14:31:06 #startmeeting rolekit (2016-01-19) 14:31:06 Meeting started Tue Jan 19 14:31:06 2016 UTC. The chair is sgallagh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:31:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:31:06 The meeting name has been set to 'rolekit_(2016-01-19)' 14:31:07 #meetingname rolekitweekly 14:31:07 The meeting name has been set to 'rolekitweekly' 14:31:07 #chair sgallagh twoerner nilsph 14:31:07 #topic init process 14:31:07 Current chairs: nilsph sgallagh twoerner 14:31:17 .hello nphilipp 14:31:18 .hello sgallagh 14:31:18 nils: nphilipp 'Nils Philippsen' 14:31:21 sgallagh: sgallagh 'Stephen Gallagher' 14:32:05 .hello twoerner 14:32:06 twoerner: twoerner 'Thomas Woerner' 14:32:16 #topic Status Update 14:32:41 So, as discussed previously, we're in the process of ramping down heavy development on rolekit. 14:32:59 The last remaining high-importance task is on nils' shoulders: the refactoring of role definition plugins. 14:33:05 nils: How's it going? :) 14:34:07 yeah and I don't have anything working to show around yet, just a minor detail I'd like to change regarding the example I showed you guys last time, i.e. I think I can get away with having one type for all kinds of properties/settings 14:34:52 Oh? 14:35:08 hmm 14:35:14 Meaning: same RoleParam (or RoleSetting) for internal, unchangeable stuff like version, for configurable stuff like Thomas's firewall stuff and even for transient state like, uhm, the instance state 14:35:59 and the differences are handled through setting it on the constructor 14:36:12 Seems straightforward enough 14:36:14 e.g. "readonly=True", "const=True" 14:36:16 yeah 14:36:43 I first thought to have different types to differentiate that, but now don't see a need for that 14:37:12 Yeah, probably will reduce end-user confusion too 14:37:31 And all documentation is in one place. 14:38:37 Seems sensible to me. 14:38:50 there is then only a need for an external or internal flag 14:38:51 good 14:38:54 yes 14:39:00 +1 14:39:14 for the change 14:39:30 As far as progress, how far along are you? Does it seem realistic to aim for a release by the end of February? 14:40:11 I hope to have a first workable version ready by then, hopefully some days sooner so Thomas can have a go at it. 14:40:30 twoerner: when are you leaving for vacation? 14:40:31 that would be great as I am leaving at the 5th 14:40:40 Cool. (Yeah, by "release" I meant functional, not necessarily bug-free :) ) 14:40:48 So an Alpha 14:41:01 twoerner: the 5th of March? 14:41:03 Nothing non-trivial from me was ever bug-free :) 14:41:11 The Ides of March. 14:41:12 sgallagh: no.. 5th or February 14:41:16 nils: This is not unique to you 14:41:20 I know. 14:41:31 I'm a special snowflake in other ways. 14:41:47 no knifes needed for now :-) 14:42:50 that's it from me 14:44:04 nils: Thanks, much appreciated. 14:44:26 twoerner: I assume you're mostly waiting on nils to provide an API before dabbling in the firewall piece? 14:45:00 sgallagh: yes 14:45:31 I've not had any time for rolekit myself this past week 14:45:53 But I'll be available for any code reviews 14:47:19 #topic Open Floor 14:47:24 Any general comments? 14:47:45 not from me 14:47:55 not form me wither 14:47:57 I don't have anything (as I said, kinda swamped today) 14:47:57 either 14:48:07 Woo, short meeting! ;-) 14:48:16 OK, have a nice day. 14:48:27 #endmeeting