18:00:00 #startmeeting IRC Support SIG (2013-08-22) 18:00:00 Meeting started Thu Aug 22 18:00:00 2013 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:01 #meetingname irc-support-sig 18:00:01 #topic init process 18:00:01 The meeting name has been set to 'irc-support-sig' 18:00:07 morning everyone 18:00:13 * EvilBob 18:00:17 Hello 18:00:51 * randomuser made it somehow 18:01:07 * nirik will wait a minute for more folks, then start in 18:01:17 randomuser: You didn't use the teleporter again did you... 18:01:29 ;) 18:01:55 #topic Week(s) in review 18:01:59 if I had a teleporter, I'd be a much happier person 18:02:10 anyone have trends or common issues we are seeing more of lately? 18:02:51 I've not really noticed any new trends off hand. 18:03:00 Nor me 18:03:46 I've not been that active the past week or so. 18:03:49 ok, shall we move on to tickets then? 18:04:02 EvilBob: yeah, I've been pretty busy too... but try and keep an eye out when I can anyhow 18:04:20 #topic ticket #155 OP complaint - EvilBob 18:04:23 https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/155 18:04:56 I believe EvilBob did the right thing 18:04:58 so, nothing to do here. I don't understand why someone would get so upset about being warned. 18:05:20 I've also had to admonish folks about -away recently 18:05:21 no reply from them in ticket. 18:05:38 proposal: close -> wontfix 18:05:43 jnix is of course a resident in #rhel 18:05:43 user's major problem surrounds the incorrect assumption that nick-changes aren't present in the FAQ. They are. No response from OP, close the ticket 18:05:47 +1 18:06:02 DiscordianUK, not relevant 18:06:05 Just for the record... 18:06:35 nirik, +1 18:06:37 The ticket was invalid from the start, I am not now nor have I ever been a channel op in #fedora 18:06:48 EvilBob: also true. 18:06:53 ok, shall we move on then? 18:06:55 Indeed 18:07:08 +1 for self-policing communities, then 18:07:29 #topic ticket #156 maltreatment and abuse of power in #fedora-social 18:07:32 https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/156 18:08:00 so, EvilBob and nix talked, this seems to be all taking offense at something someone said and getting all worked up 18:08:10 I acted to stop someone who was just retreading the same ground repeatedly 18:08:21 also some other random people have been jumping on the ticket who were not there or don't realize this was in social 18:08:21 and quieted them 18:08:24 I discussed this ticket, my part of it anyhow, with nix\(nixfas) and we left the discussion on positive terms 18:09:11 In that case I suggest we close the ticket with no action required 18:09:47 right, so my proposal is we ask everyone to try and relax and not take things so seriously, and if offense is taken to appologize when none is offered 18:10:05 I'll go with that +1 18:11:18 counter proposals? more discussion? 18:12:07 I think it's OK to close at this time, if nix and fenrus02 want to get in to it deeper they can do so privately or re-open 18:12:09 I think sometimes a +q is needed to quell a contentious discussion; the person acted on isn't especially more or less to blame 18:12:27 right. to reduce the 'heat' of the channel. 18:12:48 randomuser: and sometimes sadly the person that gets the +q is not greater offender initially 18:13:11 so I'd suggest stating it that way - not taking sides, but making it clear that the goal is only to place a time out on the *topic* 18:13:16 EOF 18:13:19 * nirik nods. 18:13:41 sometimes I have +q the less aggressive person just because I know that they will not fight more after and the more agressive party has no one to fight with at the time. 18:13:45 That's a good view 18:14:21 right. I think people misconstrue the quiets sometimes. 18:14:42 I always try to explain when possible 18:14:51 yep. 18:15:09 ok, further discussion on this one, or move on? 18:15:36 I think it's OK to close at this time, if nix and fenrus02 want to get in to it deeper they can do so privately or re-open 18:15:45 yeah, thats fine with me. 18:15:58 and by "private" I don't mean PM 18:16:16 poor choice of words... "Off the list" 18:16:21 right 18:16:29 DEFAULT TO OPEN! 18:16:32 #topic ticket #157 Support for US Embargoed Nations (#fedora FAQ) 18:16:39 https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/157 18:16:43 fun one. ;) 18:17:11 I think replacing our embargoed entry with a more general one on help will make some people happy and also improves things... 18:17:17 IMO this should stay as stated 18:17:28 I am +1 with nirik's proposal 18:17:39 WORKSFORME 18:17:39 This section of the FAQ was added for a reason 18:17:58 EvilBob: how about this... we replace it with the general one, and mail legal asking them if there's a reason for the specific one that needs to be there. If they say yes, we re-add it? 18:18:11 rewording legalistic copy seems sensitive 18:18:16 until we check the revision history, mailing list, trac tickets and IRC logs... it should stay. 18:18:16 I tried to look at discussion around when it was added, but couldn't find it. 18:18:16 +1 to communicating with legal 18:18:27 (it's a sticky topic) 18:18:29 no ticket leaped out, or irc meeting 18:18:55 there was something that happened that lead to it being suggested. 