15:59:58 #startmeeting "NeuroFedora - 2019-11-12" 15:59:58 Meeting started Tue Nov 12 15:59:58 2019 UTC. 15:59:58 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:59:58 The chair is bt0. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:59:58 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:59:58 The meeting name has been set to '"neurofedora_-_2019-11-12"' 16:00:15 #meetingname neurofedora 16:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'neurofedora' 16:00:30 #chair MeWjOr mhough FranciscoD alciregi blackfile bt0 zbyszek 16:00:30 Current chairs: FranciscoD MeWjOr alciregi blackfile bt0 mhough zbyszek 16:00:43 #topic Introductions and Roll call 16:01:03 #info Alberto Rodriguez (bt0dotninja), UTC-5 (America/Mexico-City), CommOps, Marketing, packaging, neurofedora, Fedora-Join 16:01:11 .fasinfo bt0dotninja 16:01:12 bt0: User: bt0dotninja, Name: Alberto Rodriguez Sanchez, email: hotgalan@gmail.com, Creation: 2016-07-25, IRC Nick: bt0, Timezone: America/Mexico_City, Locale: en, GPG key ID: E74B5808, Status: active 16:01:15 bt0: Approved Groups: neuro-sig fedorabugs packager +advocates @commops +summer-coding +ask-fedora mindshare +fedora-join @fedora-mx ambassadors dotnet-team marketing cla_done cla_fpca 16:02:03 #info Ankur Sinha (ankursinha), UTC (Europe/London), NeuroFedora, packaging, join and lots of other bits :D 16:02:06 .fasinfo ankursinha 16:02:07 FranciscoD: User: ankursinha, Name: Ankur Sinha, email: sanjay.ankur@gmail.com, Creation: 2008-05-28, IRC Nick: FranciscoD, Timezone: Europe/London, Locale: en_GB, GPG key ID: E629112D, Status: active 16:02:10 FranciscoD: Approved Groups: @wikiedit provenpackager +packager robotics-sig @ask-fedora scitech @neuro-sig @fedora-join cla_fedora cla_done fedorabugs @freemedia @gitfedora-tour cla_fpca @gitfpaste +qa 16:02:26 .fasinfo major 16:02:27 MeWjOr: User: major, Name: Aniket Pradhan, email: aniketpradhan1999@gmail.com, Creation: 2019-02-09, IRC Nick: MeWjOr, Timezone: Asia/Kolkata, Locale: en, GPG key ID: None, Status: active 16:02:30 MeWjOr: Approved Groups: qa neuro-sig fedorabugs packager wikiedit cla_done cla_fpca 16:04:15 .fasinfo gicmo 16:04:19 gicmo: User: gicmo, Name: Christian Kellner, email: ckellner@redhat.com, Creation: 2017-01-09, IRC Nick: gicmo, Timezone: UTC, Locale: en, GPG key ID: None, Status: active 16:04:22 gicmo: Approved Groups: +neuro-sig fedorabugs packager cla_done cla_fpca 16:05:49 cool 16:07:26 #topic Today's agenda 16:09:06 #info Tasks from last week's meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2019-11-05/neurofedora.2019-11-05-16.03.html 16:09:06 #info Pagure tickets: https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issues?status=Open&tags=S%3A+Next+meeting 16:09:07 #info Open NeuroFedora bugs: https://tinyurl.com/neurofedora-bugs 16:09:07 #info Neuroscience query of the week 16:09:07 #info Next meeting day, and chair. 16:09:09 #info Open floor 16:09:32 Do you have another point for the agenda 16:09:47 * FranciscoD doesn't 16:11:18 ok 16:11:58 #topic Tasks from last week's meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2019-11-05/neurofedora.2019-11-05-16.03.html 16:12:47 we have this one: 16:12:53 #info FranciscoD tweak abstract draft for FOSDEM -> MeWjOr is taking a look 16:13:11 some comments? 16:13:36 I changed some statements.. but it just looks like I paraphrased it a bit... :P 16:13:47 that's fine 16:13:56 MeWjOr: can you send it to the ML so everyone can look? 16:14:08 yeah, sure 16:14:39 awesome, you're the FOSDEM event owner, so its your responsibility to get everything (including your visa!) done on time :P 16:14:48 so feel free to chase people around etc 16:14:57 :D 16:15:01 Also, I am doing all the edits on a repo on my account... I wasn't sure if I should create a new repo directly on the neurofedora github page 16:15:05 right 16:15:25 MeWjOr: doesn't matter--anywhere will do 16:15:45 great... I was thinking we can import it later onto the neuro-fedora account later on as well. 16:15:50 sounds great, we need to write down anther action? 16:16:02 *another 16:16:23 make some updations to the presentation slides, and then ? 16:16:52 MeWjOr: whenver you prefer really---just share the link so that everyone can have a look and give comments 16:16:55 bt0: yes please 16:17:20 sure... 16:18:41 Should I share a PDF on the ML? For the abstract? 