15:01:11 #startmeeting "NeuroFedora - 2019-09-12" 15:01:11 Meeting started Thu Sep 12 15:01:11 2019 UTC. 15:01:11 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:01:11 The chair is mhough. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:01:11 The meeting name has been set to '"neurofedora_-_2019-09-12"' 15:01:14 Yeah, 10 am 15:01:28 8am here 15:01:55 #meetingname neurofedora 15:01:55 The meeting name has been set to 'neurofedora' 15:02:03 Francisco was right here, then went for lunch. should be back in a second 15:02:13 * FranciscoD is here 15:02:15 #topic Introductions and Roll call 15:02:21 .hello2 15:02:22 dan1mal: dan1mal 'Danny Lee' 15:02:34 .hello2 15:02:35 mhough: mhough 'Morgan Hough' 15:02:44 .hello2 15:02:45 FranciscoD: Sorry, but you don't exist 15:02:52 Alberto Rodríguez fas bt0dotninja 15:02:53 :( 15:02:56 .fas ankursinha 15:02:57 FranciscoD: ankursinha 'Ankur Sinha' 15:03:00 8O 15:03:49 Do I list everyone after "chair"? 15:04:06 Yeh, that'll work 15:04:29 #info Meetbot command reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:Guide#MeetBot_Commands 15:05:04 .hello2 15:05:05 zbyszek: zbyszek 'Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek' 15:05:52 #chair dan1mal FranciscoD alciregi zbyszek bt0dotninja 15:05:52 Current chairs: FranciscoD alciregi bt0dotninja dan1mal mhough zbyszek 15:06:37 major is probably busy studying for their exams :D 15:07:23 #topic Today's agenda 15:08:43 #info Tasks from last week's meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/neurofedora/neurofedora.2019-09-05-14.59.html 15:09:05 Is there a way to list the action items? 15:09:25 They are at the bottom 15:09:35 C&P ? 15:10:04 mhough: copy and paste, I'm afraid---one by one :( 15:10:11 pagure.issue.comment.added -- bt0dotninja commented on ticket fedora-infrastructure#8159: "Update package descriptions with their summaries." https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8159#comment-597185 15:10:15 okay 15:10:34 I will just go through the agenda first if that's OK 15:10:54 #info Open bugs at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&email1=neuro-sig%40lists.fedoraproject.org&emailassigned_to1=1&emailcc1=1&emaildocs_contact1=1&emaillongdesc1=1&emailqa_contact1=1&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=10455921&query_format=advanced 15:11:25 #info Review of current progress 15:11:32 ++ 15:12:02 #info Action items from previous meeting 15:12:23 #info Neuroscience query of the week 15:12:34 #info Next meeting chair selection 15:12:44 #info Open floor 15:13:21 okay 15:13:56 #topic Tasks from last week's meeting 15:14:30 Anyone like to start? 15:15:30 https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/198 has been updated. 15:16:00 FranciscoD forked the fedora-comps pagure and made edits to https://pagure.io/fork/ankursinha/fedora-comps/blob/neuro-fedora/f/comps-f32.xml.in 15:16:17 let me quickly generate a diff 15:16:25 that include the neuron-modelling-simulators group 15:17:29 https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/tg2z27oYg5EL3FO159uF-w -> our additions 15:18:08 which of these is the change proposal? 15:18:42 This is comps, doesn't require a change proposal. 15:18:59 The labs require a change proposal: 15:19:08 Once the edits are done, we can submit a pull request, right? 15:19:09 okay I am just looking through the action items and trying to match things up 15:19:17 dan1mal: yes, 15:19:26 The diff says "...skipping...". 15:19:35 Some stuff was ommitted. 15:19:52 ugh, hold on 15:20:11 Just pipe to fpaste directly... 15:20:34 https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/a4~V9ixFH7y9UqzN3OLNUg 15:20:51 #info making a neurofedora groups package for installer 15:21:00 zbyszek: too lazy to see what the language option for diffs in fpaste is :P 15:21:28 mhough: we've uncoupled the comps and ks for the moment 15:21:34 When the comps group is ready, we can use that in the ks 15:22:03 okay so this is a ks issue currently? 15:22:19 sorry just trying to mark it in the meeting notes correctly 15:22:31 No, this is comps at the moment 15:22:55 (#199 is ks, which we can do next) 15:22:59 I think that unless there is more software to be added atm, we could submit it. what do you think? 15:23:11 Yeah, please submit the PR> 15:23:16 +1 15:23:17 I was wondering if we could retro-edit 30/31 too or only forward 15:23:22 We can always add more stuff later. 