<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:01:41
!startmeeting RELENG (2024-02-27)
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
17:01:43
Meeting started at 2024-02-27 17:01:41 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
17:01:43
The Meeting name is 'RELENG (2024-02-27)'
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:01:48
!meetingname releng
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:01:53
!chair nirik sharkcz pbrobinson phsmoura dustymabe jednorozec jnsamyak patrikp
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:01:59
!info Meeting is 60 minutes MAX. At the end of 60, it stop
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:02:04
!info agenda is at https://hackmd.io/vm6biLBcTYKtkQUH5kQkmw
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:02:13
!topic init process
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:02:17
!hello jnsamyak
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:02:19
Samyak Jain (jnsamyak) - he / him / his
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:02:34
Hello folks, welcoming to the releng weekly! How is everyone doing today?
<@patrikp:matrix.org>
17:03:04
👋
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:03:16
morning
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:03:44
hola folks, ok for the init process i have some quick infos to share!
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:03:45
!info Fedora 40 Bodhi enablement and Beta freeze is in action
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:04:52
!info Beta Freeze (starts at 1400 UTC) Tue 2024-02-27 till Tue 2024-03-12 14 days
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:05:35
that's all, anything else that anyone wants to bring up? if not, we can jump to next interesting section where we discuss the piled tickets :)
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:06:37
!topic Tickets needing attention
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:06:44
!info this is the time where you can bring releng tickets to discuss if there are blockers etc
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:06:54
nirik: do you wanna start?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:07:02
sure, lets see...
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:07:09
hehe
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:07:25
There's several tickets around packages not getting blocked in rawhide/f41...
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:07:36
I took a quick look and couldn't see why things were not working.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:08:12
!releng 11981
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:08:13
**releng #11981** (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11981):**Retire kpipewire5 on f40 and rawhide**
● **Opened:** a day ago by churchyard
● **Last Updated:** a day ago
● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:08:22
!releng 11980
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:08:23
**releng #11980** (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11980):**Retirements stuck at f40**
● **Opened:** a day ago by churchyard
● **Last Updated:** 3 hours ago
● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:08:35
!releng 11979
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:08:36
**releng #11979** (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11979):**Some questions about man-pages-ko in koji**
● **Opened:** a day ago by pwu
● **Last Updated:** 9 hours ago
● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:08:38
yep +1 that I need to dicuss as well - I checked the scripts concering that but didn't find anything unusual, also before processing them manually i wanted to confirm the procedure
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:09:20
Yeah, I didn't look in pdc yet... but the process is basically:
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:09:27
I checked the blocker_retired script that i guess should be of concern, doesn't seem to find any issue there :/
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:09:45
so
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:09:48
the retirements
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:09:53
I mentioned koji steps here: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11981#comment-897919
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:09:57
I think we need to add new release somewhere
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:10:03
jednorozec: 👋
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:10:07
someone commits a dead.package file, there's a listener on bodhi-backend01 that sees it, it is supposed to set pdc to an EOL date of that date, then when rawhide and branched run they run releng/scripts/block_retired.py
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:10:23
I couldn't see anywhere missing the new release. ;(
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:11:06
actually sorry...
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:11:21
I misremembered... there isn't anything on bodhi-backend01 here... it's a toddler
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:11:29
yup
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:11:37
and I think that toddler have something in ansible
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:11:40
I looked at it's logs and it saw the commit and said it was setting it. it didn't have any error...
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:13:48
the only toddler thingy we did at the time pof branching was this: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/c/c9049a56db99f5eebbfebd88f4589b4853d66d3d?branch=main
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:14:41
yeah that might be the right place
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:14:48
40 is missing in some places
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:15:01
but nothing relevant to retirement
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:15:08
like this https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/blob/c9049a56db99f5eebbfebd88f4589b4853d66d3d/f/roles/openshift-apps/toddlers/templates/fedora-messaging.toml#_190
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:16:47
yes, that needs fixing, but isn't this particular problem.
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:17:00
nope its not but its something like this
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:17:09
we missed some place somewhere
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:17:32
what weird that I remember writing it down into the new docs last year
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:18:15
yeah i checked the issues from 6 months back there were some but cou;ldn't find anything useful out of it
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:19:00
hmm link?
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:20:13
pagure is awfully slow for me last couple of days or it's my system i dont understand
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:21:36
There should be some place that says what branches allow retiring...
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:21:47
yup
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:21:47
but not sure if thats this problem because it didn't work for rawhide either?
