15:05:50 #startmeeting RDO meeting (2015-10-21) 15:05:50 Meeting started Wed Oct 21 15:05:50 2015 UTC. The chair is trown. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:05:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:05:58 o/ 15:06:01 o/ 15:06:08 o/ 15:06:15 #halp ? 15:06:18 I'm actually in a meeting at the mother ship today, so I'm here, but not very attentive. 15:06:24 #chair number80 apevec jpena rbowen 15:06:24 Current chairs: apevec jpena number80 rbowen trown 15:06:36 rbowen, np, you'll get all AIs :) 15:06:44 yep. :-) 15:06:55 hehe 15:07:06 o/ 15:07:13 #chair dtantsur 15:07:13 Current chairs: apevec dtantsur jpena number80 rbowen trown 15:07:45 ok lets get started 15:07:51 #topic AI reports 15:07:52 * social o/ 15:08:01 #chair social 15:08:01 Current chairs: apevec dtantsur jpena number80 rbowen social trown 15:08:08 trown, ah that's actually not a topic 15:08:13 it should be just FYI in agenda 15:08:35 but looks like only recorded AI last time was that you's chairing today 15:08:37 oh ok, so folks with AI from last meeting should update the etherpad? 15:08:54 yeah, so we don't loose time on it 15:09:06 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Packaging 15:09:07 ack 15:09:16 I'll get that written 15:09:26 #topic Any RDO Liberty GA blockers? 15:09:37 did you update inspector? 15:09:38 #action apevec explain "AI reports" in agenda 15:09:44 dtantsur, yes 15:09:48 dtantsur: yep inspector is updated 15:09:49 awesome, thanks 15:09:56 ready in -release I just wanted someone to verify the build 15:10:30 apevec: ya there are a couple folks verifying https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273680#c11 and I asked to make sure they have the updated inspector as well 15:10:34 #link http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=7094 openstack-ironic-inspector-2.2.2-1.el7 15:10:38 dtantsur, ^ 15:10:56 o/ (sorry late) 15:11:00 trown, lemme check if it was mirrored to buildlogs 15:11:15 which is the first item here. I think https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273680 was a side effect of RDO_RELEASE not working properly and should not be a blocker 15:11:18 I applied EmilienM aodh group permissions fix on aodh 15:11:24 #chair dmsimard 15:11:24 Current chairs: apevec dmsimard dtantsur jpena number80 rbowen social trown 15:11:47 https://github.com/openstack-packages/aodh/commit/b25f8dc1fb480fa51281a48b1e0d3704b85399b2 15:12:00 http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=7093 15:12:13 number80, how can we verify if that's all for aodh ? 15:12:36 apevec, number80: there's smoke running *right now* for both rdo manager and packstack on a repo with the aodh fixes in 15:12:52 apevec: unless there's another issue, aodh perms are fixed now 15:12:55 dmsimard, but does smoke cover aodh? 15:12:56 However, there are no smoke tests for aodh (EmilienM actually tried to put some upstream but got rejected) 15:13:14 afaik aodh is not event installed by either packstack or mgr ? 15:13:17 apevec: EmilienM came across the aodh issues when packaging a puppet module for aodh and doing it's acceptance tests 15:13:29 apevec: correct, afaik 15:13:42 that's why it's not a blocker for GA 15:13:51 what is aodh? 15:13:52 it's nice to have 15:13:56 so real test is to ask EmilienM to try it but he needs passed-ci first... 15:13:58 number80, ack 15:14:03 trown: alarm code splitted from ceilometer 15:14:04 trown, part of ceilo 15:14:05 trown: aodh is a spinoff off of ceilometer to manage alamring 15:14:07 ah ok 15:14:19 hello 15:14:21 trown: installed the latest liberty RPM and the repo points here : http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7Server/cloud/x86_64/openstack-liberty/repodata/repomd.xml 15:14:21 o/ 15:14:24 ceilometer, gnocchi and aodh now 15:14:25 fun 15:14:31 a true blocker is trove configuration 15:14:35 whcih provides a 404 15:14:35 rook, yep 15:14:38 *file broken 15:14:45 apevec: expected? 