15:07:25 #startmeeting kde-sig 15:07:25 Meeting started Tue Jan 22 15:07:25 2013 UTC. The chair is rdieter. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:07:25 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:07:30 #meetingname kde-sig 15:07:30 The meeting name has been set to 'kde-sig' 15:07:38 hola 15:07:42 #topic roll call 15:07:52 here 15:07:56 who's all around today? 15:07:56 * jgrulich is present 15:08:18 * ltinkl is present 15:08:18 (finally fixed my calendar notifications working) 15:08:24 than, Kevin_Kofler, kde*foo: ping 15:08:31 dvratil: woo :) 15:08:58 Present. 15:09:14 note to self: configure akonadi-google calendar sync on my new box here. 15:09:45 (my phone works fine in this regard :) 15:10:08 #info dvratil jgrulich rdieter ltinkl Kevin_Kofler present 15:10:15 #chair dvratil jgrulich ltinkl Kevin_Kofler 15:10:15 Current chairs: Kevin_Kofler dvratil jgrulich ltinkl rdieter 15:10:20 #topic agenda 15:10:54 alrighty, what to discuss today? Kevin thought of "f19 features" earlier 15:11:09 * rdieter can give 4.9.98 status report 15:12:13 rdieter: are you planning to include translations as well? :) 15:12:48 eventually, but if someone with a faster net speed could help with that part, would be appreciated 15:13:10 kscreen update 15:13:28 ok, let's start off with that. 15:13:32 #topic kscreen update 15:13:39 dvratil: do tell :) 15:13:43 so, we have first official release 15:13:50 * rdieter yays 15:13:57 not yet announced because afiestas is terribly slow in writing blog posts 15:14:03 update is already in bodhi, so please test 15:14:14 bodhi ... for f18? 15:14:23 and f17 15:14:37 dvratil: didn't see any update yet 15:15:22 and for those who don't know, in f19 we made with rdieter kscreen and the old randr module to conflicting, so users can pick which one they want to use 15:15:25 I'd recommend adding instructions on how to manually disable xrandrmonitor kded, that's required for proper function, isn't it? 15:15:38 ltinkl, https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kscreen-0.0.71-1.fc18 15:15:47 I only added the subpkg to kde-4.10 prerelease builds so far 15:16:31 dvratil: I'd also recommend bundling kscreen/libkscreen into a single update 15:17:17 dvratil: why do I get kscreen-0.9.0 as an update? :) 15:17:34 ltinkl: that's the old update, the new one isn't pushe dyet 15:17:42 ltinkl, because 0.9 is the git one, the official one is 1:00.0.71 15:17:58 rdieter, should I add the intructions to kscreen description? 15:18:04 dvratil: and while we're at it, those older updates should probably get unpushed 15:18:09 so 0.9 is older than 0.0.71? :o 15:18:14 dvratil: +instructions, yes I think so 15:18:34 ok 15:18:46 dvratil: furhter, I can backport the kded_xrandrmonitor subpkg packaging to f17/f18 too if you think that would help 15:18:54 I can unpush the old kscreen before this hits updates-testing 15:19:34 4.10 goes to f18 only, right? 15:19:49 dvratil: to f18 only... eventually, right. 15:20:10 so I'd wait with this till 4.10 probably 15:20:35 dvratil: this = the kded_xrandrmonitor subpkg? ok. we can live with giving manual instructions until then 15:21:00 ok, I'll update the update tonight 15:23:05 ok, moving on... 15:23:10 #topic kde-4.9.98 status 15:23:23 I'm uploading the remainder of 4.9.98 to rawhide now 15:23:35 got started during the fudcon hackfests this weekend 15:23:56 will finish up doing f18 kde-unstable builds later today as well 15:24:59 Great. 15:25:20 i've one big concern about doing 4.10 update for f18 officially 15:26:07 And that is? 15:26:12 on doing 4.9 => 4.10 update, one can't logout/reboot the existing 4.9 session (due to kscreenlocker changes, I believe) 15:26:40 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310486 15:26:45 (or maybe ksmserver) 15:27:13 tis a shame we don't have offline update support in apper yet. :( 15:27:31 Hmmm, fun… 15:28:45 otherwise, these 4.9.9? pre-releaeses have been a pleasure to use. 15:29:29 I think the first step to figuring out where this comes from is to find where the connection of some object :: logoutRequested() to KSMShutdownDlg::slotLogout() is happening and why that "some object" is null. 15:32:53 yeah, i'm more than a little surprised there's been so little upstream input so far. I hope we can agree this is likely a blocker to doing a f18 update 15:33:32 Oh, BTW, I also e-mailed upstream about the libkdcraw/libjpeg8 issue, but so far they've been very unhelpful. 