16:18:59 Or a view-only or comment-only link to Overleaf? 16:19:00 #action major / MeWj0r will update the FOSDEM proposal tt he mailing list 16:19:42 what do you think? 16:19:43 MeWjOr: PDF will do---should be short enough and I doubt there'll be too many comments 16:20:00 PDF it is then... 16:20:26 Will send it in a few moments then.. 16:21:57 great 16:22:03 bt0: next item :D 16:22:08 ok 16:22:44 #topic Pagure tickets: https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issues?status=Open&tags=S%3A+Next+meeting 16:25:01 #topic #311 Move neuroscience planets to NeuroFedora 16:25:10 let me read it quick 16:25:48 bt0: this is WIP, not complete yet (and quite low priority), so we can skip it and move to the next one 16:26:03 ok, the next one 16:26:20 #topic #307 NeuroFedora at FOSDEM 2020. 16:26:57 I loved "self-plagiarism is still plagiarism" 16:27:23 haha 16:27:23 :( 16:27:28 This is in a working state by major 16:27:34 yep 16:27:55 ok, the next ticket or do you have comments? 16:28:17 not right now... :/ 16:30:23 ok 16:30:58 #topic Ticket #301 NeuroFedora brochure 16:31:10 Also a WIP 16:32:15 ok 16:32:23 the last one is: 16:32:50 #topic Ticket #250 Figure out badges rule to award badge automatically to pagure group members 16:33:04 ON HOLD 16:33:15 sorry for the capital case... 16:33:23 :P 16:33:36 XD 16:37:11 still waiting on badges 16:37:21 but not much we can do---we'll ping again later, it's relatively low priority 16:37:42 umm 16:38:10 #topic Open NeuroFedora bugs: https://tinyurl.com/neurofedora-bugs 16:39:34 wow, exist some for newbies?? 16:39:39 like me 16:39:58 there are some update bugs... 16:40:15 let's see who gets them first... you or me... :P 16:40:16 bt0: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768267 should be quite straightforward 16:40:30 MeWjOr: do you want to do the fsl ones again? 16:40:39 upstream seems to be releasing quite quickly XD 16:40:51 Yep.. I can do that 16:40:57 cool 16:41:24 bt0: please assign that one to yourself and give it a go :) 16:41:36 if you're unsure, you can always fork and submit a PR 16:41:43 of course 16:41:43 FranciscoD where are the reviews you were talking about? 16:41:54 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771068 -> should also be straightforward 16:42:27 MeWjOr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770582 one maybe? but it's java 16:42:31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770582 : this is one 16:43:10 yeh, that one 16:43:20 should be simple enough, but it's a java package 16:43:27 I'm not too fond of java either :/ 16:43:52 #action bt0 work on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768267 -> update python-fastavro 16:44:03 :) 16:44:06 Java is like discount C++ ... :P 16:44:09 #action MeWjOr work on python-fsl* updates 16:44:22 MeWjOr: it uses maven to build etc, I had to read up quite a bit of docs to see how it works 16:44:33 I love c++ and have bad feeling about Java 16:44:47 yep... used maven before... I can peek a look there as well 16:45:12 haha, yeh, I don't mind programming in it, but I've never had to use the the ant/maven etc build systems too much 16:45:37 MeWjOr: how is the editdistance review going? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769297 16:46:38 I made the required changes, as per Elliot... Mainly, I had to delete the cpp file that was being generated from Cython and had to regenerate that in the spec file 16:46:51 Ah, OK 16:46:56 Waiting for an update, now 16:47:08 setup.py calls Cython etc generally---doesn't do it here? 16:47:55 It builds the main cpp extension instead of the required cpp files there... so have to explicitly use cythonize in the spec file 16:48:22 to build the required cpp, then setup.py builds the main cpp extension from there 16:48:58 yeh, they've commented out the cythonise bits: https://github.com/aflc/editdistance/blob/master/setup.py#L24 16:49:03 that's fine, not a problem 16:49:16 yep... that had me confused for a whole day, lol 16:49:31 the things upstreams do XD 16:49:48 XD 16:50:18 bt0: I think that's all the bugs, next topic? :D 16:50:38 ok 16:50:47 #topic Neuroscience query of the week 16:52:07 does Telekinesis come under NeuroScience? 