16:00:01 #startmeeting IRC Support SIG (2010-10-28) 16:00:01 Meeting started Thu Oct 28 16:00:01 2010 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:01 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:01 #meetingname irc-support-sig 16:00:01 #topic init process 16:00:02 The meeting name has been set to 'irc-support-sig' 16:00:11 who all is around for the irc support sig meeting? 16:00:13 * dcr226 16:00:46 * Southern_Gentlem 16:00:52 * Lnxmad_ ! 16:01:17 * thomasj here 16:01:46 Bacon 16:02:11 ok, lets go ahead and get started... 16:02:19 #topic Week in review 16:02:19 http://fedora.theglaserfamily.org/ircstats/fedora-weekly.html 16:02:47 anything anyone would like to point out from last week? 16:02:55 it's been pretty quiet from what I have seen. 16:03:12 Next week will be F14 release... I expect it to be a bit more active then. :) 16:03:21 Lots of bullshit users taking up a lot of bandwidth for no reason 16:03:24 * mock is late 16:03:42 been busier toward the end of the week, so its picking up for release time I think 16:04:00 repo problems about 10 hours ago for a bit (f14), returning 403#s 16:04:08 * nirik should be around for release day. Will probibly also post about doing a release party in #fedora-social again... 16:04:26 nirik, we are already seeing some crying that nvidia driver not working in f14 16:04:45 not working? or not available yet? 16:04:52 not working 16:05:02 huh. ok. 16:05:06 propieritary 16:05:13 Users with crying that it's our problem that nvidia's old driver does not support our current xorg 16:05:21 * nirik shrugs. I guess have them file at bugzilla.rpmfusion.org 16:05:24 * dcr226 thinks its a good time to note, that the new fpaste --sysinfo includes loads of 3D and GPU info 16:06:38 ok, if nothing else for week in review, will move on. 16:06:47 #topic Tickets 16:06:48 https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/report/1 16:07:08 3 tickets this week. 16:07:15 I am pretty sure it has been mentioned before but oping yourself as a form of intimidation is sad. If the situation is bad enough you need ops then kick/ban whatever. 16:07:26 #14 fedora 13 wireless issues - https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/14 16:07:41 EvilBob, its worked for me before fwiw 16:07:59 kudos for dcr226 there on the wireless issue. 16:08:06 It's like pointing a gun, if you are willing to do so you better be damn willing to kill something, IMO anyhow. 16:08:11 EvilBob, otoh, its also sparked folks off in the past towards me so *shrug* 16:08:13 not the gun thing again.. 16:08:21 thanks nirik 16:08:43 #16 - success with opensource nvidia drivers :) - https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/16 16:08:49 again dcr226++ 16:09:23 #15 pleased with channel - https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/15 16:09:37 This one was for kronos003 being helpfull. 16:09:55 EvilBob: yeah, I would mostly agree. 16:10:52 * Southern_Gentlem motions to close the tickets 16:10:52 anyone have anything further on tickets? 16:11:03 anyone want to step up to close them out this week? 16:11:09 i will 16:11:23 thanks Southern_Gentlem 16:12:11 So far almost all the feedback has been positive. Do remember to point people who seem to be having issues/bad time at it too... negative feedback can help us learn and improve too. 16:13:25 #topic Community Working Group 16:13:36 The board is forming a Community working group. 16:13:44 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rdieter/Draft_Fedora_Community_Working_Group 16:14:20 * rdieter lurks for comments or questions 16:14:52 it's not fully clear what it's job/mandate will be yet, but it seeks to improve communication and try and and help in any of the various community areas. 16:15:03 If it's going to put rules and regulations on IRC expect most op's to leave 16:15:16 The Fedora Police... Yay! 16:15:18 They are also looking for nominations to it: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2010-October/009547.html 16:15:35 Sonar_Gal: thats not my understanding of what it will do. 16:15:39 EvilBob: remember, you said you may want to be on it. :) 16:15:39 * mock gets an application to the fedora police academy 16:16:16 rdieter, could you give an example of a scenario where the group would function? 16:16:25 EvilBob: you and me can be partners. we'll do good cop, bad cop. 16:16:42 rdieter: Hopefully it will be comprised mainly of realistic and logical parties 16:16:48 to be clear job-wise, the group will largely define their own job. what ever it takes to improvie community relations, help minimize/resolve any conflict 16:17:41 partner with existing support groups, sigs, committees 16:18:46 rdieter: so it would be above most of the existing groups, and be a place people could go to if the existing feedback/support channels didn't resolve their issues? 16:19:00 How long is "membership"? How is the first round of members decided? and from there on out? 16:19:12 nirik: that's a fair assessment 16:19:22 EvilBob: the group has an initial charter of one year 16:19:37 initial members will be appointed by the board 16:19:58 hope to get that done within a week or 2 16:20:02 So after the first year it's effectiveness would be re-assessed? 16:20:15 EvilBob: yes (or it will just go away) 16:20:52 So how do I get on the list? 16:20:55 rdieter, the initial members will assumedly be nominated by the community though? 16:20:56 ;^) 16:21:03 the kde project implemented this a couple years ago with some good results, from which I shamelessly borrowed the idea 16:21:45 dcr226: yes, nominations open 16:21:56 cool 16:22:03 anyhow, we should nominate folks we think would work well on this... and try and work with the new group as we can on irc related issues. 