15:00:19 <jednorozec> #startmeeting RELENG (2021-06-15)
15:00:19 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Jun 15 15:00:19 2021 UTC.
15:00:19 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
15:00:19 <zodbot> The chair is jednorozec. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:19 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:19 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'releng_(2021-06-15)'
15:00:20 <jednorozec> #meetingname releng
15:00:20 <jednorozec> #chair nirik sharkcz pbrobinson pingou mboddu dustymabe ksinny jednorozec
15:00:20 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'releng'
15:00:20 <zodbot> Current chairs: dustymabe jednorozec ksinny mboddu nirik pbrobinson pingou sharkcz
15:00:20 <jednorozec> #topic init process
15:00:30 <nirik> morning
15:00:39 <sharkcz> hi all
15:00:47 <mboddu> Hello
15:00:59 <jednorozec> hello everyone
15:02:57 <jednorozec> soo there is a new issue with meeting tag
15:03:03 <jednorozec> .releng 10162
15:03:05 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #10162: Are repos in the container namespace also branched from rawhide? - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10162
15:04:07 <mboddu> So, should we branch or shouldn't we?
15:04:26 <nirik> I thought we didn't... but I am not sure why we decided that.
15:04:51 <nirik> we could ask for input on devel / ask fesco to weigh in?
15:05:31 <jednorozec> we should, I think there are number of ways one can use the container git repo. Not everyone will want to get branched
15:06:00 <mboddu> +1 to nirik's plan
15:06:32 <mboddu> Lets start with devel list and if we see more people wanting it, then we can file a FESCo ticket for approval
15:06:56 <nirik> cool. You want me to post it? or one of you wants to?
15:07:53 <jednorozec> I can do that
15:10:59 <jednorozec> so what is next
15:11:35 <nirik> thanks.
15:11:55 <nirik> next for the meeting? ;)
15:12:09 <jednorozec> so I have one question for mboddu
15:12:16 * nirik had something he was going to bring up, but now... I can't remember it. ;(
15:12:33 <mboddu> jednorozec: Shoot
15:12:33 <jednorozec> what key is used to sign butane?
15:12:36 <jednorozec> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10163
15:13:00 <mboddu> jednorozec: Right, the script has the key listed in it, all we need to do is run it on bodhi-backend01, that is all
15:13:16 <mboddu> And upload it to your humaton.fedorapeople.org and give them the link
15:13:35 <jednorozec> mboddu, ahh I was confused that KEYTOSIGNWITH='fedora-34' was just a placeholder
15:13:57 <mboddu> jednorozec: Nope, that is being used during the invocation of the script
15:14:20 <jednorozec> mboddu, ok thanks.
15:14:37 <mboddu> I generally create a temp dir and work in that temp dir and upload that dir to mohanboddu.fedorapeople.org
15:16:11 <jednorozec> .releng 10134
15:16:12 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #10134: Shorten side-tag merge window by tagging builds after being singed all of them - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10134
15:16:34 <jednorozec> so this just means to update docs to enable signing as with other tags?
15:17:10 <nirik> yeah, for any 'larger' tag
15:17:30 <jednorozec> meaning? 500+ packages?
15:18:15 <nirik> not sure where the cut off should be. I guess really we could just say any releng added side tag? since we don't get many now?
15:18:32 <jednorozec> +1
15:19:51 <jednorozec> I will update the doc
15:19:55 <mboddu> +1 to any releng created side tags
15:20:28 <mboddu> jednorozec: Its in the doc, we stopped following it since not many side tags were getting requested. Now, we just have to follow the SOP
15:22:01 * nirik cleans out monitor-gating side-tags while we are thinking about sidetags.
15:22:17 <jednorozec> mboddu, ack
15:22:41 <nirik> we should really fix that. either in bodhi or in monitor gating. ;(
15:23:21 <nirik> 110 side tags deleted.
15:23:40 <jednorozec> nirik, so problem is that we dont cleanup any gating side-tags?
15:23:54 <jednorozec> or worse case we cleanup some of them?
15:24:18 <nirik> jednorozec: I'm not sure if it's 100% of them, or just some of them, but some just don't get cleaned up... there's a script to do so.
