16:00:14 #startmeeting RELENG (2021-12-14) 16:00:14 Meeting started Tue Dec 14 16:00:14 2021 UTC. 16:00:14 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:14 The chair is jednorozec. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 16:00:14 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:14 The meeting name has been set to 'releng_(2021-12-14)' 16:00:14 #meetingname releng 16:00:14 The meeting name has been set to 'releng' 16:00:14 #chair nirik sharkcz pbrobinson pingou mboddu dustymabe ksinny jednorozec 16:00:14 #topic init process 16:00:14 Current chairs: dustymabe jednorozec ksinny mboddu nirik pbrobinson pingou sharkcz 16:04:45 * mboddu is in a meeting, but should be available in 10 min 16:07:00 I don't have much updates from the last week. 16:07:11 Let me check the tracker 16:10:09 oh 16:10:11 this is new 16:10:14 .releng 10465 16:10:14 jednorozec: Issue #10465: Unable to build a new flatpak - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10465 16:13:46 That is something we should ping David or Vipul, its in OSBS 16:14:05 I am lookinginto the logs and it is really strange 16:14:17 I will ping them both on the ticket 16:14:54 hello :) 16:17:22 ok what do we have next here 16:18:46 .releng 10461 16:18:47 jednorozec: Issue #10461: Tagging packages for update - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10461 16:18:51 I will close this one 16:18:56 it should be fixed 16:20:45 .releng 10456 16:20:46 jednorozec: Issue #10456: Bootstrap of rust packages in EPEL9 - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10456 16:21:45 jednorozec: In the previous ticket, how did you fix the partio builds? 16:23:10 mboddu, tagged them with f*-u-testing tags and created the bodhi update 16:23:19 oh 16:23:25 candidate it was. 16:23:30 they are in testing now 16:24:02 Yeah, you just need to tag them into candidate tag, that should be enough 16:24:47 Also, they were not cleaned up by mistake, the maintainer hasn't submitted the update for the build after building it. Hence it got cleaned up 16:25:31 I thought I wrote that in the ticket 16:26:09 and I did not 16:26:13 let me add it there 16:26:26 np, just wanted to let you know :) 16:26:42 I know why it was in the trash 16:28:36 updated the comment 16:28:38 anyway 16:28:42 And re: bootstrap of rust packages, its not a great idea to tag them into epel9 tag as epel9-next builds will have .el9.next dist tag 16:28:54 right 16:29:12 But I presume he want to tag them and rebuild app bumped for epel9 16:29:20 *all 16:29:51 Hmm, he needs the epel9 branches in the dist-git anyway for it 16:30:21 yes. But it should help a lot to use existing builds to do the rebuild 16:30:29 atleast that is my understanding 16:31:07 And to keep the epel9 tag clean, maybe he can create a epel9 side tag, we can tag the builds into that side tag, let him bump/rebuild them and merge it back into epel9 16:31:20 hmmm 16:31:24 that is cleaner 16:32:03 I would suggest it rather than tagging them into epel9 next 16:32:16 I would suggest it rather than tagging them into epel9* tag 16:32:29 * jednorozec is writing the comment 16:32:50 * mboddu waits... 16:35:35 done 16:36:01 I will also tag it 16:37:18 Ok I dont have anything more 16:37:26 * mboddu is nothing as well 16:37:42 I cant type today :) 16:38:22 you are not alone 16:39:17 I will give in another 2 mins and close the meeting if nobody has anything 16:42:34 #endmeeting