16:52:08 We started this ticket: https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/318 16:52:20 #info https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/318 : our reading/listening list 16:53:13 MeWjOr: no, there's no evidence of telekinesis as far as I know, so at the moment it isn't science---it's science fiction 16:53:18 or "psuedoscience" 16:53:30 pseudoscience, rather 16:53:57 if anything, it'd be a physics problem first---since it violates the laws of physics 16:54:16 *if* it can be reliably observed, maybe neuroscience would see how it is done 16:54:31 but yeh, science-fiction at the minute :) 16:54:31 using brain waves to control objects, would be rather cool... 16:54:50 Yeh, loadsa science fiction based around it 16:55:00 right 16:55:02 but cool != real, unfortunately :( 16:55:07 but don't we actually use the brain signals to control the body, and then the objects? 16:55:17 :( 16:55:26 MeWjOr: that's not the same thing ;) 16:55:40 you can use your brain to control your arm and move objects 16:55:57 bt0: exactly...! 16:56:05 telekenisis is about doing it without using your arm 16:56:11 but, it's not telekinesis... 16:56:16 i mean touching the object 16:56:39 MeWjOr: also, the brain signals don't make the arm move---they tell the muscles what to do 16:56:39 still is amazing who it happens 16:56:43 the muscles move the arm 16:56:52 so it isn't really "the brain moving the arm" 16:56:58 *how 16:57:06 if the arm didn't have muscle, no amount of brain signals would move it 16:57:18 important to be very specific about what does what 16:58:15 it true 16:58:23 it's true 16:58:39 I find the "eye" (cilliary) muscles really awesome though... Like, they perform so much work as compared to any other muscle in the body 16:59:00 yeh, saccades are rather important 16:59:11 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccade 16:59:35 Ahh! 16:59:44 are the cilliary muscles the ones on the outside or the ones attached to the lens in the eye? 16:59:47 * FranciscoD doesn't remember 16:59:58 attached to the lens 17:00:34 also very important 17:00:46 as if I had to say that XD 17:01:06 Try this post when you have time: https://www.quantamagazine.org/noise-in-the-brains-vision-areas-encodes-body-movements-20191107 17:01:07 :) 17:01:24 Is there even like a useless muscle in the human body? Almost all of them serve some purpose 17:01:36 other than the appendix... I hate it 17:01:54 it brings up the interesting idea that what we traditionally think of as "noise" in the brain isn't actually "noise"---it's encoding lots of other things that are all important 17:02:00 MeWjOr: the appendix isn't a muscle, is it? 17:02:26 muscular structure? 17:02:33 I think the out ears have muscles that we've evolved to not use now---but some folks can move their ears a bit 17:02:40 MeWjOr: there's a specific definition for muscle too 17:02:53 fleshy != muscle 17:03:03 in the sense of what we think of as "fleshy" 17:03:28 ohh 17:03:36 the appendix is a tube: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appendix_(anatomy) 17:05:40 I love the anatomy images 17:05:59 I guess that's a lot of anatomy images for me, then... 17:06:35 the drawn ones 17:06:56 Let's close the meeting, we can talk about all this after 17:07:03 (no point of it being logged) 17:07:06 #topic Next meeting day, and chair. 17:07:09 lol.. 17:07:19 I may not be able to make the next one, so I won't volunteer 17:07:29 me again 17:07:31 * MeWjOr has exams from the next week.... 17:07:31 I may be visiting a lab, and I don't know when I'll be free 17:07:45 this time is fine for me 17:07:50 should we cancel next week's meeting if 2/3 of us cannot make it? 17:08:12 it's fine 17:08:32 I am not sure, if I will hanging around next week... 17:08:53 we can decide next week, I guess... 17:09:06 Sure 17:09:14 maybe take a headcount, and then decide on the spot 17:09:14 sure 17:09:21 #info May not have a meeting next week: will check later 17:09:24 there we go 17:09:28 ++ 17:09:36 #topic Open floor 17:09:40 pagure.issue.tag.added -- ankursinha tagged ticket neuro-sig/NeuroFedora#318: S: Next meeting https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/318 17:09:50 nothing on the open floor from me 17:09:54 any comments 17:10:00 nopes... 17:10:10 end meeting in 3 17:10:12 2 17:10:13 1 17:10:16 0 17:10:19 #endmeeting