15:23:26 +1 15:23:37 +1 15:23:38 Yes, it is possible to "retro-edit". 15:24:00 it would be nice for people usinf F30 to install the package as a group 15:24:46 we'll need to confirm if all these tools are in F30 first---a few of our packages are only f31+ because of deps 15:24:49 I *think* 15:25:02 We can look into that, though, no biggie 15:25:10 ah i c, im still vague on these sorts of things. no need to add work 15:25:25 #action FranciscoD look at F30 comps, update, open comps PR 15:25:32 #action dan1mal look at F30 comps, update, open comps PR 15:26:34 mhough: now we can do the ks and lab image :) 15:26:44 okay is that it for #198? 15:26:54 Yes 15:26:55 Affirmative 15:27:16 #info issues with the labs image https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/199 15:27:30 #info Change proposal draft is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Comp_Neuro_Lab 15:27:34 OK, I checked, and all the packages in the comps diff are in F30. 15:27:54 So the same PR should be applied for F32, F31, and F30. 15:27:54 .thank zbyszek 15:27:54 dan1mal thinks zbyszek is awesome and is happy they are helping! (Please also type zbyszek++ since that is what gives them a cookie) 15:28:03 ah, brilliant 15:28:09 zbyszek++ 15:28:09 dan1mal: Karma for zbyszek changed to 6 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:28:26 #action FranciscoD make same additions to f30 and f31 for comps PR 15:28:38 zbyszek++ 15:28:57 The change proposal was relatively simple. 15:29:01 It's for F32, of course 15:29:42 For the change proposal draft, I looked it over and it looks good. The only change i made was adding bt0dotninja to the list of owners. 15:30:05 dan1mal: Awesome. Oh, and could you add a bit to your userpage on the wiki when you have a sec? 15:30:30 Just a link to your webpage/blog etc maybe? 15:30:32 sure 15:30:37 bt0dotninja++ 15:30:41 bt0++ 15:30:47 #action dan1mal to edit webpage/userpage 15:30:57 :) 15:31:17 .thank bt0dotninja for his help! 15:31:19 dan1mal thinks bt0dotninja for his help! is awesome and is happy they are helping! (Please also type bt0dotninja for his help!++ since that is what gives them a cookie) 15:31:35 bt0dotninja++ 15:31:35 dan1mal: Karma for bt0dotninja changed to 8 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:31:38 So, if everyone can look over the change proposal, I'll submit it to the program manager on Monday. How does that sound? 15:31:39 ok are those the action items for this issue? 15:31:59 Sounds good. 15:32:18 just needs to be submitted, right? To infra? 15:32:36 #action FranciscoD submit change proposal on Monday, 16th Sept 15:32:49 great 15:32:54 dan1mal: well, it needs to be submitted to the program manager first, by changing the category of the wiki page 15:33:03 they'll look it over, file the necessary bugs 15:33:17 and then I reckon we'll make a PR against kickstarts 15:33:57 and see what else releng needs us to do 15:34:13 #info review and merge biosig PR 15:34:22 done, update pushed to bodhi 15:34:29 awesome 15:34:39 major++ 15:34:57 I also show this 15:35:06 #info update bug link on blog and docs with short link 15:35:11 also done 15:35:27 and finally 15:35:29 #info short bug link: https://tinyurl.com/neurofedora-bugs 15:35:32 #info comment on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739786 15:35:57 FranciscoD++ 15:35:58 mhough: Karma for ankursinha changed to 6 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:35:58 Ah, I forgot this one 15:36:12 well that was for all the others 15:36:21 Miro has said they'll make an announcement about the new macros, so we can proceed with that review now 15:36:53 I don't see it here but I would like to add 15:36:56 commented on the bug now 15:37:23 #info update of python3-fsleyes to fc30, fc31 15:38:07 mhough: there's a new version, but I want the update with sip/wxpython to go to stable first 15:38:26 since that fixes the crash bug 15:38:27 yes sip/wxpython made it to testing yesterday and I am pleased to say it works 15:38:47 mhough: please leave karma. I didn't want to since I'm the maintainer too :) 15:39:21 #info Please test python3-fsleyes, and if it works, please give this update +1 karma: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d10d453d2b 15:39:29 Gotcha 15:39:38 yay! .thank mhough 15:39:53 Do we want to file for F31 beta freeze exception? 