15:00:20 #startmeeting RELENG (2023-04-25) 15:00:20 Meeting started Tue Apr 25 15:00:20 2023 UTC. 15:00:20 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:00:20 The chair is jednorozec. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 15:00:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'releng_(2023-04-25)' 15:00:20 #meetingname releng 15:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'releng' 15:00:20 #chair nirik sharkcz pbrobinson phsmoura dustymabe jednorozec 15:00:20 Current chairs: dustymabe jednorozec nirik pbrobinson phsmoura sharkcz 15:00:20 #topic init process 15:01:27 hi folks 0/ 15:01:28 morning 15:01:33 morning 15:01:40 afternoon 15:02:08 hello everyone 15:03:12 I have just few things for today 15:03:28 sooo 15:03:35 .releng 11399 15:03:36 jednorozec: Issue #11399: Add container/fedora-toolbox as a Fedora Linux 39 release-blocking deliverable - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11399 15:03:53 what do we need to do to make the artifact release blocking? 15:04:42 oh there are some comments I have missed 15:04:46 * jednorozec reads 15:05:28 well, if we don't build it as part of a compose... there's nothing we can do really. 15:06:21 we could definitely help at branching, but... that has nothing to do with it being release blocking I don't think. 15:06:29 yeah 15:06:38 I am reading the comment from rishi 15:06:57 It could be that we can make pungi make it... ie, it just gets made as part of compose. 15:06:58 so they just need to run containerbuild after the branching 15:07:05 but that will need some investigation 15:07:19 well, and at rc's... 15:07:57 yeah I am not in favor running thing manually 15:08:24 we are working on getting thing automated so adding new manual tasks seems weird... 15:08:32 *things 15:09:11 yeah. 15:09:23 so, perhaps we should look at what it would take to do them as part of pungi runs... 15:09:44 * jednorozec writes comment and assign it to me 15:10:30 it might be weird if we do that and then maintainers also manually make it... but probibly won't be too much of a problem 15:12:33 ok moving on 15:12:39 .releng 11388 15:12:40 jednorozec: Issue #11388: Files not removed when retiring due to blocking of git repo before the final push - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11388 15:12:47 close upstream? 15:13:55 we needed to fix the broken repo/package first I think? 15:14:20 ust delete the rest and dead.package it? 15:14:55 well, they didnt actually retired it 15:14:57 ah it seems to be 15:15:09 yeah you can --skip-checks 15:15:14 and it will do the right thing 15:16:11 ok, can you do that, or you want me to? 15:16:16 then we should close it after that. ;) 15:16:22 done 15:16:26 and closed 15:17:03 .releng 11156 15:17:04 jednorozec: Issue #11156: rubygem-kgio in weird zombie state - releng - Pagure.io - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11156 15:17:07 so this is weird 15:17:21 there is a few packages in this weird state 15:17:37 where they get branched but are supposed to be retired 15:18:16 and the branch staid there without any attention because original maintainer thinks its retired 15:18:26 yeah, we need to detect them and fix them 15:18:50 yeah, it has a dead.package... but... not the rest 15:20:43 I dont understand why do they get branched in first place 15:20:57 the script ignores retired packages 15:22:17 well, it's not blocked... or orphaned... how does it tell it's retired? 15:23:30 the thing is it was retired, it had orphan as maintainer 15:23:52 but suddenly there is package owner changed for rubygem-boxgrinder-build in module-package-list by bodhi 15:23:52 owner.name: orphan -> releng 15:23:56 huh, doesn't seem to now... https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo/ 15:24:02 or similar owner change that I cannot explain 15:24:56 nirik: I think this is the one: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-kgio/blob/rawhide/f/dead.package 15:25:33 wait, are we talking about 2 different tickets here? 15:25:47 right 15:25:48 h yeah, I am looking at the wrong one. ;) 15:25:48 :) 15:25:49 we are 15:25:49 it changed 15:26:28 so, bodhi is doing that somehow 15:26:49 Wed Apr 19 10:30:34 2023 package owner changed for rubygem-boxgrinder-build in module-package-list by bodhi 15:26:49 owner.name: orphan -> releng 15:26:49 Thu Apr 20 10:32:06 2023 package owner changed for rubygem-boxgrinder-build in module-package-list by bodhi 15:26:49 owner.name: releng -> orphan 15:27:29 yeah and on some packages it just added releng 15:28:35 was that branching day? 15:28:41 no. hum 15:29:46 nope 15:30:15 I checked the original reported package and some of the changes are at randnom dates 15:30:28 so... it has to be the koji sync listener. somehow 15:30:28 some are relevant to branching or mass rebuild 15:32:56 ah ha 15:33:07 it is koji sync listener 15:33:20 what part of it? 15:33:43 https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6663 is referred to in a comment 15:34:06 basically it's syncing rawhide/rpms package list with module-package-list for mbs 15:34:22 but it must somehow not be seeing some things as retired when they are. 15:34:39 at least we have a suspect 15:34:44 roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/owner-sync-pagure.j2 is the script 15:34:52 yeah, I think it's this, but I am not sure why... 15:35:22 my guess off by one in some cycle 15:35:37 could well be. needs more investigation. 15:35:45 anyhow we can update the ticket 15:35:47 and I'm low on coffee right now. ;) 15:36:06 go get some :) 15:36:17 or actually I dont have anything else 15:36:22 so 15:36:29 also don't have anything else 15:36:32 #topic open floor 15:36:41 * luna_ does not have anything else today 15:36:41 I'm not sure I had anything this week... lets see... oh, one thing 15:37:42 So, I am doing a prod->staging koji sync right now... it's taking a long time, but I wanted it working so I could test some things in staging. Then, likely later this week I will roll out to prod probibly. And soon we need to upgrade builders to f38, but if we just upgrade that should not be too hard. 15:38:38 thats all I had. 15:38:47 sounds good 15:38:52 I can do some of the updates in EU mornings 15:39:08 there seems to be less trafic at CET mornings 15:39:46 sure, we can coordinate. It can be next week or something, not urgent 15:41:44 ok 15:41:59 thank for coming. 15:42:02 #endmeeting