15:25:14 <nirik> looks like it might not be untagging right
15:25:14 <jednorozec> nirik, in releng repo? I can have a look at it this week
15:26:07 <nirik> no, it's a openshift app... monitor-gating (its the thing that makes random builds and makes updates and makes sure ci tests them, a end to end test)
15:26:18 <nirik> look for example at: f35-build-side-42237
15:26:36 <nirik> it looks like it's never untagging the builds from the side-tag... but perhaps bodhi should be doing that?
15:27:19 <nirik> ok, yeah, it's not happy.
15:27:20 <jednorozec> nirik, i will look into it.
15:27:26 <nirik> (and no one is watching it I guess?)
15:27:55 <jednorozec> there is a dashboard for gating
15:27:57 <jednorozec> https://monitor-dashboard-web-monitor-dashboard.app.os.fedoraproject.org/d/6q2qpcvGz/monitor-gating?orgId=1
15:28:37 <nirik> huh
15:28:56 <nirik> might be failing in a way that doesn't show failure.
15:28:59 <nirik> 14:17:21 - Update None created : https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/None
15:28:59 <nirik> [DONE]
15:29:06 <nirik> None?
15:29:10 <jednorozec> huh
15:29:21 <nirik> 14:17:21 - Update for dummy-test-package-crested-0-3739 not created within 15 minutes
15:29:21 <nirik> [FAILED]
15:29:41 <jednorozec> ok I will ask adam tomorrow about that
15:30:02 <jednorozec> And we will fix it
15:30:21 <nirik> ok, awesome. thanks.
15:31:10 <mboddu> I hope its not one of those `None` issues in bodhi db that happened last year or so
15:31:44 <nirik> I think if so there would have been others affected.
15:33:50 <nirik> mboddu: how's your mini-iniative? :)
15:34:05 <mboddu> nirik: Nope, not started on it yet :(
15:34:38 <mboddu> Last Fri we tackled some mass rebuild stuff in CS and couldn't find time to work on this :(
15:34:47 * mboddu feels bad now
15:36:27 <nirik> no worries.
15:37:49 <jednorozec> The good thing about work is that it does not run away ;)
15:40:58 <jednorozec> .releng 9240
15:40:59 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #9240: Update published Fedora 31 cloud images - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9240
15:41:16 <jednorozec> so can we close it now, that there are tracking tickets in the cloud sig?
15:42:07 <Southern_Gentlem> f31 sould be dead
15:42:28 <Southern_Gentlem> or are they meaning update to f34
15:42:36 <nirik> this has just been around that long. ;)
15:43:09 <mboddu> Haha :)
15:43:10 <nirik> I guess closing and saying 'let us know when you want us to do anything' would work...
15:43:21 <mboddu> And yes, we can close it... ^
15:45:53 <jednorozec> so what can we do about this
15:45:56 <jednorozec> .releng 8579
15:46:00 <zodbot> jednorozec: Issue #8579: Clean out accidentally committed tarballs in rpms/tlog - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8579
15:46:40 <nirik> so, there was some clever thing I think churchyard did for another repo with this...
15:46:54 <nirik> basically moving the commit to a archive ref so it's still there, but never gets pulled.
15:47:07 <jednorozec> oh, I remember he posted something in one of the issues
15:47:23 <jednorozec> blender or something
15:48:00 <nirik> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7265
15:49:10 <jednorozec> thanks
15:49:19 <nirik> so, I guess do the same there?
15:49:26 <nirik> and write a sop? :)
15:49:27 <jednorozec> yup
15:50:25 * jednorozec writes sop for everything, not always up-to-date though
15:50:48 <jednorozec> #topic Open Floor
15:50:51 <mboddu> Thanks jednorozec
15:51:21 <jednorozec> I will start working on the issues we discussed tomorrow.
15:52:19 <nirik> cool.
15:53:10 <jednorozec> If there is nothing more, I would end this meeting.
15:53:24 <nirik> still can't think of what I was gonna bring up, but lets end... I can always go next week. ;)
15:53:35 <jednorozec> There is a LOT of hay that needs to be turned here.
15:54:20 <jednorozec> nirik, write it down or highlight me on standup I will read it back
15:54:32 <jednorozec> #endmeeting