05:30:29 #startmeeting i18n 05:30:29 Meeting started Tue Jun 26 05:30:29 2018 UTC. 05:30:29 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 05:30:29 The chair is tagoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 05:30:29 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 05:30:29 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:30:29 #meetingname i18n 05:30:29 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:30:29 #topic agenda and roll call 05:30:29 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2018-06-26 05:30:36 ☺ 05:30:58 hi 05:31:08 hi ☺️ 05:31:10 hi 05:31:14 hi 05:32:12 #chair mfabian epico pravins bbarve fujiwarat 05:32:12 Current chairs: bbarve epico fujiwarat mfabian pravins tagoh 05:32:48 parag is away today so I'm running i18n meeting today 05:34:56 hi 05:35:23 #chair suanand_ juhp 05:35:23 Current chairs: bbarve epico fujiwarat juhp mfabian pravins suanand_ tagoh 05:35:36 okay, let's get started. 05:35:39 hi 05:35:47 #topic Upcoming schedule 05:35:48 #info 2018-07-03 Change Checkpoint: Proposal submission deadline (System Wide Changes) 05:35:48 #info 2018-07-11 Mass Rebuild 05:35:48 #info 2018-07-24 Change Checkpoint: Proposal submission deadline (Self Contained Changes) 05:35:48 #info 2018-07-31 Software String Freeze 05:36:12 change proposal deadline for system-wide is coming. 05:37:03 will follow it up on later session though, just keep it in mind if you are planning to submit any proposal 05:37:56 #topic No assignee issues 05:37:57 #info #98: Hackathon during flock 2018 (pravins) 05:37:57 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/98 05:38:12 any updates on this topic? 05:38:55 pravins: ^ 05:39:04 oops 05:39:18 I know pravins has proposed a session on test automation 05:39:40 i will add that link to this ticket. 05:39:42 hi 05:39:44 I am also thinking to propose something but I haven't finalized yet 05:40:05 my present proposal only talk about QE test automation using OpenQA. 05:40:12 pravins: thanks 05:40:14 * linuxmodder lurks 05:40:37 Flock Round 2 selection starts on: 2 July 2018 05:40:45 ! announce for OpenFloor 05:40:57 pravins: ah yes 05:41:22 but did not heard any selection from round-1 05:41:38 Maybe soon? 05:42:17 hope so. 05:43:14 tagoh: overall, we were early planning for whole i18n hackathon but not it turned out to be smaller hackfests. 05:43:24 Alex Eng also proposed workshop on Zanata 05:43:24 suanand_ also proposed Transtats talk I think? 05:43:28 https://pagure.io/flock/issues 05:43:32 aha 05:43:50 yeah, issue #31 and #38 05:44:41 https://pagure.io/flock/issue/33 is for test automation 05:45:41 I think a hackathon/fad like session would be positive 05:46:22 +1 05:46:55 anything else from us for proposal? 05:47:06 pravins: half-day talk? :) 05:47:26 or you mean discussion? 05:47:35 * tagoh added links in the ticket. 05:47:56 half-day hackfest, now talk :) 05:48:04 s/now/not 05:48:11 okay 05:48:17 tagoh: thank you 👍 05:48:25 tagoh++ 05:48:25 pravins: Karma for tagoh changed to 1 (for the f28 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 05:49:47 pravins, may I make a request at open floor ?> 05:49:55 pravins: maybe we could broaden to i18n workshop? I don't want to remove your momentum/focus on OpenQA? 05:50:03 linuxmodder: how about now? 05:50:19 s/?$// 05:50:35 linuxmodder: is it about Flock? 05:50:48 no but i18n 05:51:07 okay, then maybe OpenFloor better, thanks 05:52:18 I didn't know Fedora OpenQA already tests Japanese input 05:52:25 juhp: i am fine with that. 05:52:56 linuxmodder: yes 05:53:13 I mean I can also propose a i18n workshop but maybe better to join forces efforts perhaps I thought? 05:53:44 yeah, got your point. I think good to initial propose on same ticket and see what Bex suggesting. 