16:00:21 #startmeeting java-maint-sig Meeting (2021-02-18) 16:00:21 Meeting started Thu Feb 18 16:00:21 2021 UTC. 16:00:21 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:21 The chair is decathorpe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:21 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:21 The meeting name has been set to 'java-maint-sig_meeting_(2021-02-18)' 16:00:35 #meetingname java-maint-sig 16:00:35 The meeting name has been set to 'java-maint-sig' 16:00:39 #topic Roll Call 16:00:56 * cyberpear listens in 16:01:09 welcome 16:01:49 hi 16:02:07 hello 16:02:13 #chair mizdebsk 16:02:13 Current chairs: decathorpe mizdebsk 16:02:17 #chair loganjerry 16:02:17 Current chairs: decathorpe loganjerry mizdebsk 16:02:37 wow so many people ;) 16:03:35 What up? 16:03:43 hey mbooth :-) 16:03:45 #chair mbooth 16:03:45 Current chairs: decathorpe loganjerry mbooth mizdebsk 16:04:06 #link https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig/issue/15 Agenda 16:04:43 I think loganjerry already replied to my jansi PR, so we can skip that? 16:05:14 Yes I think nothing to do there until the next jline release. 16:05:50 thanks for confirming 16:06:15 #topic maven-antrun-plugin 3.0.0? 16:06:18 #link https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maven-antrun-plugin/pull-request/1 16:06:49 I'd like to update that one at some point, but it removes some deprecated config options ... 16:07:22 some dependent packages were retired in the meantime, but for the others, there's not much we can do, right? 16:07:28 it should be fairly easy to port packages to 3.0.0 16:07:49 What is the scope of breakage, just tasks->target? 16:07:59 I tried to look into it, but the maven-antrun-plugin docs were rather unhelpful :) 16:08:10 mbooth, yes 16:08:14 the fix is like https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/mbi/rpms/apache-commons-collections/c/c5b1591 16:08:33 Cool, well, easy peasy then :-) 16:08:43 oh that's easier than I thought -.- 16:10:21 There's a similar problem with exec-maven-plugin 3.0.0 but I seem to have not written that down ... oh well. 16:10:25 #info porting packages to maven-antrun-plugin 3.0.0 typically involves renaming to 16:10:39 yeah thanks 16:10:59 no idea about exec 16:11:00 #topic objectweb-asm 9 16:11:05 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881197 16:11:52 asm is backwards-compatible, so this should be rather straightforward i'd say 16:12:04 backwards compatible sounds nice 16:12:12 anybody up for submitting a PR? ;-) 16:12:27 Asm is actually really good at back-compat, pretty rare in java land 16:12:52 I guess I can do this update, since it's useful for Eclipse 16:13:05 yeah, since version 4 their kept their promise of backwards-compatibility 16:13:14 that's great, thanks! 16:13:52 i don't think there were any troubles with it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/mbi/rpms/objectweb-asm/c/aa30cccee326d6bb4de96b2f1b6c9f34a6a65434?branch=master 16:14:33 I only had issues with asm when I tried to update xbean beyond 4.15 16:14:56 What even uses xbean? 16:15:18 plexus-containers, hawtjni 16:15:44 so pretty much everything transitively depends on it 16:16:00 xbean uses a xbean-asm-shaded module 16:16:27 #chair mkoncek 16:16:27 Current chairs: decathorpe loganjerry mbooth mizdebsk mkoncek 16:16:29 i was going to say there is a patch for xbean 16:17:00 ok, then another problem solved :+1: 16:17:16 #topic Jakarta EE 9 16:17:26 mbooth: I think we don't need those updates yet, right? 16:18:56 Yeah I would like to hold until Eclipse and Jetty move to it upstream, IIRC Jetty 11 has, but we didn't adapt Eclipse yet 16:19:39 great, let me know once things start depending on the new versions. 16:19:45 Will do 16:20:15 #topic Open Floor 16:20:32 that was pretty much it from my side. does anybody else have anything? 16:21:09 decathorpe: I like your copr rebuilds of dependent packages for testing PR -- I don't remember if I previously asked, is that script available some place? 16:21:37 uhmmm yeah, 16:22:06 it's here: https://github.com/fedora-stewardship/fedora-stewardship.github.io/blob/master/scripts/review_pr.py 16:22:27 but I have since fixed a few small things, and intend to push a new version to the java-maint-sig pagure 16:22:37 is this meeting for java-sig or java-maint-sig? or do you consider both groups equivalent? 16:23:07 mizdebsk: well that's a rather philosophical question 16:25:35 do we want to agree on the meeting time? 16:25:58 for some of us in Europe current time is out of our regular hours 16:27:07 I picked the one where most people had indicated to have time, but the slot one hour earlier had same number of positive responses. 16:27:45 would that work better? 16:28:16 for me personally yes, one hour earlier is definitely better 16:29:47 mbooth, loganjerry: would having the meeting one hour earlier work for you too? 16:29:56 Yes 16:30:00 Fine by me 16:30:27 well that settles it then :-) I'll update the fedocal entry. 16:30:54 thx 16:31:51 anything else? if not, I'll close the meeting in a few minutes. 16:32:52 (as always, feel free to look at the kanban board, I'm updating it regularly: https://teams.fedoraproject.org/project/java-package-maintainer-sig/kanban ) 16:35:48 ok, thanks everybody for showing up, see you in two weeks! 16:35:51 #endmeeting