21:00:05 #startmeeting Fedora Magazine 21:00:05 Meeting started Thu Sep 10 21:00:05 2015 UTC. The chair is stickster. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 21:00:09 #meetingname magazine 21:00:09 The meeting name has been set to 'magazine' 21:00:11 #topic Roll call! 21:00:17 .hello ankursinha 21:00:18 FranciscoD_: ankursinha 'Ankur Sinha' 21:00:20 o/ 21:00:25 \o 21:00:26 :D 21:01:42 I suspect this meeting will be more fun than the last one... now that we cleared out the moldy pitches, we can spend more time setting up publishing schedule for existing drafts 21:01:54 I hope some more people show up :-\ 21:02:00 * FranciscoD_ is guilty of not finising the dnf post yet :( 21:02:50 FranciscoD_: We'll get there, don't worry :-) 21:03:05 * stickster will wait until :05 to get more people 21:03:09 ++ 21:03:21 two more minutes to drink more wine ;) 21:03:23 * FranciscoD_ tops up 21:06:42 FranciscoD_: Hm, no one else yet :-( 21:07:14 :( 21:07:18 FranciscoD_: OK, let's at least do a little bit of what we can 21:07:21 #chair FranciscoD_ 21:07:21 Current chairs: FranciscoD_ stickster 21:07:56 #topic Last week's publishing timeline 21:08:02 #info No new articles this week :-( 21:08:15 * ryanlerch is here! 21:08:19 YAY! 21:08:21 #chair ryanlerch 21:08:21 Current chairs: FranciscoD_ ryanlerch stickster 21:08:27 we were pretty lonely :-) 21:08:48 lol 21:08:51 FranciscoD, thanks for coming again! 21:08:54 So this past week was not great, with no stories -- BUT! We are well on our way to fixing that very problem! 21:09:02 FranciscoD, are you still in AU? 21:09:09 nah, moved to the UK now 21:09:14 3 years here - phd 21:09:17 then we'll see ;) 21:09:17 #topic Pitch votes 21:10:08 One of the pitches here is wrong -- it should be a draft 21:10:35 Stellarium 21:11:02 It was a pitch last week, wasn't it? 21:11:16 Yeah, that's right FranciscoD_ -- but it wasn't clear someone was actually writing it 21:11:55 It's in the draft pile right now, is someone interested in writing it? 21:12:09 * stickster raises a hand, since there aren't many people to say yes today :-) 21:12:17 I'm just pulling up the minutes from last week to refresh what we did 21:12:37 * ryanlerch would like to, but doesnt really know much about space :) 21:12:48 #action stickster move Stellarium to draft status as agreed last week 21:13:05 yeah, it is a good idea for a post :) 21:13:12 There's a well known astro department here, folks working with hubble and all that, but none of them are open source contributors :( 21:13:23 #topic Perl 6 on backends MoarVM and JVM 21:13:29 #undo 21:13:29 Removing item from minutes: 21:13:37 #topic Pitch votes 21:13:46 #info Perl 6 article 21:13:58 have heard back from Gerd on this one? 21:14:11 Last time we agreed to give Gerd some time... heard back nothing at this point. 21:14:22 So I'm -1 to go to draft 21:14:26 -1 from me on this one too 21:14:34 -1 if we haven't received a response 21:14:43 #agreed move to trash, since no response from author 21:15:00 done 21:15:03 yay! pitch queue cleared! 21:15:07 WOOHOO! 21:15:10 time to fill it up again? :) 21:15:30 ryanlerch: Yes indeed. Shall we reserve 10 minutes starting at :50 to do that? 21:15:37 stickster, ack! 21:15:47 #info At :50 we'll keep time to refresh pitch queue 21:15:59 #topic Draft status 21:16:17 #info Goal is to determine if each draft is ready for review (Pending Review status) 21:16:52 #info Newer version of software 21:17:13 #link http://fedoramagazine.org/?p=5333&preview=true 21:18:05 I think this may need some editing, but in the interest of getting something in queue, I'd propose this one for next status 21:18:27 The editor's touch is needed to explain some of the jargon 21:18:34 +1 21:18:42 i'll take this one 21:18:46 ryanlerch: I'm not sure if I'm setting the bar correctly here for PR status -- do chime in 21:19:08 I don't want to be premature, but I also doubt Matthew has time to jump in and rewrite heavily 21:19:28 i think this is at a good level to be taken on 21:19:45 it's matt too, so happy to set the bar a little lower ;) 21:19:51 Cool cool... ryanlerch, can you set to Pending Review, and let's agree on a publication date so this will be on the schedule? 