05:54:04 Though I can't think of anything higher priority than automated testing right now really and also depends who will be present... 05:54:10 in fact from facilities perspective, it will be easy for organizers as well. 05:54:11 guess it depends on the scope? 05:54:17 indeed 05:54:22 pravins: right 05:54:40 Let me add a comment first and we can discuss more there and maybe rename the ticket? 05:54:55 sure 05:56:56 anything else? 05:57:04 Suggestions are welceom though for the scope :) 05:57:07 welcome 05:57:28 right 05:58:15 What is our other highest priority (priorities) for F29+ that could benefit from work at Flock? 06:00:25 fonts and OSK? 06:01:03 epico: aha 06:01:36 epico: any particular for fonts? 06:02:27 Or I could ask for suggestions for the hackfest title? :) 06:02:47 Particularly from those planning to attend :) 06:03:36 maybe pango, and we discuss about font components together. 06:03:43 okay 06:04:08 pravins: do you have particular focus/goal for the OpenQA at Flock? 06:04:27 anyway I don't want to take up too much time here, though it is important 06:05:13 I thought something like "i18n development and OpenQA test automation" 06:05:33 juhp: yeah, automating IME, installation/post installation. 06:05:34 of course development is very broad... 06:05:41 pravins: i see 06:05:46 we could update the title once we decide more detailed scope later 06:05:52 so not particularly fonts this time? 06:05:55 sure 06:05:58 and also see, if we can create some good framework for fonts test automation 06:06:14 nope, not font specific. 06:06:43 For fonts planning some different than OpenQA, it might be simple script or some existing framework. 06:06:45 how about development plan for Fedora 29+? 06:06:53 yeah, that can be good title. 06:06:54 I posted a comment 06:07:00 epico: aha 06:07:14 epico: feel free to comment with ideas on the ticket 06:07:20 okay 06:07:47 yep 06:07:51 thanks juhp 06:08:05 okay, let's move on to the next topic then 06:08:20 #info #99: Tracker for Fedora 29 Changes (pnemade) 06:08:20 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/99 06:08:31 ERRTOOMANYMAYBES ;) 06:08:33 sure 06:09:09 just updated the ticket though, thanks for submitting ibus 1.5.19 proposal. 06:09:25 anything else proposals for f29 from us? 06:09:51 tagoh: apart from yours? :) 06:10:05 I was about to submit one for noto though, would be nice to review it if anyone has a time 06:10:10 juhp: yes 06:13:03 as pointed out on the schedule, the deadline for system-wide proposal is in one week. still have a time for self contained though, please make sure if you are planning to submit any. 06:14:11 move on to the next topic then 06:14:14 #info #100: Fedora 27 Bug triaging (pnemade) 06:14:14 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/100 06:14:43 fujiwarat: is it already in Rawhide? 06:15:35 juhp: Sorry, which bug are you talking about? 06:15:46 juhp: I can see 1.5.18 only in koji. so guess not yet? 06:16:00 fujiwarat: I meant the new emoji UI 06:16:28 juhp: Ah, ok, it's available in rawhide and copr f28. 06:16:35 thanks 06:17:48 63 i18n-related bugs for f27 keeps open. 06:18:42 nice to have a little time to triage them and move to the appropriate release if needed. 06:19:12 Now the ibus internal patch of emoji rendering using harfbuzz was deleted in rawhide. 06:19:25 fujiwarat: aha 06:19:30 tagoh: yes 06:20:22 #info #101: Fedora 29 i18n test day (pnemade) 06:20:22 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/101 06:20:55 guess nothing to discuss about test day so far? 06:21:56 good to start working on updating/improving test cases earlier though 06:22:32 #topic Open Floor 06:22:50 okay, so anything else we want to discuss prior to close this meeting? 06:23:39 linuxmodder: do you have anything? 