16:22:07 (though I do try to contact each nominee asking them if they're interested of course, prior to consideration by the board) 16:22:25 rdieter, for sure 16:22:57 I just wanted to bring it up here to announce it's existance and see if some folks from our community would like to participate. 16:23:07 thus the call for self nomination 16:23:16 any other questions on this topic? 16:23:33 How does the nomination happen? 16:23:42 Southern_Gentlem, self nomination? surely that can't happen? 16:23:43 send to the list? Call someone? 16:23:49 EvilBob: just tell me or any board member, that you're interested 16:23:58 I have rdieter's number if anyone needs it... 16:24:23 rdieter: Sign me up then 16:24:32 EvilBob: gotcha, thanks. 16:24:50 * dcr226 +1's for EvilBob 16:25:08 thanks for answering questions on this rdieter 16:25:17 Thanks Rex 16:25:37 * rdieter yays 16:25:40 * tk009 thinks it is an interesting idea but to vague atm 16:25:41 anything more on this? or shall we move on? 16:25:57 Keep them doggies rollin' 16:26:04 #topic Open Floor 16:26:11 Anyone have anything for open floor? 16:26:14 hicham: you had something? 16:26:33 I kind of blurted mine out during the weekly review 16:26:46 nirik : how does nomination work ? 16:27:21 hicham: good question. First, I think we were not adding any new ops for a bit because we wanted to get a feedback process in place. That is now in place... so should we open up things again? 16:27:26 hicham: One of the existing ops asks you if you are interested and more or less sponsors you 16:27:36 * mock thought nomination was the act of nomming one's food to completion 16:27:45 nirik, open it back up I think 16:27:53 nirik: I would +1 the reopening 16:28:02 any objections to re-opening things? 16:28:04 +1 reopening 16:28:09 * nirik is fine with that 16:28:49 #agreed Will reopen to new operator's now that we have a feedback process in place. 16:29:07 what are the reqs? 16:29:11 nirik: the process I described above will still be the standard? 16:29:22 * hicham likes the feedback process 16:29:32 Lnxmad_, you get nominated and voted in 16:29:38 EvilBob: I think that may be what we agreed on last, but I would have to check back on old meetings. We should really write up a wiki page. 16:29:49 Lnxmad_, nominations are done by existing ops, as is the voting 16:30:26 step 1) be active in #fedora and show that you can handle keeping the channel running smoothly. 16:30:34 Self nominations or asking for ops is discouraged I think more or less by freenode 16:30:51 step 2) get an existing op to feel that you would be good to help out with operator duties. 16:30:53 I would have to check the ppages 16:31:06 step 3) existing ops vote and you are approved, or try again in a while. 16:31:33 Thanks nirik 16:32:06 Someone has to be willing to stick their neck out for you more or less 16:32:36 * dcr226 wonders if the nominations are still in the meeting, or on the ml 16:32:51 ML IIRC 16:33:03 noms can be in meeting 16:33:27 * mock noms bacon during the meeting 16:33:35 also, we never figured out voting rules really. ;) 16:33:50 thats a biggy 16:34:27 I think it's good to nominate in public (mailing list or meeting) and have a week for questions/pondering and then vote in public (meeting) the following week. 16:34:34 nirik: a two week voting period, requesting votes be sent to the list 16:34:36 * dcr226 motions to freeze nominations until we're all totally agreed on the rules around voting 16:34:45 s/agreed/clear maybe 16:34:46 second 16:34:57 yeah, probibly wise. 16:35:06 I agree 16:35:09 nirik: that will allow ops not able to make the meeting to have a voice 16:35:12 * nirik notes when he says 'list' he means list, not the alias. 16:35:18 nirik, we probably all have the same idea, but I think its good to clarify it 16:35:24 yeah, agreed. 16:35:41 would anyone like to wite up some possible proposals for us to look at ? 16:36:03 I still disagree with handling peoples dirty laundry in public 16:36:06 I will 16:36:22 proposal that is, not handle dirty laundry :-p 16:36:25 You -1 someone then they are all "Why do you hate me" 16:36:43 too much drama 16:36:50 well, I'll note that all other fedora goups vote in public. 16:36:56 weekly ops meetings... 16:37:04 dicuss in there 16:37:06 ie, fesco for provenpackager/sponsors, etc. 16:37:12 discuss* 16:37:31 I dislike private meetings. Fedora is a open project. 16:37:56 the board has private meetings 16:38:03 * dcr226 de-registers #fedora-broomcupboard 16:38:16 yeah... wish they didn't. :) 16:38:42 I guess it doesnt matter 16:38:44 I guess I can try and write up some ideas for next week... pretty busy tho, so not sure how far I will get. 16:38:48 people know when they are not liked anyway 16:38:57 no problem talking about them... 16:39:00 infront of them 16:39:13 apologies 16:39:52 Yeah, we are all busy this week 16:40:06 well, you can say "sorry I don't feel you are ready for this" rather than "I hate you because: $dirty laundry". 16:40:17 +1 16:40:29 DiscordianUK: you did not miss much, we asked for objections to resuming nominations for new ops 16:40:31 show respect 16:40:40 no commen 16:40:41 t 16:40:49 ahhh ok 16:40:51 only you bob.. 16:40:54 lol 16:40:57 :p 16:41:03 anyhow, I'll try and draft some ideas. 16:41:08 anything else for open floor? 16:41:27 nirik: Lets push that out to two weeks to address it again 16:41:46 yeah, we need to come up with a known/written up plan. 16:41:56 nirik: next week we will have too much time taken up with the release day autopsy 16:42:12 possibly. we can see if we have anything by then. ;) 16:42:26 yeah holiday weekend for anyone with kids this weekend and release next week 16:42:47 oh? oh yeah... that holiday. ;) 16:42:57 turkey day 16:43:07 ok, will close out in minute if nothing else comes up. 16:43:10 Lnxmad_: you're a turkey everyday 16:43:22 turkey bacon? 16:43:26 Lnxmad_, Candy weekend 16:43:33 bacon on turkey 16:43:38 yum 16:43:45 #endmeeting