16:04:11 #startmeeting Networking Meeting 16:04:11 Meeting started Wed Oct 26 16:04:11 2016 UTC. The chair is gundalow. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:04:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:04:11 The meeting name has been set to 'networking_meeting' 16:04:33 * caphrim007 here 16:04:37 Agenda as always https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/110 16:04:48 #topic caphrim007's PRs 16:05:06 3158 is complete as per gundalow yesterday 16:05:30 i have rebased 3273 and it is testing now, but will probably come back green 16:05:43 nm its green already 16:06:01 mhite gave shipit to the others 16:06:41 3273 merged 16:07:19 3272 merged 16:07:57 3271 should also be ready 16:08:03 caphrim007: minus points for not getting lcd_display working on virtual machines :P 16:08:09 lol 16:08:14 i know. my bad 16:08:22 Though plus points for actually documenting it 16:08:45 " 16:08:57 i need to replace the filing cabinets holding my desk up with bigip viprions 16:08:57 "description: >" 16:09:04 then i can test lcd 16:09:16 and maybe some earplugs? 16:09:22 How come you have ">" 16:09:44 on which pr 16:09:56 https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-extras/pull/3271/files#diff-891108651bca780943a13ae56dfd9180R115 16:10:25 ahh. i think that was before i discovered that strings can be moved to a new line and dont need the folded scalar yaml 16:10:48 is it causing the docs to bug out? 16:11:25 nah, just querying it 16:11:46 apparently it's valid YAML, so should be fine 16:13:00 all merged 16:13:16 thats all from me this week 16:13:30 https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/pull/5381 ? 16:13:38 Just looked at your PRs, 16:13:49 nitzmahone took care of that yesterday 16:14:15 cool 16:14:19 we were figuring out this win_shell problem and that PR i had was an example 16:14:40 cool 16:16:40 caphrim007: You may wish to create a stable-2.2 branch for https://github.com/F5Networks/f5-ansible if you are now adding in tests for 2.3 16:16:54 for bugfixes? 16:17:16 So you can run the set of tests for 2.2 against Ansible 2.2 16:17:37 We've done the same for stable-2.1 https://github.com/ansible/test-network-modules/branches 16:17:48 ok 16:18:45 Not created the stable-2.1 for test-network-modules yet as we've not added any 2.3 functionality or tests yet 16:19:46 so for 2.2 16:20:00 Not created the stable-2.2* for test-network-modules yet as we've not added any 2.3 functionality or tests yet 16:20:06 sorry, typo 16:20:31 is devel going to be 2.3 though? 16:20:43 and the stable-2.2 will be 2.2 and 2.2.1, 2.2.2, etc? 16:21:54 stable-2.2 = 2.2* 16:22:09 k 16:22:44 minor thing, but worth mentioning since you are already adding in functionality for 2.3 16:23:27 since i have limited ansible cycles, i will tend to only produce bugfixes for 2.2.* 16:23:39 ACK 16:23:40 and everything else will just "move forward" so-to-speak with 2.3 16:24:17 Just means if we make some change to Ansible 2.2 that may impact networking we have the ability to run tests against it 16:24:30 roger that. 16:24:38 cool 16:24:48 Anything else? 16:25:03 i'm good this week. more next week 16:25:07 cool 16:25:09 Thank :) 16:25:11 #endmeeting