21:21:08 lets aim for tuesday? 21:21:24 ryanlerch: Good thinking 21:21:29 it will give time for some back and forth with matt and timezones 21:21:52 #agreed Move to Pending Review, ryanlerch to edit and publish on 2015-09-15 21:22:06 #info IBus typing booster 21:22:14 #link http://fedoramagazine.org/?p=7025&preview=true 21:22:39 * ryanlerch gets lost with input methods, so probably not a good one for me 21:22:56 I'm not incredibly conversant with them, but I'm game 21:23:10 I'll take it on, for publication Wednesday? 21:24:03 sure :P 21:24:32 oops, forgot: 21:24:45 #action ryanlerch edit "new software" post for publication 2015-09-15 21:25:02 #action stickster edit "ibus typing booster" post for publication 2015-09-16 21:25:55 #info DNF package management 21:25:56 #link http://fedoramagazine.org/?p=7023&preview=true 21:26:02 I haven't worked on it yet 21:26:07 I promise to do it over the weekend 21:26:28 FranciscoD_: OK, how about we agree to check in with you on Monday, and see if we can publish on Thursday? 21:26:35 sounds good 21:26:41 ryanlerch: Let me know if I'm being too aggressive with publishing schedule 21:27:51 we always have the marketing list to communicate updates too :) 21:28:01 stickster, nah, i like it :) 21:28:06 right on 21:28:09 * roshi shows up late 21:28:24 #idea Can we set up one more editorial metadata field for "Expect to Publish" date? 21:28:45 #chair roshi 21:28:45 Current chairs: FranciscoD_ roshi ryanlerch stickster 21:29:27 #action FranciscoD_ to finish draft by Monday and let the list know so we can edit -- expect to publish Thu 2015-09-17 21:29:30 ++ 21:29:59 hi roshi! 21:30:17 o/ ryanlerch and co :) 21:30:28 roshi: must be busy testing something :P 21:30:53 actually, this time it was fixing a broken car so family could get done what needs done :) 21:31:27 woah 21:31:30 * roshi reads backscroll 21:31:55 #info Upstream monitoring system 21:32:00 #link http://fedoramagazine.org/?p=7381&preview=true 21:32:19 FranciscoD_: This is another article of yours, I believe... shall we set this one a week out, so you don't have to do so much at one time? 21:32:33 I think this one's been around for a while actually 21:32:53 and the upstream monitoring system isn't really new any more 21:33:03 * FranciscoD_ goes to check the infra announcement date 21:33:18 FranciscoD_: Good point... do we want to keep it, and rewrite slightly so it's less about "new" and more about "here's a helpful way to get upstream monitoring, did you know about it?" 21:33:40 The story is rather a good one 21:33:46 I think a rewrite explaining how its helpful is in order now 21:34:14 yeah, that makes the most sense to me 21:35:15 FranciscoD_: And perhaps less about just Fedora packaging (although you can mention that), and maybe a bit more about how people who aren't necessarily Fedora packagers can use it? 21:35:22 aye 21:35:24 makes sense 21:35:41 I'll read up pingou's blog on everything anitya can do now and update it 21:35:57 There have been quite a few releases - I remember seeing mails on the infra list 21:36:31 FranciscoD_: sounds good... here's an example, someone may be able to run the fedmsg-notify GUI on their Fedora workstation and know if fedmsg gets a "new upstream release" message for one or more releases they care about, even if they don't package 21:36:46 * FranciscoD_ notes 21:36:47 That would take it away from being an article only aimed at Fedora packagers 21:36:58 ryanlerch: what do you think? 