#meeting:fedoraproject.org log

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:00:52

!startmeeting Fedora Mindshare Committee - 2025-12-11

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

11:00:54

Meeting started at 2025-12-11 11:00:52 UTC

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

11:00:54

The Meeting name is 'Fedora Mindshare Committee - 2025-12-11'

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:01:04

!meetingname mindshare

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

11:01:04

The Meeting Name is now mindshare

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:01:12

!topic Hello's and Welcomes

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:01:16

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

11:01:17

Justin Wheeler (jflory7) - he / him / his

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:01:23

!group members mindshare

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

11:01:25

Members of mindshare: emma kidney, Greg Sutcliffe, jflory7 (@jflory7:fedora.im, @fca:fedoraproject.org), Joseph Gayoso, lbazan, Sumantro Mukherjee, Akashdeep Dhar

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:01:29

Moin moin, folks!

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:02:10

Yello

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:02:12

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

11:02:13

Akashdeep Dhar (t0xic0der) - he / him / his

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:02:18

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

11:02:20

emma kidney (ekidney) - she / her / hers

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:05:29

So, looks like a small quorum for today. A bit expected perhaps as we get toward the end of the year 🙂

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:05:50

I know Gwmngilfen said he might be lurking but he had some other stuff going on that he has to deal with.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:06:27

We'll kick off, and perhaps some others will arrive in due time. We will focus on discussing the tickets for which we have updates/quorum for!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:06:45

!info Present: @jflory7 @t0xic0der @ekidney

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:07:01

!info Limited quorum today; we will focus on covering the tickets for which we have representation today

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:07:04

!topic Agenda

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:07:19

So, I put this in #mindshare:fedoraproject.org last night, but a quick recap for the logs:

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:07:55

!topic Team Announcements & News

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:07:59

Urgh, wait

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:08:02

!topic Agenda

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:08:15

!info 1. Team Announcements & News

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:08:38

!info 2. #88: Define the remit of Recognition Service in Mindshare, @t0xic0der and @gwmngilfen

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:09:01

!link https://gitlab.com/fedora/mindshare/home/-/issues/88

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:09:27

!info 3. #89: Define Digital Ambassadorship in Mindshare responsibilities, @ekidney and @joseph

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:09:38

!link https://gitlab.com/fedora/mindshare/home/-/issues/89

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:09:48

!link https://gitlab.com/fedora/mindshare/docs/-/merge_requests/10

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:10:10

!info 4. #90: Fedora Budget Collection Process for 2026/27 - Wiki/Old process/New Process

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:10:27

^^ @lbazan, if he comes in toward the end

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:10:40

!link https://gitlab.com/fedora/mindshare/home/-/issues/90

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:10:43

And that's it!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:10:49

Anything else to add?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:11:11

Akashdeep Dhar: Just wanted to ACK your DevConf.in ticket, but I think we will probably vote on this in the New Year? WDYT?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:11:25

Or would you like to discuss it today?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:11:32

Even if we don't vote on it, we could chat about it.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:11:35

I defer to you, sir!

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:11:52

Yeah, kept myself from proposing #91. It is in a good state now and could use attention once we get the names fillled in thee (i.e. January 2026).

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:12:13

OK, sounds good. Worthy of discussion, or do you feel like it is on track so far?

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:12:58

Just on the side update - We have three names now. mattdm's finally coming to India 🎉, jnsamyak has some talks, Shounak Dey (a Pune based Fedora Infrastructure contributor) also plans on being there and finally, yours truly is running the booth and has a talk there.

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:13:12

Fin. Just those updates for now - nothing else. Back to you, sir!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:13:16

Awesome. Then this will be a good announcement to put in the logs 🙂

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:13:22

!info 5. Open floor

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:13:25

Let's get started!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:13:36

!topic Team Announcements & News

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:14:05

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

11:14:06

Greg Sutcliffe (gwmngilfen) - he / him / his

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:14:08

sorry i'm late

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:14:11

!info From Akashdeep Dhar on DevConf India (ticket #91): "We have three names now. @mattdm's finally coming to India 🎉, @jnsamyak has some talks, Shounak Dey (a Pune based Fedora Infrastructure contributor) also plans on being there and finally, and @t0xicoder is running the booth and has a talk there."