18:18:57 but I know it was discussed. Just can't recall the details. 18:19:10 They say memory is the second thing to go... I forget what the first is. 18:19:16 can we have 2 weeks to look in to the history deeper? 18:19:34 if we can't find the specifics we can change it. 18:19:46 I'd second two weeks 18:19:48 why does it matter? is there a major issue with nirik's revised copy? 18:19:57 if not..let it fly, and let people calm down 18:20:10 dcr226: we are wondering if legal asked us to add that, in which case it might be bad to remove it. 18:20:10 I am happy with nirik's draft 18:20:13 does nirik's rewording somehow invalidate that you can refuse to assist a user from an embargo'd country? 18:20:14 dcr226: Without looking for the reason it was added, we don't know 18:20:34 I see no point in antagonizing a situation over the wording of a sentence when very few people care about it 18:20:34 * nirik shrugs. I guess we can wait and try and gather more info 18:20:58 people being "calm" about embargoes and assumed freedoms is never going to happen 18:21:10 I'm also fine with changing it and asking for more info to put it back... 18:21:15 I can't remember why it was added either..just remember it being added 18:21:39 2 weeks should be enough time to be diligent in our actions 18:21:42 if one wanted to gloss over the issue, embargo status could be listed as one of many reasons that someone might not get helped; others might include "nobody available knows the answer" 18:22:20 Or in the case of one recent case : because I don't use that 18:22:23 randomuser: I started to list some things in my last draft, but I think that gets negative soon... or could... 18:22:49 yeah, it would be easy to get too wordy there. I like your draft nirik, fwiw 18:23:14 also, when you add lists of things people assume it's just them... and there's more reasons than I can think of to stop helping someone. ;) 18:23:44 true, i withdraw the comment :) 18:24:07 I may or may not agree with the embargo, the point is that we IMO have an obligation to protect Red Hat from unneeded scrutiny in exchange for their generous ownership of Fedora™ 18:25:10 I'm still +1 with nirik's proposal 18:25:31 On the other hand, perhaps the DOD and DOJ should be made aware that Red Hat does little to prevent "munitions" that they produce from getting in to the hands of the "enemy" 18:25:49 wow 18:25:54 offtopic. 18:25:59 That could potentially solve all the problems 18:26:22 nope, I don't see how it ever could 18:26:40 IIRC, it was never demanded of the sig by Red Hat to ever include that line in the FAQ 18:26:42 we shouldn't get into policy debates at the project level or the international level; the question is one of presentation in the FAQ 18:26:59 that being said, a lot of hassle would be saved by simply deleting that line, and moving on with our lives 18:27:02 leave it to fpl and or legal 18:27:06 ^^ 18:27:35 ask Counsel if we can't agree here 18:27:48 randomuser: we can't bury our heads in the sand and ignore the Facts 18:27:51 ok, how about: 18:28:07 2 weeks is all I asked for to make sure we are not making a mistake 18:28:14 add new general entry now, leave embargoed one for a week, ping legal, if they don't care about us having it, remove it then. 18:28:31 nirik, +1 18:28:36 nirik, wfm. may want fpl's buy-in as well though 18:28:47 nirik, because they are the ones going to be pinged about it in case of questions 18:28:47 EvilBob: I don't look forward to 2 weeks of people piling on to the ticket. ;) 18:28:53 Okay I'll support nirik's revised proposal 18:29:04 DiscordianUK, I think we can just assume you're with nirik 18:29:07 :) 18:29:14 fenrus02, is that still rbergeron ? 18:29:21 nirik: close the ticket, stating it will be removed in 2 weeks pending further investigation 18:29:31 EvilBob: compromise on 1 week? 18:29:37 dcr226, sure! (not kept track of politics much, but i think it has not changed) 18:29:39 (relatively rhetorical, but a reasonable excuse to nick-highlight) :) 18:30:08 nirik: I was hoping for some time AFTER the "Labor Day weekend" to make sure I have time and resources to check it out. 18:30:23 * nirik looks at calendar, is that coming up? 18:30:34 nirik: I don't have access to all my logs until after the 2nd of Sept 18:31:02 well, I would think we would get a reply in a week, if only a 'please stand by while we consider it' 18:31:03 Sept 5th is "2 weeks" 18:31:26 I'm against the irredentist (never help anyone from an embargoed country) mentality dcr226 18:31:56 I dont care what you are for, or against in honesty 18:32:27 * nirik sighs. I'd prefer to just deal with this, 2 weeks seems too long to me. 18:32:32 just noting that you were +1 to everything nirik uttered...and I was getting the idea 18:32:33 :) 18:32:55 * nirik comes up with some crazy proposal for DiscordianUK to agree with 18:32:59 dcr226: He likes beans 18:33:02 nirik, ginger people 18:33:09 LOL 18:33:20 * nirik is one. ;) 18:33:34 a bean? 18:33:39 :) 18:33:56 The longer the ticket stays open the more crud it will accumulate 18:33:58 isn't "delete the entry" a useful compromise? 