21:37:01 Yeah, will make it more user centric, makes sense 21:37:16 sounds pretty good to me! 21:37:26 I can also include how anitya now attempts scratch builds with the new version to make it easier for the packager 21:37:33 which in turn ensures that users get their updates sooner 21:37:34 and so on 21:37:38 Yes! 21:37:42 FranciscoD_: Does an extra week sound good for that? 21:37:47 Or is that not enough time? 21:37:47 Sure 21:37:51 Enough time 21:37:54 OK 21:38:21 I'll try and do it over the weekend, and the extra week should be quite sufficient. 21:38:34 #action FranciscoD_ revise draft of anitya article by Mon 2015-09-21, for publication Thu 2015-09-24 21:38:44 I'll volunteer to edit for you 21:38:50 #action stickster to edit for FranciscoD_ 21:39:11 #info Playing with systemctl/systemd 21:39:13 #link http://fedoramagazine.org/?p=9227&preview=true 21:40:03 was thinking about this one this week -- might be good to make it more targeted, and possibly part of a series 21:40:19 i.e. the first one could be a tutorial about unit files 21:40:45 ryanlerch: Yeah, I agree -- That would be *really* beneficial. And I love the idea of starting by talking about unit files. We could draw a lot from existing docs, just by simplifying the message 21:41:04 that would help people out a lot 21:41:12 ryanlerch: What if we had a private post to start collaborating on an outline for the series? 21:41:12 also this -- https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/understanding-systemd-units-and-unit-files 21:41:27 * roshi just mashes systemd buttons until it does what he wants or crashes most of the time 21:41:51 * FranciscoD_ hopes roshi has a different system for the car 21:42:00 ryanlerch: That's awesome -- the CC-BY-NC-SA might be problematic but the concept/execution there is really good 21:42:11 cars are a lot easier - working on them is how I relax :p 21:43:48 ryanlerch: roshi FranciscoD_ should we go ahead and trash this draft? 21:43:57 (to be replaced by a series) 21:44:07 stickster, agreed 21:44:12 this won't fit into the series? 21:44:25 are we going to reach out to the author to see if they want to help with the series? 21:44:30 roshi: It's very general, and is more about service vs. systemctl 21:44:34 series++ 21:44:37 stickster: that's old news IMO 21:44:39 there really isnt that much in the postbh 21:44:42 roshi: oh, absolutely 21:45:06 sure, trash it then 21:45:11 anyone that's used fedora in the past two releases will now be aware of at least a few changes when it comes to systemctl 21:45:13 I'm all for asking the author to collaborate on some additional bits, not sure whether this was a "drop and run" article but we can give benefit of the doubt 21:45:40 #agreed Trash this draft, and replace with a new series on systemd use 21:46:16 This may come in handy: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet 21:46:26 #action ryanlerch start either a post, private post, or wiki page where we can outline the series 21:46:28 we give this out to folks on #fedora all the time 21:46:44 FranciscoD_: Exactly -- I feel like that's a link from our article (maybe in multiple places) 21:46:59 Anything else to do on this one? 21:47:27 #action stickster Email Ashutosh to see if he wants to collaborate on series 21:48:24 #info fpaste article 21:48:28 #link http://fedoramagazine.org/?p=8882&preview=true 21:48:47 #info This was just moved to draft last week, but we didn't get a chance to assign it. roshi -- are you game to do one? 21:49:15 write it, or edit it? 21:49:27 roshi: Write it -- you'd have > 1 week to do a draft, since our schedule next week Tue-Thu is full :-) 21:49:39 mattdm is writing all the content from here on out, right? :p 21:49:44 * FranciscoD_ is the fpaste maintainer 21:49:47 sure thing 21:49:52 I use fpaste all the time 21:49:52 roshi: And this one doesn't have to be a novel, either 21:49:55 So I'll be happy to answer any questions :P 21:50:02 ha! Synergy 21:50:03 wish my friends on other distros had it most of the time 21:50:04 roshi++ 21:50:11 QA relies pretty heavy on it 21:50:27 sweet, thanks FranciscoD_ :) 21:50:48 anything I can do for QA :D 21:50:52 roshi: So how about a draft by Friday Sep 18, and we'll publish Tue 2015-Sep-22 21:51:05 I think