12:00:43 #startmeeting Gluster community weekly meeting 12:00:43 Meeting started Wed Jan 27 12:00:43 2016 UTC. The chair is atinm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 12:00:43 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 12:00:43 The meeting name has been set to 'gluster_community_weekly_meeting' 12:01:30 We didn't have a meeting last time due to less participation and hence I expect some attendance this time :) 12:01:53 #info The agenda is right here : https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-community-meetings 12:01:58 #topic Roll call 12:02:05 Who all do we have here today? 12:02:12 * Manikandan_ is here 12:02:19 * msvbhat is present 12:02:22 * overclk is around 12:02:24 * hgowtham here 12:03:02 I am glad that Manikandan has volunteered to learn the process of hosting and next time onwards he is going to help us in hosting 12:03:17 We'll wait for couple of minutes to get settled and then move on 12:03:22 atinm, thanks ;-) 12:04:31 * ndevos _o/ 12:04:53 only 6 people ? 12:05:06 atinm: :-/ 12:05:40 kkeithley is travelling, I dont expect him to join 12:05:54 not sure if hagarth is awake yet... 12:06:06 last time we canceled it due to less participation 12:06:24 hagarth informed me that he has to run through some other meetings 12:06:27 * rastar is here 12:06:39 Anyways lets get started 12:06:40 rafi: ? 12:06:52 #topic AI from last week 12:07:01 ndevos to send out a reminder to the maintainers about more actively 12:07:01 enforcing backports of bugfixes (this year) 12:07:23 oh, someone added "this year", that should be doable 12:07:24 ndevos, any updates on this? 12:07:36 no update, still need to do it 12:07:38 ndevos, I just carried it forward, so not sure who added ;) 12:07:57 #action ndevos to send out a reminder to the maintainers about more actively enforcing backports of bugfixes 12:08:02 Moving on 12:08:09 kshlm & csim to set up faux/pseudo user email for gerrit, bugzilla, github 12:08:15 csim, kshlm : any updates on this? 12:08:47 csim, kshlm : Are you guys around? 12:09:30 seems like no, so moving on 12:09:46 #action kshlm & csim to set up faux/pseudo user email for gerrit, bugzilla, github 12:10:00 Next one is rastar and msvbhat to consolidate and publish testing matrix on gluster.org. amye can help post Jan 1 12:10:08 Any updates on it msvbhat & rastar ? 12:10:10 atinm: Not done yet 12:10:24 msvbhat, so move to next week? 12:10:26 atinm: In fact I had conventiently forgotton it 12:10:32 atinm: Please 12:10:40 atinm: I try to finish by next weel 12:10:42 *week 12:10:48 it might take more than a week 12:11:03 so two weeks is a realistic time? 12:11:06 yes 12:11:22 #action rastar and msvbhat to consolidate and publish testing matrix on gluster.org in two weeks time, amye can help 12:11:45 Since kkeithley is not around I am skipping his AI 12:11:49 #action kkeithley to send a mail about using sanity checker tools in the codebase 12:11:58 Next AI was kshlm to write up a README for glusterfs-specs 12:12:02 I think this was done 12:12:15 yes, I think the new README is much clearer 12:12:35 #info new README is at http://review.gluster.org/13187 which is merged in glusterfs-specs now 12:12:36 #link https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-specs/blob/master/README.md 12:12:50 Moving on 12:12:52 kshlm to announce the availability of 3.6.8 12:13:06 I've not seen any mail on this yet 12:13:39 me neither... 12:13:46 Its just the announcement which is pending 12:13:57 I'll try to poke him and remind him about it :) 12:14:18 #action atinm to talk to kshlm on announcing 3.6.8 12:14:34 The last AI for today is atinm to move all the design docs of GD2 to glusterfs-specs 12:15:13 This is WIP, patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13237/ is under review, got a +1 from one of the reviewer, should be able to get it done in a day's time 12:15:26 That concludes the AI list 12:15:47 Moving on 12:15:56 #topic GlusterFS 3.7 12:16:05 pranithk seems to be not around 12:16:17 anyone knows about the current status of the next release 12:16:18 ? 12:16:20 I think he is waiting for regression to pass for some of the patches. 12:16:35 hmm 12:17:07 I don't think we should wait too long for a release 12:18:00 I can understand that few critical fixes are on that pending list, but not releasing for almost two months also doesn't make a good impression IMO 12:18:11 I think we need to be strategic here 12:18:24 pending patches: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/glusterfs-3.7.7 12:18:24 what you guys think? 12:18:57 I think there was a severe issue that needs to be fixed, and we definitely want to have that included 12:19:42 I agree. If there are bugs which are critical and already identified then we should make a release only with those bugs fixed. 12:19:43 not sure if we need all of them, minor bugs can be acceptible and fixed in the release for next month - assuming those are not regressions 12:20:01 #info 3.7.7 is delayed as some critical patches are still not in due to regression failures 12:20:17 ndevos, yes we need to filter them 12:20:19 atinm: if there's a critical bug/issue, it's good to wait and have that in the next release.. 12:20:45 atinm: I see a data loss bug in the list.. 12:21:23 overclk, I am not against it, my point is have we done that exercise that all of them are severe? 