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:14:21

!info +Present: @gwmngilfen

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:14:33

Any other news or announcements?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:15:16

!info The Fedora Matrix homeserver went through a major upgrade this week. If you use Matrix on your mobile device with a `fedora.im` account, you can now use the Element X client! It is much faster and better-performing than the Element Classic app. Give it a go if you haven't yet!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:15:44

Something something, data center move, Infrastructure might be a bit dicey for the next week or two? I don't know what services were impacted by the move.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:16:36

!info While we do not yet have budget proposals for FOSDEM 2026 or SCaLE 23x, this will likely come in soon to the Mindshare Committee desk. As much as possible, please keep an eye out for this Mindshare Committee tickets so we can try and make a quick vote before the end of the year. More details on the Wiki pages for both events.

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:16:41

shouldn't be major impact

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:16:43

!link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FOSDEM_2026

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:16:48

!link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SCaLE_23X_Event

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:16:57

https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12955 for details on that

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:17:29

!info There is an ongoing data center migration this week, although the impact on services should be limited. More information is available in a Fedora Infrastructure planning ticket.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:17:31

!link https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12955

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:17:37

Cool cool.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:17:48

Anything else noteworthy?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:18:32

## News and announcements, going once…

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:18:50

## News and announcements, going twice…

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:19:10

## News and announcements, going thrice…

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:19:49

Shazam!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:19:54

!topic #88: Define the remit of Recognition Service in Mindshare, @t0xic0der and @gwmngilfen

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:20:00

!link https://gitlab.com/fedora/mindshare/home/-/issues/88

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:20:11

Akashdeep Dhar, Gwmngilfen: Over to you two!

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:20:53

Apart from the updates from by Gwmngilfen on the community health metrics and myself on the Fedora Badges Revamp Project, I am thinking more on the tangible giveaways to notable and/or active community members in the next year.

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:21:12

Quick links to the previous couple of updates first

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:21:27

!link https://gitlab.com/fedora/mindshare/home/-/issues/88#note_2881014587

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:21:36

!link https://gwmngilfen.fedorapeople.org/contributors/reports/All.html

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:21:46

!link https://gridhead.net/update-on-fedora-badges-revamp-project/

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:22:05

!link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/update-on-fedora-badges-revamp-project/175412

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:22:16

Back to the plan

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:23:12

Cool, I was about to ask for some Meetbot context on the metrics and Badges stuff, for async reading on these ones later. Both of those are important, but might take some more time to make progress in this Mindshare Committee term.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:23:18

I'm curious to discuss more about the swag topic 🙂

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:23:25

With the new fiscal year coming, it is a timely topic!

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:23:26

This is something I am thinking of doing once per release cycle (taking from the idea of Heroes of Fedora that we used to do before). A small swag pack to a group of 20-25 people (based on our capacity and logistics) with a cooldown of two release cycle per selected candidate.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:24:37

What might the selection criteria be for the swag pack?

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:24:49

I have not yet delved deeper into the selection of the said candidates really but this is where [A] Gwmngilfen's script could come in real handy in helping out with the contributors active per the timeline of the said release cycle or [B] Fedora Data WG's outcomes from the readings made from Datanommer per the timeline of the said release cycle.

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:25:23

that seems achievable, given a suitable cut of data

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:25:28

Justin Wheeler: OMG GET OUT OF MY HEAD 😂 You are reading my mind

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:25:35

Heheh.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:25:44

So, could we be hypothetical for a moment?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:25:53

What kinds of activities would be worth counting here?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:26:06

I'm also keenly aware that some activities (e.g. events) are not well-represented in the data, but those take a LOT of work.

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:26:17

Gonna defer to Gwmngilfen on the technicalities of the selection really. He's the data guy but apart from that we can plan on having a badge (because OF COURSE, WHY THE HECK NOT 😂) and some publication of their activities on platforms like Fedora Commblog.

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:27:00

any activity is worth counting 😉 - the key is deciding on relative weights

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:27:29

I'll put this out there in the interest of limited time for our meeting, but the thing I am weighing is (1) as you pitched, a once-release swag pack that we give to a limited pool of contributors for doing something, or (2) narrowing it down to a specific activity or group of activities, and coming up with a recognition campaign for that in the next 1-2 months.