15:34:06 I just got one upstream developer blaming Fedora for everything and no other replies, in particular no answer to my questions. 15:34:10 thanks for that. yes and no, I think it's been a useful discussion 15:34:46 Re the upgrade issue, I think upstream doesn't officially support upgrading KDE SC from within a running session. :-( 15:35:29 So they're not going to give that issue high priority, I'm afraid. 15:36:00 maybe so. :( anyway, anything else 4.9.9? related? 15:36:39 I already spoke to dantti 15:36:44 it's on his TODO list 15:36:45 So these are the connections: http://lxr.kde.org/source/kde/kde-workspace/ksmserver/shutdowndlg.cpp#249 15:37:14 k, let's continue that discussion post-meeting ... 15:37:44 For libkdcraw, I'll have to have a look directly at the code, seeing how upstream either refuses or is unable to answer my questions. 15:37:48 :-( 15:38:12 ltinkl: oh great, any time-frame? as in, something we could use in time for 4.10.1 or 4.10.2 perhaps? 15:38:44 that would allow us to side-step the issue a bit 15:38:54 rdieter: most probably, he said he'd do it soon 15:39:25 ok 15:39:28 moving on... 15:39:40 #topic f19 features 15:40:25 sounds like than agreed/volunteered to work on kde4.10 feature page for f19. anything else we should feature-ize? kscreen? 15:40:56 rdieter: good idea, dvratil? :) 15:41:16 dvratil: re: kscreen, we could roll that into the kde4.10 bigger feature too, means a little less work, but also means it won't get as much visibility either 15:41:19 we should really "advertise" this 15:41:42 I'm for having it as a bigger feature 15:41:46 * rdieter agrees with ltinkl , show off the awesomeness 15:42:25 dvratil: are you familiar with the feature process? and writing it up on the wiki? need help? 15:42:36 I have no idea what to do :) 15:42:49 My guess for the ksmserver issue: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kde-workspace/repository/entry/ksmserver/shutdowndlg.cpp?rev=KDE%2F4.9#L244 – this theme file is probably missing in 4.10 (different theme names?). 15:42:58 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/19/FeatureList , http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy 15:43:08 dvratil: ^^ helpful links to get started 15:43:23 thanks 15:43:28 Kevin_Kofler: nice, you make it sound easy :) 15:43:39 That code didn't change though. But maybe the "theme" argument did. 15:43:49 But as I said, it's just a guess, might be entirely wrong, mind you. 15:44:46 To verify it, compare /usr/share/kde4/apps/ksmserver/themes/*/main.qml on 4.9 vs. 4.10, did themes get added/removed there? 15:44:49 Kevin_Kofler: mind posting your findings in the bug? that should help others continue debugging too 15:45:10 * rdieter sees /usr/share/kde4/apps/ksmserver/themes/default/main.qml on 4.9.98 15:46:01 file seems same on 4.9.5 too 15:46:49 Must be more complicated then. :-/ Maybe a compatibility issue, like the theme from 4.10 using stuff only supported by 4.10's libplasma, so it fails when the 4.9 ksmserver tries to load it? 15:47:48 dvratil: Re kscreen, yes, a separate feature makes sense, assuming it actually works. :-) 15:48:56 Kevin_Kofler, it works pretty well and we are still improving it :) 15:49:45 #topic open discussion 15:49:51 ok, anything else to discuss today? 15:50:08 rdieter: where is the appropriate place to file bugs when trying out the release candidate packages? 15:50:59 sgallagh: either rh bugzilla or kde bugzilla, depending on if you suspect it to be a downstream or upstream issue. if in doubt, rh bugzilla. 15:51:38 sgallagh: or poke someone in #fedora-kde to followup , if it's something nasty 15:51:44 rdieter: Ok, wasn't sure if RH BZ was permissible since they're not official packages 15:52:07 sgallagh: it's fine, it's rebuilds of what's in rawhide, so fair game essentially 15:52:11 * sgallagh became convinced at FUDCon that he wants back on KDE :) 15:52:20 Great. :-) 15:52:51 some of those big room discussions were... interesting to say the least. 15:52:54 Looking at the ksmserver QML's history, I don't see any incompatible change to that between 4.9 and 4.10. 15:55:24 I posted the little I was able to find out to: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310486#c6 15:55:58 thanks 15:56:05 * rdieter will end meeting in 2 min 15:58:43 thanks everyone 15:58:46 #endmeeting