15:01:03 #startmeeting modularity_wg 15:01:03 Meeting started Tue Jan 9 15:01:03 2018 UTC. The chair is nils. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:01:03 The meeting name has been set to 'modularity_wg' 15:01:03 #meetingtopic Meeting of the Modularity Working Group (once every two weeks) 15:01:03 #chair dgilmore langdon 15:01:03 Current chairs: dgilmore langdon nils 15:01:14 #topic Roll Call 15:01:19 .hello nphilipp 15:01:20 nils: nphilipp 'Nils Philippsen' 15:01:22 .hello2 15:01:23 langdon: langdon 'Langdon White' 15:02:06 .hello psabata 15:02:07 contyk: psabata 'Petr Ĺ abata' 15:02:43 #chair sct 15:02:43 Current chairs: dgilmore langdon nils sct 15:02:50 .hello sct 15:02:51 sct: sct 'Stephen Tweedie' 15:03:22 #topic Agenda 15:03:25 do we have anything for an agenda? we have a new change that was submitted 15:03:30 No! :D 15:03:40 I would like to see a new Objective for the council 15:03:48 Covering F28 and F29 plans 15:04:13 langdon, mattdm, in that case, just #info it (mattdm wait a sec) 15:04:17 #chair mattdm 15:04:17 Current chairs: dgilmore langdon mattdm nils sct 15:04:25 there 15:05:43 #info a new change proposal for f28 has been submitted: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F28AddonModularity 15:06:01 #info mattdm & langdon would both like to see a new modularity objective 15:06:34 if that's it... 15:06:51 #topic a new change proposal for f28 has been submitted: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F28AddonModularity 15:07:51 langdon? 15:08:52 i don't have much to "add" .. just that it is proposing the new architecture.. basically, that "everything" will still be built in the traditional way.. and then alternate versions of software can be made available in a new repo.. 15:09:08 ahh got it 15:09:25 so the base of fedora won't be "modular" per se.. just that you will have an optional repo that you can collect content from 15:09:46 --> #info formalizes the hybrid approach, traditional Fedora distro with optional modules on top <-- ? 15:10:15 yeah 15:10:58 #info formalizes the hybrid approach, traditional Fedora distro with optional modules on top 15:11:21 #topic mattdm & langdon would both like to see a new modularity objective 15:12:05 basically.. the fedora modularity objective is outdated now.. it doesn't really reflect the next step(s)... so we need a new one to accurately describe the goals and the reasons for those goals 15:12:12 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives#Fedora_Modularization_.28Prototype_Phase.29 15:12:16 that was for F25 :) 15:12:22 Or :-/ as the case may be 15:12:47 https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/modularity-dead-long-live-modularity/ 15:12:56 captures some of it... 15:13:00 mattdm: did we come up with time/day we could collaborate on that this week? 15:13:03 as does the F28 proposal 15:13:09 mattdm, shall I undo that #infoif it's outdated? 15:13:10 langdon: not yet 15:13:28 tomorrow looks good for me 15:13:53 was thinking of going into westford Thursday 15:13:56 tomorrow is my bad day.. i can only do 13h-16h or so 15:14:19 thurs i can do in westford 15:14:32 from about 12 on 15:15:08 ok.. we can sidebar that later 15:15:31 but.. suffice to say.. we need a new objective.. and we would like help.. but we will try and do a strawman first 15:17:46 sounds right :) 15:18:18 langdon: What do you mean by strawman? 15:18:47 geppetto: like a version of the objective to discuss.. hard to talk about a blank sheet of paper.. 15:19:05 Ahh, ok 15:19:14 So more like a draft than a strawman then? 15:19:49 yes :) 15:19:51 a draft. :) 15:22:22 geppetto: yeah.. strawman usually implies something that you can take wild swings at vs a draft which is something that will be close :) 15:22:48 I'm reworking the docs.. have three pages done, can be previewed here: https://asamalik.fedorapeople.org/mod-docs-preview/design/intro.html 15:22:53 .hello2 15:22:54 asamalik: asamalik 'Adam Samalik' 15:23:38 I'm making sure that we are explaining what problems are we trying to solve 15:24:01 how are we trying to solve them in high-level (the design section) 15:24:16 langdon, mattdm, done? 15:24:19 and the specific implementation will follow as we come up with it 15:24:35 so that might be the strawman/draft maybe? 15:24:45 asamalik: what is the intent of that doc? 15:26:18 langdon, mattdm, asamalik: ? 15:26:20 langdon: sorry not sure what do you mean? it's the modularity documentation.. why are we doing it, what are we trying to do, how are we approaching it.. 15:26:53 asamalik: i was somewhat confused.. you are just mentioning it so we could, possibly, use some or all of the content for the objective? 15:27:19 langdon: yes 15:27:27 asamalik: gotcha.. ok 15:28:08 the current docs are outdated, so I'm trying not just update them, but simplify them - especially in the "design" section which I think could be used as that objective 15:28:36 asamalik: yeah... somewhat.. ill read through and steal what we can :) 15:28:42 good 15:28:45 langdon: please :) 15:28:46 :) 15:29:02 ok.. should we wrap it up? 15:29:06 I think so 15:29:29 doesn't look like there's the need for open floor unless something came up in the last half hour :) 15:29:31 sure... just wanted to mention that works on the docs are happening :) 15:29:42 ok, thanks everybody! 15:29:45 #endmeeting