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:27:40

Might seem like a big undertaking but hey, we're doing it twice a year (i.e. once per release cycle) so I say we should at least do this for all the self-driven initiative that we get from the community folks. I am planning on writing an SOP on how we can run this but the soon-est I can start on this is January.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:28:02

Some folks might remember the shirts and postcards we did for the Fedora Localization Team folks some releases ago. It was tied specifically to the activities that went into bringing our current localization stack into play, if I recall correctly.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:28:47

For instance, knowing that Mindshare Committee has a big focus on events, and our budget/fiscal year tends to operate in quarters, what if we need a quarterly event owner recognition, with some kind of limited swag for event owners?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:29:14

The number would be smaller here, but we have the tools today to get this information. We can already likely pick off 6-7 people for January to March that would be "eligible" for this as event owners.

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:29:21

I wanna quickly highlight the cooldown that I mentioned about over here. While we appreciate the continued participation by the folks, we want to incentivize the budding participation of the relatively newer folks in the community or those who have not been actively recently but have become so.

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:29:32

```

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:29:32

```

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:29:32

i.e user, timestamp, area, activity - then we can ut this however you like. But I don't know the dataset well enough know if thats reasonable

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:29:32

user1 | 2025-12-11 09:34 | git | opened_pr

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:29:32

i can work with either, it depends on (a) having the right data, and (b) deciding on the weights. if we can get something like:

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:29:41

And also, making an event owner badge would be possible. Or we evolve the super-old badge that we have for running a Fedora booth/stand.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:30:11

## Time check: Halfway mark, 30m remaining

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:30:21

ugh, timing--, workmen at the door, brb

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:30:27

So, in the interest of time, and knowing that the year-end is nearly upon us…

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:30:30

Here is my pitch to you two!

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:30:32

This is something I got to see from what Gwmngilfen was doing. There was this slope thingy that attribute the change in the activity of a certain individual contributor. As such someone who geared up further from the previous cycle of evaluation is appreciated "more" than someone who has always been an active contributor.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:30:42

(Quick, give Greg action items while he is away! 😄)

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:31:28

Good callouts. We can look into those. Once I am coming around the said SOPs (What do you mean, we should assign the SOP work to Gwmngilfen, Justin Wheeler?)

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:31:40

My pitch to both of you is to develop a strawman/Version 1 proposal on what criteria we might use to evaluate limited-edition swag for the first half of 2026. This could be for the release cycle, it could be in quarters with events, I'll leave that up to you. But if we can come back in the New Year with some ideas on what activities we want to measure with what weights, that would be an awesome start to 2026.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:32:05

Obviously there is some scripting to do on the data side, but I don't want perfect to be the enemy of our progress here.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:32:41

We have lots of events in Q1, and I am seeing the work that event owners are doing behind the scenes to put together their events. It is commendable and there is virtually 0% data in our tools today that will recognize them here

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:33:32

!idea @t0xic0der: A small swag pack to a group of 20-25 people (based on our capacity and logistics) with a cooldown of two release cycle per selected candidate sent once per release cycle.

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:33:34

Sounds like a plan. Do you have a specific deadline when you wanna hear back from us on this? (That way, I don't pester Gwmngilfen when he is FOSDEM <del>just because I most likely won't be able to make it there RIP</del>)

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:33:46

!idea @jflory7: For instance, knowing that Mindshare Committee has a big focus on events, and our budget/fiscal year tends to operate in quarters, what if we need a quarterly event owner recognition, with some kind of limited swag for event owners? The number would be smaller here, but we have the tools today to get this information. We can already likely pick off 6-7 people for January to March that would be "eligible" for this as event owners.

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:34:14

Sounds like a plan. Do you have a specific deadline when you wanna hear back from us on this? (That way, I don't pester Gwmngilfen when he is at FOSDEM <del>just because I most likely won't be able to make it there RIP</del>)

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:34:31

Akashdeep Dhar, Gwmngilfen: I think getting a new GitLab ticket comment in before the year rolls over is ideal. So we can jump right back in for 2026. I am not sure when the two of you will start your year-end holiday leave, so I won't name a specific day, but this calendar month is what I am looking for.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:34:50

Because we all know there is some amnesia brain coming back from the holidays, and if we can get this down in writing while it is fresh and hot, all the better.