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:21:55
there is one in releng repo that was updated
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:22:05
perhaps the pdc token is messed up for toddlers and pdc isn't returning any error?
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:22:13
hum
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:24:16
there is a stack trace
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:24:22
not sure if relevant
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:25:07
I'm looking back into logs for kpipewire5...
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:27:09
I don't see that one in logs... but it was like 1.5 months ago...
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:27:11
so the script that actually block stuff has correct fedora versions in it
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:27:36
block_retired.py?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:27:42
So, how about we manually block all the ones with tickets then try and keep an eye out for if it's still happening?
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:27:49
yes
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:27:52
(instead of using our entire meeting on it; )
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:28:08
oh, we need to update pdc too if it's not.
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:28:24
I think its better to fix it and it will pick up all the packages that needs to get blocked
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:28:29
I can take that and fix it
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:28:38
no need to spend more time on it here
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:28:50
I can do that, but I just need to confirm two things
for koji we can do koji block-pkg <> <>
while for pdc we can make use of ahust eols or what?
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:28:52
I will sync my findings with jnsamyak tmrw
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:29:02
oh you beat me to it sure thing
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:29:13
hack tomorrow :D
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:29:21
well, we should only need to adjust pdc for the date it was retired and then the block_retired script should block it
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:29:37
!releng 11982
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:29:38
**releng #11982** (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11982):**Please create Fedora 40 Flatpak release in Bodhi**
● **Opened:** 23 hours ago by mattia
● **Last Updated:** an hour ago
● **Assignee:** jnsamyak
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:29:57
I think I found out why the comand wasn't working
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:30:33
I tried listing the f40-flatpak* tags but i couldn't find any which should have een created using make-koji-release-tag script
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:31:18
the question is to investigate, or can I create those tags manually now and not re-run the script to fix it?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:31:19
yeah, they are not there.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:32:18
I'd say cut that part of the script out (the part to do with *flatpak* tags) and run that manually to see where it might be erroring?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:32:32
you could also test in staging...
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:32:59
staging seems to be a good testing place for it will do thanks for heads up
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:33:05
I guess that script will just fail on anything thats already created... right?
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:33:22
yes
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:34:09
yeah, sounds like there's some problem in the script thats preventing it from making the top tag and then the rest just fail... but I would expect it to output some errors.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:34:20
Anyhow, yeah, try on staging
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:34:36
yep
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:34:56
!releng 11968
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:34:57
**releng #11968** (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11968):**Get some error message when push the private branch to the fork google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts repo**
● **Opened:** a week ago by pwu
● **Last Updated:** 6 days ago
● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:36:27
not looked at this one. No idea here... not sure if it's a issue with pagure or got or what...
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:36:49
i think, this issue should be opened at pagure
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:37:06
repo doesn't seem to be a releng problem?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:37:32
well, perhaps. Dunno if it's pagure or something we deploy like the fedora-messaging plugin.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:37:43
perhaps we could get Aurélien B to take a quick glance...
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:38:22
maybe, I'll check with aurelien tomorrow
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:39:01
sorry I hijacked your time for ticket, but this is the last one that i want to bring up and then stage is all yours nirik
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:39:08
!releng 11965
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:39:09
**releng #11965** (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11965):**Collect Atomic Desktop artifacts under single directory**
● **Opened:** a week ago by alebastr
● **Last Updated:** a day ago
● **Assignee:** jnsamyak
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:40:08
this one
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:40:10
so I guess this needs pungi changes... if we want it to happen for beta we will need to get a freeze break for deploying/adjusting that.
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:40:16
are we really doing this for f40?
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:40:52
some changes are already submitted but this will have consequences
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:41:13
as Adam outlined in his comment
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:41:19
I don't know... the accepted change is all supposed to be 'marketing'
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:41:27
exactly
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:41:31
so, I'd be happier doing this for f41.
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:41:36
I just re checked and there was just rename
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:41:40
for the freeze back thing, this needs to be approved by fesco (which both of you are anyways :P) but for my knowledge i'm asking because i'm not sure if we can break and fix things before the beta release happens
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:42:07
we can, we just should be very careful about it.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:42:20
in any case we should change rawhide first and work out any issues.
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:42:35
exactly
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:43:01
so, IMHO, we just keep moving the rawhide work forward for now. If it turns out everything works super well, perhaps we can look at a freeze break for f40...
