<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:00:41
!startmeeting Quality
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
15:00:42
Meeting started at 2024-04-15 15:00:41 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
15:00:42
The Meeting name is 'Quality'
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:00:45
!topic Roll Call
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:00:59
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:01:01
Brandon Nielsen (nielsenb)
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:01:53
Big crowd
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:02:05
:P
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:02:13
it's the quality not the quantity
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:03:30
aw, sorry to hear Kamil Páral
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
15:05:42
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:05:44
Neil Hanlon (neil) - he / him / his
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
15:06:06
feel better Kamil Páral
<@tflink:fedora.im>
15:07:18
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:07:19
Tim Flink (tflink)
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:07:49
hi hi
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:08:45
welp, let's do a quick run through then
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:08:49
!topic Previous meeting follow up
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:09:30
!info no action items from previous meeting
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:09:42
!topic Fedora 40 status
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:10:16
!info RC-1.14 is the current test candidate, please help fill out the matrices - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_40_RC_1.14_Summary
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:10:45
!info it would also be good to have more folks test the proposed blocker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275099 and see if they hit it (I just tried, and didn't)
<@tablepc:matrix.org>
15:10:51
!HI
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:11:09
hi tablepc
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:11:16
any other notes on f40?
<@tablepc:matrix.org>
15:11:41
Testing now no problems yet.
<@tablepc:matrix.org>
15:12:01
14 that is.
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:12:54
nice
<@amoloney:fedora.im>
15:13:50
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
15:13:52
Aoife Moloney (amoloney)
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:15:28
It works for me too, unless I'm missing something
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:16:15
that's good to hear
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:16:22
if folks could add their experience to the bug that'd be useful
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:18:14
alrighty, then
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:18:25
!topic Test Day / community event status
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:18:29
Sumantro Mukherjee: are you around?
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
15:20:07
i will give it a try today for that bug on my test systems
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:21:34
thanks neil
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:21:40
okay, let me take a look at the community events, then...
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:22:25
!info Upgrade Test Day was on April 8 - https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/185 . looks like we had a good turnout, thanks to all testers
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:22:50
!info OpenCL test day was April 9 - https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/186 . smaller turnout there, but thanks to the folks who came!
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:23:17
!info there are no more events upcoming right now, we're focusing on the Fedora 40 release
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:23:18
any other notes?
<@tablepc:matrix.org>
15:25:00
Screencast works fine in1.14
<@tablepc:matrix.org>
15:25:26
Already noted in bug
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:25:36
thanks
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:25:44
seems like some kinda race issue for sure...
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:27:41
!topic Open floor
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:27:57
any other notes, folks? otherwise we can all take a break before blocker review in half an hour :)
<@amoloney:fedora.im>
15:28:08
I have one topic
<@amoloney:fedora.im>
15:28:25
I opened a ticket in the QA repo, let me find it. It's just an fyi though
<@tablepc:matrix.org>
15:28:30
So fare I haven't seen any issues with F40 Workstaation
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:29:02
I just have a question, with some momentum behind "2FA by default" effort, does the kernel test day results submission work with 2FA?
<@amoloney:fedora.im>
15:29:21
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/773
<@yattatux:fedora.im>
15:31:32
hello, for the upcoming intel opencl tests I asked for a tutorial...
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:31:33
Brandon Nielsen: on a quick look, it basically delegates auth to the main webui, so I *think* it should.
<@yattatux:fedora.im>
15:31:48
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/772
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:31:54
Is that what it does if I don't populate any auth stuff in the config file?
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:32:47
Brandon Nielsen: it looks to me like it just goes to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/kerneltest/login for auth , which lets the id.fedoraproject.org login flow handle it
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:33:01
maybe it can store some kind of token or something once you've authed once, i don't know
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:33:35
Yattatux: oh, yes, i remember that comment. sorry, I was too busy with f40 stuff to look at it further, I'll ask sumantro to consider it for future runs of the event, though
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:33:53
Conceptually that sounds great to me, but success will obviously depend on volunteer manpower
<@nielsenb:fedora.im>
15:34:18
Thanks, I'll give it a whirl next time
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:34:42
Aoife Moloney: yeah, again i didn't have time to follow up yet with f40 stuff, but on the whole i agree with brandon
<@tablepc:matrix.org>
15:34:58
I always read the proposals I'll be happy to help where I can
<@amoloney:fedora.im>
15:35:42
Np, wanted to just throw it in here for awareness for now and we can take more time to discuss after f40 ☺️
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:36:41
alrighty, anything else, folks?
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:37:00
!action adamw or kparal to follow up on https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/773 after discussing it with the team
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:37:09
(that's mainly just there so we are reminded about this next meeting, if we forgot :>)
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:38:19
see you in 22 minutes over in #blocker-review:fedoraproject.org , folks
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:38:22
thanks for coming
<@adamwill:fedora.im>
15:38:26
!endmeeting