15:39:56 I was checking that out yesterday and I will try 15:40:16 hmm, zodbot really? i have to type your commands without any pre-text? 15:40:19 the sip/wxpython update fixes another package for me too 15:40:19 .thank mhough 15:40:19 dan1mal thinks mhough is awesome and is happy they are helping! (Please also type mhough++ since that is what gives them a cookie) 15:40:51 zbyszek: hrm, I hadn't thought of that 15:41:22 Please zbyszek that sounds important 15:41:53 I don't see a sip update for f31 at all 15:41:55 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=sip 15:42:01 Ah, no, it's there 15:42:04 * FranciscoD is blind 15:42:19 :D 15:42:25 #info F31 fsleyes + sip + wxpython update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e58677d9dd 15:42:51 Great OK on to the next topic then 15:42:54 sudo dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2019-e58677d9dd '*' 15:43:19 zbyszek: since a proven packager editd that, and autopush is disabled, a proven packager will have to manually push these to stable too? 15:44:32 Not sure. I re-enabled autopush just in case. 15:44:35 #topic additonal pagure tickets 15:44:47 zbyszek: that should do it, thanks 15:45:29 #info #276 Package descriptions 15:45:40 That's a WIP, infra is looking into it 15:45:57 Always a good time to bring up 15:46:05 #info Infra ticket to update package summaries: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8159 15:46:13 #info #274 Flock conference reports 15:46:14 we can remove the next-meeting tag from this 15:46:19 er, from 276 15:46:22 not 274 :P 15:46:45 actually, can I close 276 now that infra has been informed? 15:46:54 nothing for us to do there 15:46:55 okay great 15:47:02 Sorry for joining in late. So, just an update that I had assigned myself #281. 15:47:22 MeWjOr: nice, we'll get to that in the Open Floor if that's OK? 15:47:30 Sure 15:47:33 thanks MeWjOr 15:47:45 pagure.issue.edit -- ankursinha edited the close_status and status fields of ticket neuro-sig/NeuroFedora#276 https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/276 15:47:46 pagure.issue.comment.added -- ankursinha commented on ticket neuro-sig/NeuroFedora#276: "Package descriptions at Fedora Package Sources" https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/276#comment-597211 15:48:08 okay anything you want to add on 15:48:13 #info #250 15:48:25 The flock reports are still pending (274) 15:48:36 Yes 15:48:42 * FranciscoD has to write a report for the OSB workshop too 15:48:49 #action FranciscoD write event report for OSB workshop 15:49:05 that sounds interesting 15:49:55 I'll give some info on that in Open Floor 15:51:44 mhough: next :) 15:51:53 okay are there any bug reports that we should cover? 15:52:27 I don't thik so. 15:52:30 No, nothing new there 15:52:31 #topic Neuroscience query of the week 15:53:04 I guess I can give an update on what I saw at the workshop here---it was all fairly technical 15:53:06 I don't know if anyone had a topic they wanted to discuss 15:53:19 Sure that would be relevant 15:53:31 #info http://www.opensourcebrain.org/docs/Help/Meetings#OSB_2019 -> was the agenda 15:54:09 Angus and Padraig are from UCL here in London. They are funded by the Wellcome trust and are in-charge of the "Open Source Brain" initiative 15:54:19 In general, OSB builds tools for visualisation and access of neurscience data 15:54:45 You can play around with it here: http://www.opensourcebrain.org/ 15:54:53 I see Padraig Gleeson behind a number of software initatives 15:55:10 You can also run simulations using OSB 15:55:22 mhough: yes, he's also part of INCF with Andrew Davidson etc 15:55:35 I see 15:55:44 This paper describes OSB quite well: https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(19)30444-1 15:55:57 Now, an important part of all this is standardisation 15:56:23 As in, coming up with a global standard of how to save neuroscience data so that it can be shared 15:56:30 and so that all tools can target the same standard 15:57:02 #info From the experimental side, "Neurodata without borders" is now quite widely accepted: https://neurodatawithoutborders.github.io/ 15:57:16 we have the python library for nwb in NeuroFedora already, by the way 15:57:46 I saw you submitted some new items this week, were they from OSB? 15:57:52 For model descriptions, OSB uses NeuroML: https://www.neuroml.org/ 15:58:02 mhough: not all of them---I added whatever tools the other speakers had mentioned 15:58:17 