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:43:01
that's why I wanted to bring it up, because with limited capacity i'm not very inclined to do it for branched version and break everything (my pov)
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:43:45
Should I write comment in there ?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:44:01
if you like, sure!
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:44:06
something like: We will work on rawhide and if ready will merge to f40?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:44:14
yep
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:44:48
shall we move on? or more on this one?
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:45:21
that's all i can bring this again in next meeting
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:45:52
!releng 11726
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:45:54
**releng #11726** (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11726):**Enable kiwi plugin for koji **
● **Opened:** 4 months ago by davdunc
● **Last Updated:** 6 days ago
● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:46:24
so, with the koji upgrades last week I enabled the kiwi plugin. We need however to do a few more things, but we should just integrate them into our usual flow...
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:47:03
namely: we need to make a kiwi-build koji group and we need to make new tags for it to build in, because it needs old_chroot
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:47:54
I guess f41-kiwi-build ? with f41-kiwi target for it?
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:48:47
naming convention seems uniform to me, this is something similar to flatpak s also so makes sense
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:48:52
Then 'koji add-group f41-kiwi-build kiwi-build' and 'koji add-group-pkg f41-kiwi-build kiwi-build kiwi-cli kiwi-systemdep'
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:49:31
cool. Can you add it to the scripts? and can you just create it, or did you want me to? (we also need f40 for this)
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:50:12
I can create pr by eow for you to review if that seems fine we can merge it?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:50:22
sounds great!
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:50:30
once we have it merged i can create them
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:50:41
note that the f40 change is likely needing pungi config too. I am not sure what that is yet.
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:50:49
okay so its 11:30 pm and there are monkeys in my front area screaming
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:50:58
but then it should all just work. ;)
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:50:59
okay so its 11:20 pm and there are monkeys in my front area screaming
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:51:10
ick. Don't they sleep too?
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:51:29
I'll look at it tomorrow first thing, and will discuss more tomorrow with ya
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:51:59
I have one more...
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:52:04
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266096
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:52:15
looks like we didn't enable updates-testing at branching right. ;(
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:52:29
hm
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:52:44
this is done by the variables in fedora-repos
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:52:59
(and as a side note, perhaps we should reassign primary admin on fedora-repos? I don't think mohan is going to care much)
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:53:06
or release?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:53:57
%global updates_testing_enabled 0
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:54:04
yeah
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:54:10
oh wait... wrong branch
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:54:12
ah :( apologies for missing it
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:54:28
oh yeah, it's that way on 40 too.
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:54:33
yep
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:54:37
its disabled in both
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:54:41
no worries... so many small moving parts. ;(
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:54:58
we should make sure and add it to the checklist of things to check.
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:55:09
it was there
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:55:20
ok. ;(
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:55:27
but this happens
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:55:29
anyhow, if you like I can fix it today, or leave it for you all...
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:55:48
jnsamyak: just need to get into the machine bit deeper :D
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:56:08
yep can you enable it now please
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:56:15
I'll keep that in mind
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:56:57
sure.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:57:09
I probibly had other things, but I can't remember them and we are out of time anyhow. ;)
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:57:29
so I have blocked the retirement packages from koji
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:57:31
oh, the koji db is still seeing load spikes, but it's mostly ok now...
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:57:34
but there is something weird
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:57:51
one of the packages does not even have f40 branch in pdc
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:58:01
there was a index change in the update that caused some really common queries to no longer use an index. So it was unusable until we added that back
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:58:28
never branched at branching time?
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:58:31
oh I heard interesting thing about postgresql at fosdem from one of the devs
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:58:45
i just have one more if patrikp is around, are there any blockers for this one?
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:58:46
11955
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
17:58:53
!releng 11955
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
17:58:54
**releng #11955** (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11955):** Please send openh264 2.4.1 builds to Cisco**
● **Opened:** a week ago by kalev
● **Last Updated:** a week ago
● **Assignee:** patrikp
<@humaton:fedora.im>
17:58:58
did you know that you can gain free performance by aligning the block size on FS to the size used by PSQl?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
17:59:30
heh. nice.
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
18:00:31
and we are out of time :)
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
18:01:10
if we have something more urgent, we can take that to our releng channel i guess!
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
18:01:36
thanks jnsamyak. Hope the monkeys shut up so you can get some sleep. ;)
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
18:01:40
!info Thank you all for coming.
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
18:01:48
nirik: they are still there i guess 5-10
<@jnsamyak:matrix.org>
18:01:53
!endmeeting