16:00:05 #startmeeting RELENG (2022-01-18) 16:00:05 Meeting started Tue Jan 18 16:00:05 2022 UTC. 16:00:05 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:05 The chair is jednorozec. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 16:00:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:05 The meeting name has been set to 'releng_(2022-01-18)' 16:00:05 #meetingname releng 16:00:05 #chair nirik sharkcz pbrobinson pingou pmoura mboddu dustymabe ksinny jednorozec 16:00:05 #topic init process 16:00:05 The meeting name has been set to 'releng' 16:00:05 Current chairs: dustymabe jednorozec ksinny mboddu nirik pbrobinson pingou pmoura sharkcz 16:00:47 morning 16:00:53 hello 16:01:22 morning nirik pmoura 16:01:46 .hi 16:01:47 dustymabe: dustymabe 'Dusty Mabe' 16:03:01 so, tomorrow is the mass rebuild 16:03:04 .releng 10538 16:03:05 jednorozec: Issue #10538: Fedora 36 Mass Rebuild - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10538 16:03:13 oh, I thought it was today. 16:03:44 https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html 16:03:45 but I guess not. cool. 16:03:48 says tomorrow 16:04:10 so, builders should be ready, hopefully armv7 ones will be stabler this time. 16:04:13 pmoura, do you want to stick around to see what and how it is done to rebuild fedora? 16:04:26 I did get more disk for s390x, and if I have time today I will make more builders. 16:04:31 jednorozec sure 16:04:45 but need to figure out it's multipath and weird setup 16:05:48 pmoura, is 15:00 UTC to early for you? 16:06:37 nirik, so this somehow slipped my list, https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10515 16:06:38 jednorozec No its fine 16:06:53 pmoura, I will create meeting and send invite 16:07:05 ok, thanks 16:07:09 yeah, I know gcc12 is in now... not sure about the rest 16:07:14 so 16:07:47 Do I understand the request correctly that they requested toolchain rebuild before the mass rebuild? 16:10:36 not clear... 16:10:52 I thought they just meant doing a mass rebuild _for_ the toolchain changes 16:11:08 well that was my first understanding 16:11:33 I guess ask in ticket? 16:11:46 but yesterday i got through the list of changes and read it again... 16:11:50 Yeah 16:12:09 worst case scenario we will run another rebuild. 16:12:30 I hope not. ;) 16:13:44 also there is a comment from vondruch about ruby 16:13:49 on the tracker issue 16:14:15 looking at the rebuild script I can simply sort it in a way that ruby will be build first https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/mass-rebuild.py#_97 16:14:50 well, or he can rebuild ruby right before, we can wait for it to land, then run? 16:15:32 note that mass rebuild does not update the build root... 16:16:00 well he said 2-10 days 16:16:07 let me see if he's around... 16:17:29 it's unclear to me if he just needs ruby rebuilt, then everything depending on it, or if there's more going on. 16:18:50 from yesterday jednorozec: that would be nice, that would save some rebuild, although it would certainly need more than one roud due to dependency loop 16:19:29 hum, ok. In the past we have always tried to get these things done before mass rebuild, but oh well. 16:20:36 I guess ask in ticket? he doesn't seem to be on irc right now. 16:21:35 Hi there 16:21:40 howdy vondruch 16:21:42 hey. 16:22:02 so whats our best bet with ruby here? :) 16:22:31 you could rebuild it in rawhide and then it will get used by the mass rebuild... but that doesn't help if there's more loops, etc... 16:23:27 There is 100+ packages 16:23:32 which would get broken 16:23:44 So we would prefer to use side tag 16:23:47 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UFA2YI5EG4W5NUJBEXNR6CJFUTYQO4RZ/ 16:23:48 we could just wait until after mass rebuild and do it in a side tag... yeah 16:24:10 These ^^ are the last ruby-sig thoughts 16:24:25 nirik: and yes, that is essentially the same proposal 16:24:43 If the Fedora mass rebuild has a chance to be done in a week 16:24:55 I sure hope so. ;) 16:24:56 then it would be the preferred option 16:25:29 unless something goes on horrible fire it should be done in a week 16:25:39 But I guess it will be better if we wait for the Fedora then to block Fedora, so to say ;) 16:26:09 we could also do a named side tag and have releng merge it... but I guess bodhi can handle 100ish builds now 16:26:22 so the mass rebuild goes on tmrw 16:27:16 thanks vondruch 16:27:39 YAW, thx for considering the Ruby rebuild 16:27:55 thanks for bringing it up. 16:28:03 👍️ 16:28:33 vondruch: worst-case scenario we'll not make it in time, and simply build for both F36 and F37, right? If we focus on one F37 f.e., I can mirror all builds by some automation (I have most of the required scripts ready) 16:29:33 so 16:29:36 moving on 16:29:38 .releng 10540 16:29:39 jednorozec: Issue #10540: Build of GPRbuild is stuck on four arches. - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10540 16:29:58 hmm this might impact mass rebuild 16:29:59 I think this can be closed now... it's a gcc bug 16:30:28 ah 16:30:43 except the bug link seems invalid 16:30:53 there is 3D 16:31:01 at the beginning of bugid 16:31:25 ha 16:31:28 I have eddited the comment 16:31:54 so, yeah, we should get a ack from gcc folks that they are ready... 16:32:05 hopefully this won't affect too much or they will have a fix. 16:33:39 so link into the mass rebuild tracker issue and ping some one? 16:34:39 well, I guess ping on the tracker and cc @jakub and ask if it's go before the mass rebuild. I think there's an internal rh channel where they hang out too.. 16:36:11 it's just nice to get an ack that things are ready and there's no show stoppers before we start the mass rebuild 16:36:41 right 16:37:48 next one 16:37:51 .releng 10544 16:37:52 jednorozec: Issue #10544: F36 Self Contained Change: Authselect: Move State Files to /etc - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10544 16:37:59 that is no-releng chnge 16:38:04 +1 16:41:20 .releng 10513 16:41:21 jednorozec: Issue #10513: Disk images have significantly increased in size with Fedora 35 - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10513 16:41:36 still folks investigating. 16:42:37 yeah there is an update 16:46:47 not sure what to think... needs someone finding the exact layer I guess. 16:48:06 moving on 16:48:10 .releng 10543 16:48:11 jednorozec: Issue #10543: Request to add packager rights to a service account - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10543 16:48:21 do we give packager permissions to bots? 16:48:39 we can, but... they can do PRs with https... 16:48:46 right 16:48:50 if thats all they need. I can add to the ticket 16:49:02 please do so 16:49:49 done 16:50:30 we have last 10 minutes for open floor 16:50:31 #topic Open Floor 16:50:54 * nirik has another meeting in 10min, has to get coffee. ;) 16:50:59 nothing from me off hand. 16:52:36 nirik: I just opened the PR for the SOP builders 16:54:15 I have same questions to keep doing it 16:56:27 ah ha, cool. I can take a look if/when I ever get out of meetings. ;) 16:56:34 thanks for working on it 16:57:11 ok thanks 17:01:20 #endmeeting