15:14:47 rook, 404 / 15:14:49 ? 15:14:52 number80: what trove config ? 15:15:08 apevec welll "Not Found" 15:15:13 dmsimard: it was reported here, the config files we ship are broken 15:15:18 rook, oh crap is that RHEL ? 15:15:27 7Server 15:15:29 apevec: yes... trown warned me 15:15:30 trown: I continuously run into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271289 15:15:39 trown: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271289#c6 works for me as w/a 15:15:41 rook: I did warn you :P 15:15:44 haha 15:15:44 I would have pushed it earlier but I have to sync branches of the package first 15:15:46 rook, yeah only centos7 is tested, but I'll fix that 15:15:50 didn't even get out of the damn gate. 15:16:00 rook, please file me issue in 15:16:00 apevec: roger yeah, I want to try rhel -- hope rhel71 suffices. 15:16:04 trown: how come I get 2 mac addresses after the introspection 15:16:12 https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdo-release 15:16:14 dtantsur: ^ 15:16:19 rook, ^ 15:16:25 https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdo-release/issues 15:16:37 sasha21, vm/baremetal? 15:16:42 dtantsur: bm 15:16:55 #action apevec fix rdo-release-liberty.rpm for rhel 15:17:01 sasha21, could you paste your /etc/ironic-inspector/inspector.conf? 15:17:12 We need to have a better front end to "where does this ticket go" on the RDO site. 15:17:21 rook, yeah, 7.1 should work, it will just need few non-default repos enabled 15:17:49 rbowen: +1, where to file bugs would be helpful - or at least have some default bin somewhere where we can have knowledgeable members triage 15:17:54 dtantsur: http://fpaste.org/281959/44544064/ 15:18:09 dtantsur: so I always remove the second mac from nodes and re-attempt deployment 15:18:14 ok we are a bit off topic... what is the AI for trove blocker 15:18:15 dtantsur, trown - in the meantime inspector 2.2.2 landed in http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-liberty/?C=M;O=D 15:18:43 apevec roger . https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdo-release/issues/2 15:19:26 I do some test with RDO Liberty and get this error: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/281961/14454407/ I'm not sure if Khaleesi should adjust the $PATH of If we should patch instack-undercloud (that's what I did https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238069/ ). 15:19:31 trown, number80, oh we don't have trove GA build yet? 15:19:46 now I see we have openstack-trove-4.0.0-0.1.0rc2.el7 in testing 15:20:02 apevec: nope 15:20:03 I'll untag it, it is not installed by either packstack or mgr, is it? 15:20:18 Goneri: I can help you with that after the meeting 15:20:24 it'll be done tonight 15:20:27 o/ 15:20:36 number80, ok then it will be pushed after GA 15:20:39 sasha21, looks good, now `sudo journalctl -u openstack-ironic-inspector` please 15:20:40 Goneri: it is a khaleesi issue 15:20:48 apevec: ack 15:21:03 #chair chandankumar 15:21:03 Current chairs: apevec chandankumar dmsimard dtantsur jpena number80 rbowen social trown 15:21:05 if no blockers are reported NOW, I'd like to be as close as possible to traditional noon EST deadline 15:21:06 trown, thanks, i close the review. Sorry if I come in a middle of a meeting. 15:22:10 apevec: manager does not install trove 15:22:30 apevec ill hold off for now - do we think the repo will be alive later today/this week 15:22:32 ok, trove rc2 is untagged and won't be pushed for GA 15:22:44 rook, GA will be today 15:23:00 apevec so the RHEL7 repos will be live too ? 