18:34:13 on the grounds that the sig was never forced to actually add it in the first place? 18:34:20 dcr226: well, we don't know, we can't recall. 18:34:36 Heh 18:34:53 anyhow, I don't even the time and resources needed in 1 week to check this out, I would need 2 weeks. I really don't think that is asking too much even if every embargoed person comments on the ticket. 18:34:57 if there is a reason for it to be there, I would think legal could tell us in 1 week. 18:35:19 EvilBob: it's more legal looking into it, no? it doesn't need to be on you 18:35:30 anyhow, I don't HAVE the time and resources needed in 1 week to check this out, I would need 2 weeks. I really don't think that is asking too much even if every embargoed person comments on the ticket. 18:35:50 nirik: I may not be something that we need to bother them with 18:35:50 you shouldn't need to. 18:36:08 I don't think it's a big problem to send an email. 18:36:51 * nirik would be happy to send it off. wait a week and see. 18:37:02 here's a suggestion: 18:37:18 proposal: give EvilBob another week if legal does not reply authoritatively 18:37:43 randomuser: sure, you mean if they don't reply in a week or don't say yes or no? 18:38:00 Close the ticket with "None of us are lawyers, but its sad that you guys are offended by the wording. We're going to contact legal straight away and ask for their help implementing a more comforably worded entry for you. Will have a reply ASAP and act accordingly" 18:38:15 i mean, if they don't reply - or do reply but not with directly actionable information 18:38:32 * EvilBob hates involving lawyers in anything 18:38:39 dcr226: fine with me. 18:39:08 ESPECIALLY when they have already been involved with it getting placed there originally 18:39:22 randomuser: thats also fine with me. 18:39:22 EvilBob, I dont mind..if I'm not paying 18:39:50 :) 18:39:50 so: close per dcr226's suggestion, mail legal, wait a week, if no reply add a week for EvilBob to dig more. 18:40:14 No consensus... push it a week and then give me a week to look deeper in to it. 18:40:14 Reluctantly +1 18:40:21 ;) 18:40:54 I think there needs to be a "We're dealing with this, but its gonna take a little while" approach to the ticket to stop it getting out of hand 18:41:02 dcr226: yes, I think thats a great idea. 18:41:13 dcr226: I agree 18:41:41 okay yes 18:41:45 Let's send a provisional response saying "We're looking into this... please be patient while we get you a final answer" 18:41:57 while we dig a bit deeper, etc. 18:42:26 right, and I'm fine with closing it, since there's no more action to take place in the ticket. 18:42:34 I'd be seriously tempted to close it from further comments, to stop it spiralling 18:42:46 as I stated 15 minutes ago " nirik: close the ticket, stating it will be removed in 2 weeks pending further investigation" 18:43:01 right, is everyone ok with that plan then? 18:43:13 rock and roll! (+1) 18:43:38 If I can't find it in my logs and stuff then... we have no reason to keep it. 18:43:48 cool. 18:43:56 any further discussion on this? or move on? 18:44:05 move it 18:44:40 #topic Open Floor 18:44:48 dcr226: you had some old tickets for us to look at closing? 18:44:58 oops, yeah..moment 18:45:10 ok, this one first: https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/147 18:45:27 " This was discussed at the 2013-05-16 meeting, calling for more discussion. " 18:45:35 yeah, and nothing happened. 18:45:40 op doesn't seem to much care since (3 months ago), can we just kill it? 18:45:53 Close it 18:45:54 I'm fine with closing it with a note asking them to reopen if they have specific changes 18:45:54 kill 'em all! 18:46:10 yeah, ideal 18:46:28 next one? 18:46:34 next 18:46:36 https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/107 18:46:55 I started this, didn't really work how I originally intended..don't think it needs to be alive anymore 18:47:14 yeah, it was mostly done. 18:47:21 dcr226: that one is so old it's maybe time to create a new one to cut the dead weight... 18:47:23 ;) 18:47:25 I think one or two were not cleaned up, but overall it's finished. 18:47:26 wait, there's a SIG membership list for validity of +1's here ? :P 18:47:37 randomuser: in theory yeah 18:47:38 EvilBob, Hah 18:48:05 and the last one was https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig/ticket/125 18:48:36 does anyone know if FranciscoD did anything with the wiki? or shall we just leave my comment in the wind for another week? 18:48:38 That got done, but needs redone. ;) 18:48:45 I'd say ping the ticket and ask him to update it? 18:48:50 yeah 18:49:09 ok..so we can just leave that until he wakes..it was very recently that I made a change 18:49:22 yeah, he's been around so hopefully he will chime in. 18:49:27 any other items for open floor? 18:50:07 I'm spent 18:50:30 heh. 18:50:40 ok, would anyone like to close tickets this week? 18:50:47 if not I can do it, but might not be for a bit. 18:51:06 I can do it in a sec 18:51:13 dcr226: that would be lovely. thank you. 18:51:24 ok, thanks for coming everyone! 18:51:27 #endmeeting