05:06:41 #startmeeting i18n 05:06:41 Meeting started Thu May 31 05:06:41 2012 UTC. The chair is tagoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 05:06:41 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 05:06:44 #meetingname i18n 05:06:44 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:06:50 #topic agenda and roll call 05:07:01 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2012-05-31 05:07:10 hi 05:07:11 sorry for a bit late start. 05:07:25 anyway, shall we have i18n meeting now 05:07:50 hi 05:08:00 hi 05:09:04 hi 05:09:51 hi 05:10:02 hi 05:10:05 okay, time to go, let's get started then. 05:10:12 #topic F18 05:10:36 f17 has been released. thanks guys for your hard work on f17! 05:11:48 f18 planning and development has been began. current schedule on f18 is, the feature submission deadline coming July 24. 05:12:26 and feature freeze is August 7 05:13:14 does anyone have any feature proposal so far? I can add it to the agenda to keep it on track if any. 05:13:31 or any suggestions for i18n features in f18? 05:16:14 that would be nice to have one to make it clear what kind of tests we need to do and easier to get more volunteers as feature testers, in test days say. 05:16:19 anish_, you had a feature in mind? 05:16:36 maybe good to list it already even before feature page as a reminder? 05:16:49 juhp: yeah 05:16:57 juhp, yes i an going to file feature for ibus-hunspell 05:17:26 I can poke the owners to have one or ask the progress :) 05:17:47 I am removing indic typing booster packages 05:18:16 added 05:18:55 thought I said it in the previous meeting, good to add liberation as well? 05:20:37 added autohint stuff too 05:20:39 anything more? 05:20:58 aha 05:21:14 epico, do you want to do a feature for ibus-libpinyin? 05:21:25 ah, yeah, good idea 05:21:50 juhp: okay, will create one feature page. 05:22:26 maybe it is better to focus on gnome ibus integration upstream? 05:22:46 though we could track the gnome feature page perhaps? 05:22:52 yep, sounds good. will it happens in f18 btw? 05:23:01 * juhp hopes so 05:23:16 juhp: ah, yep, if it covers ibus integration as well. 05:23:34 guess better ask the desktop team about it? 05:24:11 I think we could help something for that 05:24:40 https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive/Features/IBus 05:24:49 yes 05:25:16 specially after all the discussion :) 05:25:19 ah, well, I meant our feature proposal for gnome in f18 :) I guess we may have one? 05:25:36 ah yeah dunno perhaps 05:25:38 fujiwarat, ? 05:25:56 but seems we need to land it upstream really not fedora 05:26:05 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome3.6 05:26:11 well both I suppose :) 05:26:15 hmm, I can't find any ibus related 05:26:23 guess we should have one separately perhaps? 05:26:23 hi 05:26:39 but also some ibus work needed I guess 05:27:00 tagoh, yeah it may be good - but I think main hurdle is upstream 05:27:07 right 05:27:14 I hope ibus in f18. 05:27:33 that's why it may be better to ask the desktop team, to update the feature page :) 05:27:38 so let's list it definitely - and yeah can't hurt to have a fedora feature page too 05:27:45 aha 05:27:49 okay 05:27:59 good idea 05:28:18 that would be better I guess 05:28:21 well, it may affects to QA. good to have one since this looks like major change in the desktop and IM. 05:29:53 juhp: can you ask mclasen to add ibus to the feature page? 05:30:14 if he thinks it would be good to have separate feature, that would be even good. then we can open new one for ibus 05:30:46 ok sure I will do that 05:31:02 thanks! 05:31:26 #action juhp to ask mclasen to add ibus to the GNOME 3.6 feature page 05:31:33 anything more on f18? 05:32:46 * pravins wrote blog on f17 yesterday http://pravin-s.blogspot.in/2012/05/indian-internationalization.html 05:33:30 pravins: cool 05:33:39 thanks tagoh 05:34:16 okay, if not, let's move on. 05:34:23 #topic Input Methods 05:34:37 any updates or conerns to share on IM? 05:35:30 I started package reviews of ibus-xkb and ibus-gjs. 05:35:48 fujiwarat: cool 05:37:52 fcitx package reviews are done and pending for submitter to import in Fedora 05:38:21 fujiwarat: btw do you have a bug# for ibus-gjs? 05:38:35 paragan: aha 05:38:37 paragan: cool 05:38:57 paragan: thanks for reviews 05:39:15 :) 05:39:19 fedbot: bug 825148 05:39:22 fujiwarat: Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825148 medium, medium, ---, nobody, NEW , Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-ibus - IBus gnome-shell-extension 05:39:34 fujiwarat: thanks 05:40:36 * tagoh added i18n-bugs into Cc 05:40:39 anything more? 05:41:52 thanks 05:42:55 okay, shall we move on then? 05:43:47 #topic Fonts and Rendering 05:43:56 any updates or concerns to share on fonts and rendering? 05:44:26 .bug 795327 05:44:29 pravins: Bug 795327 [ta_IN] Request to add Lohit Tamil Classical with old Tamil ligatures of -aa and -ai - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795327 05:44:34 .bug 807068 05:44:37 pravins: Bug 807068 [ta_IN] Please fine-tune glyphs of Tamil numerals and one symbol in Lohit Tamil font - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807068 05:44:57 i have worked on these bug, reported tested and gave positive feedback for same, will build those soon 05:45:18 aha 05:46:34 okay, thanks for fixing anyway. 05:47:06 anything more? 05:49:44 fwiw I'm discussing in the fontconfig list now to support the feature of adding lang prior to build the pattern. this would be supposed to improve selecting the better font on even english locale. 05:50:41 tagoh: you means specifiying lang somewhere in .spec file? 05:51:22 no. we have two plans so far. one is to set the env var. one is to write fonts.conf to do so. 05:51:40 aha, got it. 05:52:42 it will works effectively if the config has any lang specific rules as we do in CIJK fonts. 05:53:16 anything more? 05:54:41 okay, guess better move on. 05:54:48 #topic Open Floor 05:55:00 is there any more topics we are missing in the agenda? 05:56:28 if not, let's close the meeting shortly 05:57:37 okay, thanks everyone for the meeting! 05:57:41 #endmeeting