16:00:20 #startmeeting RELENG (2023-01-24) 16:00:20 Meeting started Tue Jan 24 16:00:20 2023 UTC. 16:00:20 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:20 The chair is jednorozec. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 16:00:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'releng_(2023-01-24)' 16:00:20 #meetingname releng 16:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'releng' 16:00:21 #chair nirik sharkcz pbrobinson phsmoura dustymabe jednorozec 16:00:21 #topic init process 16:00:21 Current chairs: dustymabe jednorozec nirik pbrobinson phsmoura sharkcz 16:02:16 morning 16:05:01 #topic mass rebuild 16:05:11 so there is some mess after the rebuild :/ 16:06:11 always happens 16:06:16 yeah. 16:06:20 :3 16:06:42 as per the schedule 16:06:43 https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-releng-tasks.html 16:06:51 we should build fedora-repos 16:06:56 * jednorozec did not 16:07:37 I need to make a f39 key I guess. 16:07:43 or f40 16:07:50 40 16:07:57 39 is there 16:08:34 I forget, is there a mass rebuild of modules after the main mass rebuild? 16:08:54 I knew something is off 16:09:01 Let me run it right now 16:11:06 I'll make f40 key later today and we can update fedora-repos tomorrow... 16:12:00 ack 16:13:01 so I have just one more thing 16:13:07 other than massrebuild 16:13:09 .releng 11233 16:13:10 jednorozec: Issue #11233: Automation of request-repos in flatpaks namespace - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11233 16:13:39 it that something we want to do? autoack all flatpaks comming from flatpak-sig? 16:13:57 not sure. 16:14:10 i am in said sig so I can't say :) 16:14:10 I haven't had time to really ponder on it. 16:14:17 if yes implementation will be simple and maybe goot entry point into todlers for jnsamyak 16:14:55 one issue I see is that 'sigs' don't have formal members... 16:15:35 but aside that I guess it would be ok... 16:19:05 I mean, we could make a fas group, but we would need to make sure whoever managed it was clear that it provided this access. 16:20:05 oh ok sigs dont have fas groups 16:20:40 they can... 16:20:45 meanwhile we can implement that part if requester == package maintainer and namespace flatpaks 16:20:50 just differing rules as to who to add. 16:21:02 for example, qa just adds anyone who requests it. ;) 16:21:07 I see 16:21:38 I'm not against, we just need to make sure people aren't getting added that shouldn't be. 16:23:09 so we can maintain the group 16:23:38 but i think we can safely do the part when packageowner is requesting flatpak 16:23:53 and add more conditions 16:23:58 like group or whatever 16:25:18 sure, it should be easy to add things after the initial handling is there. 16:28:33 you want to update the ticket? or would you like me to? 16:31:07 nirik, can you o that please 16:31:16 I am triyng to get the modules rebuild running 16:32:33 sure. 16:32:51 Do we have anything more to discuss today? or should we end early and get back to work. ;) 16:33:04 oh, if I make the f40 key today and get it to you, can you do the fedora-repos updates? 16:33:54 I have nothing 16:34:25 nirik, sure just ping me when ready and I will do the update 16:34:50 * jednorozec is going to run the mass rebuild of modules 16:35:02 sounds great... 16:35:07 if we have nothing more to talk about I will close in few minutes 16:35:41 i have nothing 16:36:36 next week perhaps we should do a ticket triage/closing... ;) 16:36:41 but I have nothing more today 16:38:26 #endmeeting