15:23:01 rook, but content is the same as current testing 15:23:04 right 15:23:08 it's the same repo 15:23:12 ah ok 15:23:13 I just need fixe release rpm 15:23:17 rgr 15:23:30 silly RHELisms 15:23:45 is there anything needed for: announcement text based on https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AnnouncingReleases 15:23:54 dtantsur: http://fpaste.org/281963/44544099/ 15:24:15 I mean, $releasever = 7Server - what were they thinking?? 15:24:36 trown, yes. Needs to be written :) 15:24:40 lol 15:24:51 is that AI on rbowen? 15:24:53 rbowen, ^ can you take that or tied up w/ allday meetings? 15:25:11 yeah, but looks like he might not be able to do it 15:25:11 sasha21, this looks incomplete, is it really the full log? anyway, let's move it to #tripleo to not interfere with the meeting 15:25:21 Sending out the announce? Yes, I can do that. 15:25:30 rbowen, no, writing it :) 15:25:42 dtantsur: meeting? 15:25:47 Oh, writing it. I'd like to pass that on. I'm needing to be very focused here. 15:26:09 rbowen, ok I'll put up a draft and send around for quick reviews 15:26:10 sasha21, the RDO meeting that is going on around us right now right here :) 15:26:22 apevec++ 15:26:24 rbowen, just advice re "branding" 15:26:40 in the light of recent release rpm discussion 15:27:00 #action apevec to draft release announcement and post back for quick reviews 15:27:01 rbowen, Can we have one announcement which works for both cloud sig and RDO ? 15:27:30 I'll try my best, but notorious as brand-ignorant :) 15:27:46 Yes, I think so, if it doesn't further contribute to the confusion that we already have about CentOS/RDO/Delorean and what each one is. 15:28:03 Apparently we need to do a better job of communicating what each of those is. 15:28:30 folks put too much into names, it's all just tools for the job 15:29:02 anyway, I'll try my best, feedback will be welcome 15:29:14 Sure. But if we don't tell people which tool is for which job, they'll start hammering the screws. :-) 15:29:35 ah ah 15:29:49 rbowen, that's sometimes needed actually, but got it :) 15:30:07 ok are we good on RDO Liberty GA topic? 15:30:07 :) 15:30:11 I'll few words w/ definitions 15:30:17 s/few/add few/ 15:30:37 trown, yes, just to confirm: no new known blockers ? 15:31:04 and I can ping KB after this meeting to start sync to mirros ? 15:31:23 warning: silence means YES 15:32:04 then... 15:32:05 apevec: not that I have seen, there is still verification in progress for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273680 15:32:19 but I am convinced that is the RDO_RELEASE issue 15:32:24 #action apevec ping KB after the meeting to start sync to mirros 15:32:42 trown, yep afaict that was it 15:32:50 ok moving on 15:32:57 #topic Package Reviews 15:32:58 trown, one thing re docs 15:33:11 trown, is it updated to use rdo-release-liberty.rpm everywhere now? 15:33:37 apevec: no I need to do that after the meeting, only instructions for manager are delorean based 15:34:08 #action trown update rdo manager docs for rdo-release-liberty.rpm 15:34:27 back to topic, package reviews 15:34:48 we had few contributed last week, but not reviewers yet... 15:35:07 is someone interested ? 15:35:19 for grabs are murano mistral and ec2 api 15:35:33 these are fedora reviews? 