Yeah thats what I was trying to do from CNS too 15:58:24 Nice, more packaging work ;) 15:58:30 are there commercial versions of these softwares too? 15:58:30 oh, so much more XD 15:58:38 dan1mal: generally, no. 15:58:39 haha 15:58:44 they're mostly FOSS 15:59:27 Some experimental labs do use commercial, proprietary software---but that's extremely specialist software 15:59:30 Really interesting 15:59:38 like for use with electron microscopes and that sort of thing 15:59:58 Yeah especially labs that are doing microscopy work 16:00:13 seems to me in another decade or so the software may come together like redhat and get commercialized in some shape or form 16:00:14 NeuroML is basically a model description language. THe idea is that if you write in NeuroML, that can run on any simulator: neuron, nest, brian2, genesis, tvb 16:00:40 dan1mal: if we do a good job, who knows, RH may think of helping us with support ;) 16:00:47 * FranciscoD has thought of that for the long term 16:00:54 I was thinking that too 16:01:14 early days, though :) 16:01:27 So, NWB is a standard now 16:01:37 Here is someone who will be seaking at computational psychiatry 16:01:38 def. a field of possibilities now that ai is rising. i think it may come faster than expected. 16:01:39 https://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-gcecchi 16:01:57 NeuroML is too, but adoption is slow because people love to write their own things 16:02:11 It's nice to see that IBM has a neuroimaging group :) 16:02:29 dan1mal: yeh, but a majority of AI folks dont care about the brain or neuroscience 16:02:38 it's brain inspired at most 16:03:00 That is sort of true but Hinton and others actually do 16:03:14 mhough: yeh, the core group that tries to understand the maths does 16:03:28 it seems that the two sciences will meet in the not so distant future 16:03:30 not the folks that do applied AI, which is unfortunately the majority :( 16:03:44 yeah its true 16:03:51 dan1mal: hard to say---we thought AI would be conscious in 20 years back in 1980 XD 16:04:02 There is a great Montreal meeting MAIN that I woould recommend 16:04:09 mhough: link? 16:04:16 lol, yeah, i remember encyclopedia britannica had books showing us living in space by the 2000s 16:04:22 I probably won't make it. I expect my next event will be CNS next year 16:04:38 http://www.crm.umontreal.ca/2018/MAIN2018/index_e.php 16:04:40 INCF meet in Seattle next year---maybe I can make it there. Depends on timing, funds etc 16:04:44 that was last year 16:05:01 nice 16:05:03 haha living in space:) 16:05:10 There were people from the Allen Institute there 16:05:15 (at OSB) 16:05:26 Yeah OSB looks great 16:05:40 https://portal.brain-map.org/ -> massive database of neurons 16:05:45 Okay its been an hour 16:05:48 from genetic info to morphology etc 16:05:56 ugh, yeh, it has 16:06:04 I should go sorry - I need to get my daughter to preschool 16:06:13 I'll write a report about it all anyway 16:06:19 Awesome 16:06:27 #topic Next meeting day, and chair. 16:06:32 I added dnf commands for all our tools to docs, by the way: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/neurofedora/compneuro-tools 16:06:45 Ah, who shall chair the next meeting? 16:06:47 So I assume we will meet again next week 16:06:56 MeWjOr: want to give it a go if you're done with exams? 16:07:02 Yes who would like to chair? 16:07:03 I 16:07:03 * MeWjOr still has exams 16:07:14 * MeWjOr has an exam tomorrow... :( 16:07:15 ah, not you then MeWjOr 16:07:23 dan1mal: you OK to chair again? 16:07:26 i'll have a tougher time the coming weeks. Having a coding bootcamp 16:07:37 ah, yeh, I remember you saying so 16:07:46 Sorry, i can't - my class runs right into our meeting 16:07:48 better focus on that---most of the work for comps etc is done 16:08:04 zbyszek: @bt0dotninja? 16:08:05 still not sure of the format, but I will know next week 16:08:18 I'll be at a conference next week, I'll most likely miss the meeting. 16:08:20 I can always do it 16:08:36 ah, no worries 16:08:48 mhough: maybe I'll do it and we go around the same order? 16:08:52 cool 16:08:55 gives everyone a rest too? 16:09:00 #info FranciscoD chair next meeting 16:09:28 mhough: please close the meeting so you can get on with your day :P 16:09:35 #action mhough send out logs to mailing list 16:09:36 yeah 16:09:37 okay 16:09:44 thanks everyone 16:09:48 :D 16:10:01 thank you! 16:10:05 #endmeeting