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:35:46

Not sure what the logistics would be like to get and ship said swag packs out, but I would love to help put them together 😄

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:35:49

How about a comment under the existing ticket? Then we close that one out in favour of this new one that we'd create to track this specific work. Does that make sense? It also paints a new target for us to follow than the more generic older one of "finding purpose".

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:35:58

!proposed Next steps: @t0xic0der and @gwmngilfen develop a Version 1 proposal on what criteria we might use to evaluate limited-edition swag for the first half of 2026. This could be for the release cycle, it could be in quarters with events, up to them for deciding. This way, we come back in the New Year with some ideas on what activities we want to measure with what weights for a strong start to 2026.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:36:02

This is my proposed `!agreed`

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:36:04

WDYT?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:36:32

Yesssss. If it was not implicitly obvious, you would be involved here as one-half of the Design Team brain trust 😎

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:36:54

Ugh, I get reminded of the times when riecatnor used to do them back in the day. Sure, the in-person events weren't much of thing then but the logistics were quite the pain to get things to folks.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:37:11

Akashdeep Dhar, Gwmngilfen: Are y'all okay with me actioning you on this for December 2025?

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:37:16

+1. Let's do it. (What do you think, Gwmngilfen?)

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:37:32

We will cross the shipping logistics challenge piece when we get to it 😄

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:38:14

We might also adopt new strategies of ordering/creating the swag from inside the country/region where it will go, versus shipping it from 'murica

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:38:32

Because that just makes everything more complicated in a tariff/trade war world 🫠 I digress 😅

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:38:44

(shipping from America making things complicated, I mean)

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:38:55

In the interest of time, I am going to action this, and I think Gwmngilfen won't be upset about it 🙂

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:39:04

!agreed Next steps: @t0xic0der and @gwmngilfen develop a Version 1 proposal on what criteria we might use to evaluate limited-edition swag for the first half of 2026. This could be for the release cycle, it could be in quarters with events, up to them for deciding. This way, we come back in the New Year with some ideas on what activities we want to measure with what weights for a strong start to 2026.

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:39:21

I meant also the packing and putting together if that can be a thing 😄

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:39:24

back

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:39:28

Not a bad idea for countries where we (know we) have more than 10 folks actively contributing to Fedora Project but for the other ones where we don't - Things could be just as tricky.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:40:14

!action @t0xic0der @gwmngilfen Add a new GitLab comment to Mindshare ticket #88 before the end of 2025 with "Version 1" on the criteria we use to run a limited-edition swag campaign to recognize specific activities/contributions in the Fedora Linux 44 Release Cycle or in Q1/Q2 events

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:40:23

OK, I think this is a wrap on this topic!

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:40:23

s/countries/regions/g - Potato Potato

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:40:37

Let's move over to Emma and Joseph's ticket next.

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:40:42

reading up, i think thats a decent plan, though end-of-december is ambitious

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:41:08

we'll need to actually get our hands on some of the data and see what it looks like

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:41:10

!topic #89: Define Digital Ambassadorship in Mindshare responsibilities, @ekidney and @joseph

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:41:16

!link https://gitlab.com/fedora/mindshare/home/-/issues/89

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:41:18

!link https://gitlab.com/fedora/mindshare/docs/-/merge_requests/10

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:41:36

Gwmngilfen: The task is not to get hands-on with the data in December, the task is to be hypothetical and pitch ideas that we _can_ get hands-on with in January!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:41:43

Emma Kidney: Over to you on this one!

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:42:29

I made a MR with the changes mentioned on the ticket! if all looks good I can merge 😄 I see one comment from Akash about a link that I can fix later today.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:43:02

Gotcha. Anything specific worth summarizing on the MR? It is the changes to the Mindshare Committee charter for the digital ambassadorship piece that we discussed last time, right?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:43:19

We can take a quick skim on it now, but it would be an awesome target to merge by the end of this week, latest.

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:43:57

yah I think it was just the changes mentioned on the ticket

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:44:38

I have some thoughts about future consolidating our docs with the Marketing docs about the digital ambassadorship and also documenting what the vetting process would be exactly for the regional accounts etc but I can make tickets and work on that in the new year.

