about it and some feedback 12:19:44 msvbhat, ok, you can capture all those details in your mail 12:19:48 Moving on 12:19:51 kshlm to test the new jenkins slave in ci.gluster.org - did some tests, but misc did most of the testing 12:20:02 kshlm is not around though 12:20:14 Not sure whether its been done 12:20:21 anyone on this? 12:20:44 no idea. 12:21:01 #action kshlm to test the new jenkins slave in ci.gluster.org 12:21:14 Next items is shyam will announce DHT2 related work efforts and repository for Gl4.0 this week 12:21:19 this is done 12:22:00 #info Shyam has announced about DHT2 @ http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2015-August/046369.html 12:22:32 Last one is on rafi about adding a new topic for GlusterFS 3.8 12:22:42 and its done 12:22:45 atinm: done 12:22:54 So we are done with the action items 12:23:05 #topic GlusterFS 3.7 12:23:48 anything needs to be discussed? 12:24:05 since kshlm is not around I feel free to skip it 12:24:36 anyone? 12:25:06 I take it as "No" 12:25:20 #topic GlusterFS 3.6 12:25:56 raghu, do you have anything to update here? 12:26:24 Not much 12:26:31 I will be making the release next week 12:26:39 as per the schedule that we decided. 12:26:51 #info Gluster 3.6 is getting released in next week 12:26:58 more backports are welcome 12:27:04 raghu, :) 12:27:17 I have some patches in the pipeline to be merged. 12:27:26 I am going to do them by couple of days. 12:27:45 but I would prefer if there are few more backports 12:28:02 #info raghu seeks for more backports for next 3.6 release 12:28:07 allright 12:28:12 anything else on this front? 12:28:20 atinm: nope 12:28:22 or else I will move to next topic 12:28:32 #topic GlusterFS 3.5 12:28:37 ndevos, are you around? 12:28:49 ayone has to say about 3.5? 12:29:05 probably not around 12:29:16 Lost in Pune 12:29:23 kkeithley, :) 12:29:30 Ok, moving on 12:29:38 #topic Glusterfs 3.8 12:29:50 For 3.5, i think is mainly blocked on one of libgfapi backport, i will backport it next week 12:30:27 #action poornimag to backport one of the libgfapi related changes into 3.5 12:30:41 Who wants to talk about 3.8 12:31:23 #info More information about what we target in for 3.8 can be found @ http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2015-July/022722.html 12:31:38 5 12:31:39 4 12:31:40 3 12:31:41 2 12:31:42 1 12:31:45 0 12:31:54 kkeithley, just using your trick ;) 12:32:07 #topic GlusterFS 4.0 12:32:08 it's a good trick, eh? ;-) 12:32:18 kkeithley, yes :) 12:32:49 #info Gluster 4.0 Tracker : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=glusterfs-4.0 12:33:50 #info GlusterD 2.0 high level plan for next 2-3 months is out now @ http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2015-August/046310.html 12:34:48 This talks about what we are exploring now, folks are evaluating different RPC techniques, stabilizing the skeleton and rewritting the volfile generation part 12:35:10 We will be sharing the code repo once the skeleton is stable and ready to use 12:35:50 As discussed as part of last week's action items, Shyam has also shared the details about DHT2 12:36:00 Anything else on 4.0? 12:36:25 * atinm feels its one way traffic now 12:36:56 Moving on 12:37:02 the last topic 12:37:10 #topic Open Floor 12:37:57 #info Weekly reminder to announce Gluster attendance of events: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-events 12:38:09 I don't think we are doing a good job with this :( 12:38:24 is this up to date? 12:38:49 atinm, the right place is website.. 12:39:06 may be we can have a sub page for community which list the events.. 12:39:12 tigert what do u think / 12:39:42 hchiramm, we can very well do that 12:39:45 hchiramm++ 12:40:37 #action Instead of maintaining a public pad, integrate the gluster event details in gluster.org, tigert / hchiramm to work on it 12:40:52 #info REMINDER to put (even minor) interesting topics on https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-weekly-news 12:41:13 Thanks msvbhat to taking it up for publishing for Week 30 12:41:56 I would urge everyone to add important achievements in this pad 12:42:21 #info Per release documentation. Users are landing on 3.2 documentation from google itseems. How can we make this better 12:42:30 I've no idea on this, anyone? 12:43:59 The last but not the least 12:44:01 #info Spurious failures - status 12:44:50 IMHO, I've seen a single patch in this week which tries to fix one of them and that bothers me a bit 12:45:00 read it as I've not 12:45:30 Who wants to send a reminder mail to the thread which hagarth initiated 12:45:50 wrt landing on 3.2 doc... I believe Humble did some google magic to try to fix that. Is that right? 12:46:40 hchiramm: ^^^ 12:46:52 kkeithley, I tried 12:46:53 :) 12:47:07 we are almost in , however stuck with RTD design 12:47:13 so that takes a little while before it'll have an effect. 12:47:20 s/an/any/ 12:47:32 yes.. 12:47:58 however this task is on going , hopefully we will have a complete solution soon 12:49:01 hchiramm, cool 12:49:17 any takers on replying to the mail thread http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2015-July/046284.html 12:50:06 all right 12:50:15 any other topics to be discussed? 12:50:26 I will wait for a minute and then we can adjourn 12:50:35 what kind of reply? Are we not in agreement that that's a good way to proceed? 12:52:29 kkeithley, reminder to fix the spurious failures 12:52:55 kkeithley, or remove the test unit to a different folder 12:53:06 kkeithley, does that make sense? 12:53:11 sure 12:53:49 I'll reply ;-) 12:53:58 kkeithley, cool :) 12:54:10 unless someone else has a strong desire to. 12:54:39 #action kkeithley to drop a follow up mail about spurious failure fixes 12:54:55 Allright, that brings us to the end of this meeting 12:55:02 thanks everyone for participating 12:55:06 #endmeeting