06:24:24 Was gonna ask for help with Issues 9 and 10 from https://pagure.io/Free-Media/Housekeeping/issues 06:24:51 mostly translating and promoting in less served regions 06:25:13 would be a massive help to FranciscoD and I 06:25:47 tagoh, pravins ^ 06:25:56 #link https://pagure.io/Free-Media/Housekeeping/issue/9 06:26:03 https://pagure.io/Free-Media/Housekeeping/issue/10 06:26:17 I need #link ? 06:26:28 juhp: maybe not 06:27:02 juhp, to show in the logs later in the quick and dirty section yes but not to merely show in the logs 06:27:29 / #link is akin to #action somenick sometask 06:27:41 linuxmodder: #9 does not seem to be i18n? or is it? 06:28:18 more an organizational things - sounds like a question for Ambassadors? 06:28:35 it's tied to others namely the existence of those choices in #10 06:29:16 and having it in other langs as such so as to promote and make more responsive to all 06:29:30 linuxmodder: I think posting to the l10n team is the right step 06:29:39 linuxmodder: yes 06:29:50 l10nor i18n ? 06:30:13 but nothing we help directly with #9 I think 06:30:21 linuxmodder: l10n ;) 06:30:34 localization 06:30:36 where team = list 06:30:39 linuxmodder: for #9, i think good to have centralize ticket, since if we split then we need more eyes to keep track of it. (P.S Not related with this meeting) 06:30:41 maybe I'm conflating the SIGs then 06:31:22 pravins: +1 06:31:25 Does Localization still have regular meetings? 06:31:25 * pravins commented. 06:31:55 juhp: nope, jibec conducted few meetings but not heard anything after that. 06:31:59 linuxmodder: Fedora i18n doesn't do translation 06:32:04 okay 06:32:44 so l10n does translations then ?> 06:32:53 linuxmodder: trans@lists.fedoraproject.org 06:32:58 linuxmodder: please ask l10n team. 06:32:59 yes 06:33:03 if so what is i18n then as I'm obviously conflating SIGs 06:33:20 juhp, will do 06:33:20 linuxmodder: we work on fonts, rendering, input methods etc 06:33:31 cool 06:33:35 linuxmodder++ 06:33:35 juhp: Karma for linuxmodder changed to 6 (for the f28 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 06:33:39 ah my bad and sorry for the noise 06:33:43 no worries 06:34:12 any ideas on readable fonts for those forms are always welcome tho 06:34:46 linuxmodder: link? 06:35:11 juhp, mostly #10 mentioned here 06:35:23 the freemedia form 06:36:01 yeah I see the git repo... 06:37:47 okay, anything else we want to discuss? 06:38:19 linuxmodder: default fonts may be okay 06:38:30 for other languages I mean 06:38:41 nfm and sorry for the unrelated noise 06:38:57 it;s quite okay 06:39:13 Glad we could help 06:40:24 should we have another name to avoid confusion? but anyway 06:40:38 for this meeting? 06:40:43 oh I have one topic 06:40:50 revamping #fedora-i18n 06:40:56 hehe 06:41:01 or the SIG name 06:41:13 To what though? 06:41:49 Maybe I should open a ticket for that discussion 06:42:39 #fedora-g11n seems to be just a msgbus flood... 06:42:39 to make our work obvious in the name or so. it may becomes not simple though 06:42:56 hm, right 06:42:58 Maybe another ticket... 06:43:43 that = #fedora-i18n ... 06:44:30 though I don't see much discussions on the channel 06:45:21 juhp: if we need to take an action immediately, please go ahead otherwise good to open a ticket and discuss in next meeting? 06:45:46 not urgent 06:46:06 The two topics seem connected though 06:46:19 I am not opposed to rebranding, *if* we can come up with a better name :) 06:46:38 The channel still exists ... 06:46:41 indeed 06:46:58 A few hardcore holdouts lol 06:47:36 hehe 06:47:58 So maybe the name discussion should come first... 06:48:11 Though I am struggling 06:49:00 okay, let's stop here then 06:49:15 thanks everyone for the meeting! 06:49:16 It's a perennial problem but I don't know if there is a good solution - good to discussion ideas anyway 06:49:19 thanks 06:49:28 #endmeeting