05:03:20 #startmeeting i18n 05:03:20 Meeting started Thu Feb 23 05:03:20 2012 UTC. The chair is tagoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 05:03:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 05:03:25 #meetingname i18n 05:03:25 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:03:30 %topic agenda and roll call 05:03:39 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2012-02-23 05:03:46 hi. time for i18n meeting 05:06:17 hi 05:06:20 hi 05:06:22 hi 05:06:26 hi 05:07:16 hi 05:08:28 hi 05:08:46 okay, let's get started. 05:08:50 #topic F17 05:09:35 as you may know Alpha is ready to go and RC4 has been declared as GOLD 05:09:52 nice 05:10:29 would be nice to play with it and catch up any issues earlier if any. 05:10:37 yes 05:10:54 hi 05:11:18 how about our features going on? let's pick up one-by-one again.. 05:11:50 paragan, pravins: how about Additional Indic Langs? 05:14:18 jni: how about fonts-tweak-tool? 05:14:32 pravins is working on that feature 05:15:02 I guess he is going to release updated Lohit fonts today or tomorrow 05:15:11 aha. cool 05:15:19 jni is in a local teck talk, and he released 0.0.3 upstream. 05:15:36 epico_laptop: right. 05:15:55 I guess it could be marked as 100% complete now. 05:16:07 * epico_laptop think so. 05:16:59 paragan: is there any remaining tasks except fontconfig? 05:17:06 and fonts 05:17:55 no i guess 05:18:07 I will update ortho files today 05:18:21 cool 05:18:30 tagoh, if Dogri and Bodo languages are using same hi.orth 05:18:47 should we just include it or write complete coverage? 05:19:04 better include it I guess. 05:19:22 ok 05:19:38 anish_: how about english-typing-booster? 05:19:59 it is going very well till now 05:20:15 just only one minor bug reported so far 05:21:12 good. what's the tasks to fill in the remaining 10%? 05:21:32 fix minor bug 05:21:34 :) 05:22:05 is it needed to implement features? or just a bug? 05:22:13 just a bug 05:22:49 as we talked about it in the last meeting, you better thinking of bug fixes separately. 05:23:16 then we can bump it to 100% then. 05:23:34 sure i marked as 100% completion then 05:23:39 thanks 05:23:44 thanks 05:25:10 for IndicUnicode6, does next release of lohit implement the necessary features? 05:26:20 okay, anything else for f17? 05:27:22 docbeats are open. that would be nice to see the updates earlier. 05:28:08 what are the main topics to cover there this time? 05:28:42 even some initial placeholder text might be a good start to expand on 05:28:50 non-features topic I suppose. 05:29:08 yeah, specifically I mean? 05:29:46 for example, that would be good idea to explain the default font changes for Korean? 05:30:25 yes 05:30:40 maybe some update on ibus too? 05:30:48 yeah, sounds good. 05:32:22 epico_laptop, also Zenhei default changed? 05:32:30 good to think about what you've done this time and add it there if it's worth mentioning. 05:32:40 juhp: okay, I see. 05:33:44 yes! 05:34:14 I added 3 bullet points so far as placeholders 05:34:24 thanks! 05:34:31 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_I18n_Beat 05:34:43 feel free to add more and edit if you like 05:35:51 okay, anything else? 05:35:51 fujiwarat, if you could add sub-bullets for the main new ibus features/changes that would be helpful :) 05:36:23 juhp: ok, i see. 05:36:41 hi 05:37:20 pravins: any updates for indic features? :) 05:37:36 tagoh: yes, all locales are in FEdora 17 now :) 05:37:52 nice 05:38:08 and thanks to for committing ortho patches in fontoconfig upstream, so will not face any problem in that direction as well 05:38:31 only releasing lohit with Unicode 6.0 support is remaining, i am going to do it tomorrow 05:38:40 so hoping i can change feature to 100% by tomorrow 05:38:46 I see 05:39:14 let's move on then. 05:39:18 #topic Input Methods 05:39:30 any updates and concerns to share? 05:40:00 released ibus-hunspell-table for f15,16 and 17 05:40:45 right now ,it supports only en-us dictionary 05:41:01 aha 05:42:57 anish_, is it going to support more languages later? 05:43:58 yes ,i am planning to support all European languages 05:44:04 :) 05:44:42 fujiwarat: anything for ibus? 05:45:08 :) 05:45:17 btw I think i noticed that ibus doesn't enable anthy by default for ja users in F17? 05:45:20 Probably I'd like to integrate a new ibus-anthy based on gtk3 next week. 05:45:33 or am I wrong? 05:45:49 aha 05:45:53 guess I should file a bug 05:46:24 could it be so for all langs? 05:46:29 juhp: Maybe you're talking about preload-engine. 05:46:36 fujiwarat, yes 05:46:39 I think 05:47:01 seems I have to add anthy each time for a new user in ja 05:47:15 is that intentional? 05:47:15 yeah, it was removed in ibut 1.5 and I'd like to integrate that feature. 05:47:25 I see 05:47:50 so currently no defaults IMEs? 05:47:50 Probably I think one bug is good. 05:48:07 upstream change? 05:48:12 ok 05:48:29 no default input metods. Currently I added keyboard engines only by default. 05:48:36 it is a bit of a regression though but I suppose people can live with it for now 05:48:50 agreed 05:48:51 fujiwarat, would 1.5 be in f18? 05:49:07 would be nice if we can fix it until beta. 05:49:18 Ah, I meant 1.4.99 is nearly equal to 1.5. 05:49:22 mm yeah 05:49:31 ah right yes 05:49:55 misread 05:50:15 alright I'll file a bug 05:50:28 okay, anything else for IM? 05:50:30 do you plan to fix it for f17? 05:51:17 Yes, I'd like to update ibus for those regressions. 05:51:29 wonder if Fedora 17 in bugzilla yet? 05:51:33 okay nice 05:52:21 juhp: it is. 05:52:26 OK, March 20th is the dead line. 05:52:30 ah good 05:52:41 for Beta changes? 05:52:51 yes 05:54:49 okay, better move on. 05:55:02 #topic Fonts and Rendering 05:55:08 any updates and concerns to share? 05:56:03 tagoh: did you saw discussion regarding liberation fonts font mailing list 05:56:29 pravins: roughly yes. 05:56:33 basically request to add Web fonts format in liberation font release 05:56:40 yep 05:57:07 he is even requesting to add subpackage -woff or -eot in liberation package 05:57:21 tagoh: juhp do we have any of this kind in Fedora 05:58:33 guess it's new for the font packaging to have different format in the package. 05:58:52 are there no webfonts currently in fedora? 05:59:31 yeah, i think not, why to have webfonts in OS platform ;) 06:00:49 not that bad to ship the web fonts packages though, particularly for the server variants. 06:01:53 good to discuss for updating the packaging policy and naming guidelines if necessary. 06:02:29 tagoh: sure, will do work on it next month 06:02:36 okay 06:03:06 anything else? 06:03:31 for fonts and rendering, or any other topics if we are missing in the agenda. 06:03:50 fontconfig may be? 06:04:26 dunno if it could be a topic for our meeting ;) 06:05:13 he he, yes agree :) 06:05:29 it could be when new release is out though 06:05:42 anyway 06:06:17 okay, let's stop here then. thanks everyone for the meeting! 06:06:31 #endmeeting