that should work 21:51:06 I <3 the <3 21:51:36 #action roshi draft by Fri 2015-09-18, let the marketing@ list know (or ping stickster in IRC), to be published Tue 2015-09-22 21:51:43 FranciscoD_ and I go way back, we went to different highschools together 21:51:48 My *pink* wine fits right in with this picture. Maybe everything really is planned 21:51:51 roshi: LOL 21:51:53 OK, time to finish out with MOAR PITCHES 21:51:58 :p 21:52:12 ooo 21:52:18 #topic More pitches 21:52:20 * FranciscoD_ has a pitch, but probably not for next week 21:52:34 So, the cheatcube is in the process of being updated 21:52:38 FranciscoD, throw it into the mix 21:52:39 FranciscoD_: Pitches can sit until we're ready for them :-) 21:52:39 to use dnf and all that 21:52:56 https://fedorahosted.org/design-team/ticket/401 21:52:57 FranciscoD_: So an article on how to download the cheatcube and make it? 21:53:03 yes! 21:53:05 LOVE IT 21:53:09 the design team gave me feedback already 21:53:13 +93501212- 21:53:36 I'll submit the new version this weekend and they'll discuss it in their next meeting 21:54:03 srsly, +1 21:54:03 if I do everything right, it should pass inspection and be ready to use 2 weeks! 21:54:12 FranciscoD, add it to the pitch pile!!!!! 21:54:23 #action FranciscoD_ Throw cheatcube topic in a post, set status to "Pitch," and save 21:54:35 Anyone else? 21:54:37 yay! 21:54:40 I haz a pitch! 21:54:41 Use #idea to record for minutes 21:54:57 we're almost up to beta now 21:55:04 should we start building up to release? 21:55:08 tiny bits on whats new? 21:55:11 and things? 21:55:20 i noticed that the Unity IDE is now available on linux -- but with ubuntu packages only 21:55:22 I know the docs team froze beats last week I think 21:55:39 FranciscoD_: That's a good idea too 21:55:45 might be nice to have one covering how to get it installed on Fedora 21:56:08 ryanlerch: is there a copr or something? 21:56:12 btw: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Documentation_beats 21:56:28 FranciscoD, no -- it's non-free software 21:56:38 ah :/ 21:57:54 I'll check it out, but I generally stick to vim + terminal, not really an IDE person 21:58:00 rather, vim is the IDE here 21:58:08 +1 to that 21:58:12 FranciscoD_++ 21:58:14 ;p 21:58:25 and now, powerline 21:58:28 ryanlerch: Do you have a link to that? 21:58:29 FranciscoD, its specifically for making games with the Unity game engine 21:58:36 which I use, but don't really know what all I can do with it yet... 21:58:37 ryanlerch: Is that http://unityide.com/ ? 21:58:55 http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2015/08/unity3d-linux-build 21:59:42 tbh, I didn't know unity was a game engite 21:59:51 stickster, no, not http://unityide.com/ 21:59:55 I always think of *buntus desktop when unity comes up 22:00:04 OK -- I'm looking at the article 22:00:15 Wow, a big .sh binary installer :-\ 22:00:50 * stickster dreads telling people to do 'curl | sh -' 22:01:28 * roshi will never tell someone to do that 22:01:42 yea 22:01:43 OK, so if you have more pitches, you guys know what to do -- save it as a "Pitch" status post in WP, and we'll cover it in the next agenda! 22:01:51 'curl ' open in vim, read, edit, then run 22:01:57 I think the dnf upgrade plugin will make a good post 22:02:01 it replaces fedup 22:02:16 FranciscoD_: If all goes well, no one should notice that -- they just run 'fedup' 22:02:17 I tested it on a vm and it worked great, but it probably needs more testing right now 22:02:27 it does 22:02:35 stickster: ah? I didn't know that 22:02:38 I think we've got some fun down the line when it comes to upgrades... 22:02:40 I ran the dnf commands and all that 22:02:42 OK, we need to close meeting, because I have to run :-) 22:02:46 ++ 22:02:49 lots of work to do 22:02:53 Thank you guys for being awesome and here! 22:02:59 sorry I was late today :( 22:03:02 see you all next week 22:03:04 not a problem! 22:03:06 Thank you for chairing again :) 22:03:08 #endmeeting