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:46:26

Like would a potential regional account reach out to us or marketing for permission to use the logo, would it be a new issue template etc

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:47:01

OK, I read it all. It looks great to me! There are some tiny AsciiDoc nitpicks, but the important part, the actual written content, looks good and sensible to me. It matches what I remember we discussed last time.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:47:08

"Mindshare aims to provide and maintain these resources and act as a touchpoint for the Marketing team and Digital Ambassadors for support or raising issues. We encourage Digital Ambassadors to help create and maintain these resources also."

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:47:40

Quoting this bit, I think this will be an excellent "next phase" focus in 2026 to help formalize what the providing and maintenance of these resources look like

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:47:46

Just some internal linking of documents. Everything else looks good to me.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:48:38

I know the Marketing Team docs don't get a lot of love. It might be wise to think how Mindshare and Marketing can collaborate on this in the future, you're right. Especially since Mindshare does have a dedicated Marketing Team seat, and the role of Digital Ambassadorship will be maintained in future Mindshare Committee terms too.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:48:54

Yes. An issue template on Forgejo would be excellent!

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:49:20

I love clear next steps 🤠

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:49:23

(OMG. Forgejo. We haven't discussed our own git forge migration plan yet. Luckily we have Akashdeep here to help us bridge that gap though. 😁 In 2026!)

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:49:48

Excellent!

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:50:11

100% I think it would be a great area to work on!!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:50:18

I'll carve out some time to make suggestions on the GitLab MR with the AsciiDoc nitpicks, but I don't have any suggestions or revisions to the content right now.

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:50:29

Thanks 🙂

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:50:31

Let me try and get some of this into Meetbot.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:51:17

!info Emma has proposed a new GitLab Merge Request on the Mindshare Committee charter page, modifying the Digital Ambassadorship section to match what we have been discussing for the last couple of Mindshare Committee meetings. This draft is ready for final review. We should merge it before the end of the year!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:52:02

!info Feedback noted in the meeting acknowledged that the content looks good, but some small adjustments for AsciiDoc are needed (e.g. following the one-sentence-per-line convention, using xref links for linking to other Fedora Docs pages).

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:52:32

!idea @ekidney: Possible collaboration on consolidating Marketing Team and Mindshare Committee docs together for Digital Ambassadorship.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:52:47

!idea @ekidney: Vetting process for regional accounts.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:53:09

!idea @ekidney: Issue templates on Forgejo for some of these types of requests to Mindshare Committee.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:54:19

!proposed Next steps: Aim for a Merge on this Merge Request ideally by EOD on Friday, 12 December. @ekidney can write a comment on ticket #89 with some ideas for 2026 next steps (from the ideas listed above) so we come back in January with a clear focus and plan of action.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:54:28

WDYT of this proposal, Emma Kidney?

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:54:53

sounds good! 🙌

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:55:09

!agreed Next steps: Aim for a Merge on this Merge Request ideally by EOD on Friday, 12 December. @ekidney can write a comment on ticket #89 with some ideas for 2026 next steps (from the ideas listed above) so we come back in January with a clear focus and plan of action.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:55:12

Super.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:55:18

And that leaves us with five minutes remaining!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:55:38

And I do have a hard stop in five minutes for a call with Legal. Flock contract stuff. 🙂

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:55:46

So, I think we need to cut to open floor.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:55:50

!topic Open floor

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:56:04

OK! So, I do need to do some follow-up with Luis Bazan on his issue.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:56:19

I'll wait for him to circle back in the Mindshare Committee chat room on the message from last night.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:56:27

Anyone else have anything to bring up before we wrap?

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:56:36

And uh, I think this is our last meeting of the year!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:56:38

Is that right??

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:56:55

yah it is!!

<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>

11:56:58

Nothing else from my end. Just have a good holiday time with your friends and families, folks!

<@ekidney:matrix.org>

11:57:18

you too!! Hope everyone enjoys the rest 🙂

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

11:57:25

thanks all, have a good break!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:58:55

OK, this looks like a natural wrapping point.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:59:13

Indeed! Folks, have a great year-end, however you celebrate. I hope you have a restful and recharging holiday time.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:59:22

And we will see you in 2026, there is a lot to look forward to! 🎉

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:59:26

Until next time.

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:59:28

Ciao!

<@jflory7:fedora.im>

11:59:29

!endmeeting