15:35:37 nope 15:35:40 RDO 15:35:42 ok 15:35:48 mistral is available 15:35:51 but clients are for fedora 15:36:42 I do not think I can take anything else on until after Summit, but if they are still untaken then, I would not mind 15:37:26 links to review BZs were posted in [Rdo-list] Review of Murano, Mistral, python-muranoclient, python-mistralclient 15:37:56 ok, I'll also start grabbing some tomorrow after GA is cleared 15:38:15 but please anyone start doing package reviews it's fun! 15:38:16 :) 15:38:22 trown: smoke is green for me 15:38:27 +2 15:38:31 even if you're not Fedora packager yet 15:38:39 moreover, if you're unsure, just do an informal one 15:38:40 informal reviews are counted 15:38:47 when trying to join packagers 15:38:50 it helps reducing the lead time 15:38:53 yep 15:39:39 where is starting point for reviewer? 15:39:44 number80, maybe we could create separate repos for informal reviewing in gerrit? 15:40:04 jschlueter, fedora guidelines, RDO inherits them 15:40:15 we just can do (unwritten yet) exceptions 15:40:20 I'm interested in being informal reviewer when I have spare cycles 15:40:31 number80 has initial draft in trello 15:40:51 jschlueter, one comment in https://trello.com/c/7WaR9j3X/81-bugzilla-component-for-packages-reviews 15:41:10 NB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=RDO&format=fedora-review does NOT work yet 15:41:33 but you can use template with product=Fedora then change it 15:41:53 ok moving on? 15:42:03 this all should be in updates to rdo-packaging (coming soon after GA!) 15:42:05 trown, yes 15:42:08 #topic Delorean server rebuild (after Summit) 15:42:34 jpena: ^ 15:43:03 This is just a heads up: we are planning to rebuild the Delorean instance to get some bigger specs, use mock to build and update the user-data 15:43:05 this will be switch to mock and larger flavour? 15:43:10 ok 15:43:26 this will happen the week after summit, I'll send an announcement on rdo-list when the plan is finished 15:43:30 jpena, see in agenda, I'd like one fix cherry picked into production before that 15:43:44 apevec: no problem, I'll do that after the meeting 15:43:51 opm has bad NEVR now 15:43:54 ok, thanks! 15:44:09 #action jpena to cherry pick http://rdoproject.org/repos/openstack-liberty/rdo-release-liberty.rpm into production delorean 15:44:14 #undo 15:44:14 Removing item from minutes: ACTION by jpena at 15:44:09 : jpena to cherry pick http://rdoproject.org/repos/openstack-liberty/rdo-release-liberty.rpm into production delorean 15:44:29 wrong paste? :) 15:44:43 #action jpena to cherry pick https://github.com/openstack-packages/delorean/commit/dbd4271b23cf50d0f68768af5d33905be55aec38 into production delorean 15:44:48 :o) 15:45:13 be careful with that paste, could've been password 15:45:36 we're done with the agenda! 15:45:47 #topic open floor 15:47:10 Don't forget the RDO community lunch in Tokyo 15:47:19 You're all invited 15:47:35 dmsimard: when is that 15:47:46 http://openstacksummitoctober2015tokyo.sched.org/event/3f4fc45fd4e9ee0a0a02749f97a67499 15:47:52 #link http://openstacksummitoctober2015tokyo.sched.org/event/3f4fc45fd4e9ee0a0a02749f97a67499 15:47:59 awesome thanks 15:48:39 ok seems like we can close out the meeting 15:48:40 yeah, what time is 1500 UTC in Tokyo next week? 15:48:48 oh... right 15:49:00 i.e. who will be around for the meeting next week except me :) 15:49:03 #topic chair for next meeting? 15:49:09 I'll take it 15:49:13 lol 15:49:16 apevec: looks like around midnight 15:49:20 https://www.google.ca/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=7LMnVuz9MoSJMcasiqAB&gws_rd=ssl#safe=off&q=3pm+utc+in+tokyo 15:49:21 to meet me myself and I 15:49:34 #action apevec to chair next meeting 15:49:36 I ... probably won't attend the next meeting :p 15:49:44 dmsimard, you'll be all drinking sake at that time 15:49:55 or shoshu 15:49:58 apevec: the tricky part is if nobody is here you will have no one to take the meeting after next :p 15:50:10 crap :) 15:50:24 lmao 15:50:34 thanks everyone for attending! 15:50:37 #endmeeting