12:22:12 My point is we shouldn't be waiting for patches which are not absolutely critical :) 12:22:14 atinm: data loss == sever (at least 99.99% of the time) 12:22:25 s/sever/severe/ 12:22:49 anyways I'd leave it upto pranithk to take that call 12:22:52 Moving on 12:22:59 #topic GlusterFS 3.6 12:23:17 I don't think kshlm is around 12:23:30 raghu, are you? Any plan for 3.6.9? 12:24:11 he was merging patches earlier today 12:24:32 ndevos, ok 12:24:40 So lets sync up on this next week 12:24:58 #topic GlusterFS 3.5 12:25:12 ndevos, 3.5.8 is not out yet right? 12:25:19 waiting for some quota changes/feedback from Manikandan_ 12:25:38 ndevos, ahh I forgot, I will get it done today 12:25:38 no, there were no patches merged, so no need to release anything 12:26:05 ndevos, sorry for the delay 12:26:24 if Manikandan_ checks and comfirms the upstream status of the reported issues/fixes, the next 3.5 release will get those improvements 12:27:05 the release is planned for around the 10th of Feb. 12:27:40 ndevos, so is it the only patch which you are waiting for? 12:27:48 ndevos, sure, will update you soon 12:28:10 atinm: yes, 3.5 is pretty stable, and does not receive a lot of backports 12:28:30 ndevos, I have sent two patches for 3.5 12:28:37 ndevos, ok 12:28:51 Manikandan_: yes, both for quota, right? 12:28:51 http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12990/ and http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13215/ 12:28:55 ndevos, yup 12:29:19 Manikandan_: thanks, just confirm that they are backports, or why the problem is not in other releases 12:29:28 ndevos, so do you plan to take them in and release 3.5.8? 12:29:57 atinm: sure, anything that fixes a bug in 3.5 stands a chance of getting merged :) 12:31:09 ndevos, I will update that 12:31:28 ndevos, anything else on 3.5? 12:31:41 Manikandan_: thanks, you still have some time before I do a release :) 12:31:46 atinm: nope, that's all 12:31:51 ndevos, thanks 12:31:53 Moving on 12:31:55 Manikandan_, thanks too ;-) 12:32:00 #topic GlusterFS 3.8 12:32:17 hagarth, are you around? DO you want to update anything here? 12:33:09 One important announcement about 3.8 was http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2016-January/047729.html 12:33:35 #info 3.8 will be out by end of May or early June 2016 12:34:00 We haven't heard any objections on this proposal so I think the plan is on 12:34:19 Any other things on 3.8 which needs a discussion? 12:35:04 get those feature pages and designs posted? 12:35:05 I take it no and hence moving to the next topic 12:35:39 that's a request to all 3.8 feature owners 12:35:51 #topic GlusterFS 4.0 12:36:04 overclk, want to update about DHTv2? 12:36:12 atinm, sure. 12:36:34 So, we had planned to complete POC last week, but that didn't happen due to various reasons.. 12:36:55 reasons == Shyam got busy elsewhere, I got tied up with things 12:37:16 So, POC was planned for this week, but I don't think we'll make it. 12:37:45 Mostly next week I think should be our target (also Shyam will be in BLR office on 1st Feb) 12:37:57 That's about it 12:38:01 overclk, thanks for the updates 12:38:07 I will go with GlusterD2.0 12:38:08 small note 12:38:20 overclk, sure, go ahead 12:38:28 next plan would be to get dhtv2 code into xlators/experimental 12:38:41 #info DHTv2 PoC might take another week to get over 12:38:43 -- done -- 12:39:11 In GlusterD 2.0 we are working on etcd bootstrapping part 12:39:44 along with that work on txn framework is in progress 12:39:51 that's about GD2 12:40:01 DO we have any representatives from NSR? 12:40:08 asengupt, ?? 12:40:43 I guess he is not around 12:41:06 The updates what I have from NSR is they are working on reconciliation and client/server translators 12:41:20 aravindavk, Do you want to update about Eventing? 12:41:48 asengupt still busy with finding a name for NSR ? ;) 12:41:55 overclk, :) 12:42:15 overclk, and he has started a poll and promised to come up with goodies ;) 12:42:31 atinm, then he's busy shopping :) 12:42:51 seems like aravindavk is also not around 12:42:54 i would propose ORR 12:43:10 One Replication to Rule (them all) ;) 12:43:19 hagarth, :) 12:43:22 hagarth: Outer Ring Road :P 12:43:31 lol 12:43:39 hagarth, atinm: I proposed "Flexi Rep" 12:43:59 Add them in the etherpad which he shared :) 12:44:14 already done 12:44:23 anyways moving on 12:44:46 I think eventing team is going to call for a hangout to discuss about the design 12:44:55 I haven't heard from them after it 12:45:08 hagarth, do you have any information around it? 12:45:29 atinm: that is the latest I have too 12:45:39 hagarth, ok 12:45:41 That concludes 4.0 12:45:48 anything else ? 12:45:59 or I will move to the last topic 12:46:14 I take it as No 12:46:26 #topic Open Floor 12:49:09 There is a note about python3 in the open floor section however the same has been discussed over email and link for it is http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2016-January/047808.html 12:49:19 Apart from that I don't see anything else 12:49:49 Does anyone have any other thing to discuss or else we are done for today 12:50:41 I'd take it as No 12:50:48 Thanks everyone for attending 12:50:54 atinm: thank you, good luck for the week ahead! 12:50:54 Have a great time! 12:51:13 hagarth, I 'll be speaking at LCA2016, so won't be available next week 12:51:14 thanks atinm! 12:51:18 thanks atinm and all the best for LCA. 12:51:29 #endmeeting