<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:00:41
!startmeeting Quality
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
15:00:42
Meeting started at 2024-03-18 15:00:41 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
15:00:42
The Meeting name is 'Quality'
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:00:46
!topic Roll Call
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:00:54
ahoyhoy folks, who's around for a quality meeting?
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:01:03
.hi
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:01:13
.hello
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:01:23
Or not
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
15:01:41
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:01:43
Neil Hanlon (neil) - he / him / his
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:01:57
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:01:58
Brandon Nielsen (nielsenb)
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:02:02
I see now
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
15:04:31
how's everyone doing today
<@tflink:fedora.im>
15:05:01
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:05:02
Tim Flink (tflink)
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:05:33
morning morning everyone
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:06:29
let's get rolling...
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:06:33
!topic Previous meeting follow-up
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:06:50
!info no action items from last meeting
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:07:37
!topic Fedora 40 status (including Beta testing plans)
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:07:45
so...this is getting a bit complicated again...
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:08:14
!info Beta-1.7 is, so far, looking like a viable candidate, much better than anything we had last week
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:08:25
but i'm tracking quite a lot of stuff:
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:08:45
!info dustymabe had worrying results with the new shim in CoreOS testing - https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1694
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:09:56
!info there are some significant known differences in the contents of at least one image now built by kiwi but formerly built by imagefactory - the container base image built with kiwi is missing gzip and sudo - and we haven't yet checked the others out fully (thanks Jeremy Linton for checking container base)
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:10:22
!info it seems sdubby may be getting installed instead of grubby in far too many cases - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269992
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:11:15
!info there's an update for GNOME 46 final builds of the core components (gnome-shell etc.) that we *may* want to pull in as an FE
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:11:42
!info travier wants to revert bootupd again - https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/pull-request/498
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:12:10
am I forgetting something? i think i'm forgetting something. there's Kamil Páral 's proposed blocker, too
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:12:17
so, it's looking like a fun morning...
<@kparal:matrix.org>
15:12:37
huh, which one?
<@kparal:matrix.org>
15:12:56
was I moonworking again?
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:13:12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270030 - oh, that's lruzicka , i thought it was you for some reason
<@kparal:matrix.org>
15:13:28
s/moonwork/sleepwork/
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:13:37
i like 'moonwork'
<@kparal:matrix.org>
15:13:58
I'll use czenglish more often, then 🙂
<@tflink:fedora.im>
15:14:38
Does that imply that you make progress in the opposite direction that it looks like, similar to moonwalking?
<@geraldosimiao:matrix.org>
15:15:06
!hi
<@kparal:matrix.org>
15:15:07
no, I just confuse the terms 😄
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:15:08
Geraldo S. Simião Kutz (geraldosimiao) - he / him / his
<@geraldosimiao:matrix.org>
15:15:27
was testing basic graphics mode now, didnt realize the hour
<@geraldosimiao:matrix.org>
15:15:34
sorry
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
15:15:44
that's probably not untrue for working past when one should go to sleep, w.r.t. making negative progress
<@kparal:matrix.org>
15:15:53
geraldosimiao: it works fine, if you select the right option 🙂 I just tested
<@geraldosimiao:matrix.org>
15:16:15
I select all options on basic graphics mode on bios
<@geraldosimiao:matrix.org>
15:16:20
none works here
<@kparal:matrix.org>
15:16:48
let's move this to #quality:fedoraproject.org and debug there
<@geraldosimiao:matrix.org>
15:16:50
I tried nomodeset too
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:18:12
oh, yes, that's what i'm missing
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:18:56
!info there is also a report of basic graphics mode not working - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270128
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:19:13
if other folks can try that out on their hardware, with all the combinations (UEFI and BIOS, KDE and GNOME) that'd be super helpful. i will do it on my test box after the meeting
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:21:03
any other notes on f40?
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:23:33
How are we feeling about our ARMs?
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:24:04
the pi 400 blocker is still outstanding, unfortunately
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:24:09
that's another thing that should be on the list
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:24:31
!info the pi 400 blocker is still outstanding - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267968 . We did the candidate compose on the theory folks may want to waive it, but we should still try and get it fixed
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:25:56
did anyone test other ARMs yet? especially with the minimal disk image?
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:26:02
note to self: try it on jetson
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:26:23
My Pi 4b booted minimal successfully
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:26:32
But I haven't really had any time to run it through it's paces
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
15:29:03
i've not tried it on mine yet, but will test a handful of arm sbcs this afternoon.
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:33:34
Basic graphics mode boots with Workstation 1.7 on my ancient BIOS laptop
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:34:46
thanks for that testing brandon!
<@kparal:matrix.org>
15:34:57
I believe geraldosimiao just considered the first item to be a title, when it is actually a selectable item
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:35:22
I'll try with KDE here in a minute
<@geraldosimiao:matrix.org>
15:36:11
yeah, that was my error
<@geraldosimiao:matrix.org>
15:36:22
yeah, that was my fault
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:37:39
So we don't actually have basic graphics concerns?
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:37:54
Other than the usual existential dread
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:38:09
seems like it. but it's always a good thing to test
<@kparal:matrix.org>
15:38:09
Correct
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:38:28
Okie
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:39:38
alright, moving on, then
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:39:49
!topic Test Day / community event status
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:39:54
Sumantro Mukherjee: are you around?
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:41:04
well, he was around an hour ago...:D
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:41:21
!info Fedora IoT test week is this week: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-03-18_Fedora_40_IoT_Edition#Prerequisites_for_Test_Day and https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/178
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:42:43
!info Podman Desktop test day with be 2024-03-20: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-03-20_Podman_Desktop
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:42:56
!info Podman 5 test day will be 2024-03-21: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-03-21_Podman_5
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:43:13
!info Toolbx test day will be 2024-03-27: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-03-27_Toolbx
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:43:14
welcome to containers week, I guess :D
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:43:32
anything else to note on this topic?
<@geraldosimiao:matrix.org>
15:45:09
not from me
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
15:45:42
nope
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:47:18
alllrighty
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:47:20
!topic Open floor
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:47:28
any other business? a reminder that blocker review meeting is at the top of the hour
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:47:39
if you have blockers/FEs to propose, get them in before then, it helps
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:50:23
otherwise, we can wrap up
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:52:05
okay, thanks for coming, everyone!
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:52:18
go forth and continue to test F40...I *suspect* we'll wind up with a new compose one way or another, hopefully later today
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:53:46
!endmeeting