14:01:27 #startmeeting Sway SIG (2022-10-19) 14:01:27 Meeting started Wed Oct 19 14:01:27 2022 UTC. 14:01:27 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 14:01:27 The chair is alebastr[m]. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 14:01:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:01:27 The meeting name has been set to 'sway_sig_(2022-10-19)' 14:01:45 hi, I have a collision with other meetings in work 14:02:09 but I'll try to be here too 14:02:10 .hi jkonecny 14:02:11 jkonecny[m]: Sorry, but user 'jkonecny [m]' does not exist 14:02:20 .hello alebastr 14:02:21 alebastr[m]: alebastr 'Aleksei Bavshin' 14:02:26 .hello anthr76 14:02:26 .hello jkonecny 14:02:26 anthr76[m]: anthr76 'Anthony Rabbito' 14:02:29 jkonecny[m]: jkonecny 'Jiล™รญ Koneฤnรฝ' 14:03:01 there's a bit of lag on the irc bridge so zodbot responses will be delayed 14:04:31 #topic meeting time 14:05:45 I realized that US is moving on winter time soon and the meeting after the next will be at 6am my local time 14:06:19 Shall we do one of those survey things again? 14:06:20 Or should we just bump an hour or two 14:09:24 Falejkonecny wdyt? 14:15:28 I'm ok pushing the meeting 1hr 14:15:50 Also in a couple of weeks Europe will move 1hr as well 14:17:00 yep. the next meeting will be winter time EU/summer time US, which is fun 14:20:12 meanwhile... anthr76, have you seen https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModernizeLiveMedia? 14:22:49 I have not. I'm still getting quite back up to speed after being away for a week. 14:23:16 So it looks like we might want to take in this repo https://pagure.io/livesys-scripts/blob/main/f/libexec/livesys/sessions.d to our gitlab so we can work on this 14:24:09 kickstarts will work for now, but the solution we send to upstream fedora repos should be there, yes 14:26:21 Sounds good. Doesn't look too bad 14:27:14 This ticket seems to have light movement since i last checked it https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/334 14:28:35 sounds good to me 14:28:46 another meeting is before me in a 2 minutes 14:28:50 so moving it sounds great ๐Ÿ™‚ 14:29:25 the meeting is basically about the change you just send ๐Ÿ˜„ 14:30:02 The Live Media Modernization shouldn't have an impact AFAIK, it seems to be a nice addition 14:30:11 I don't think it will change build solution yet 14:30:18 hm. but if we move it +1h utc the conflicts with your meetings will remain after switching to winter time, right? 14:30:54 ohh it's not about moving this one meeting but completely 14:31:04 yeah time is switching here an hour back 14:31:58 sorry have the second meeting 14:32:31 but in general it's hard for me, I have meetings most of the afternoon 14:32:37 for me Thursday would be better suited 14:32:41 We can do one of those surveys again? 14:32:58 We are all quite spread out in TZs IIRC 14:33:31 jkonecny: Thursday morning is our team meetings :( 14:33:41 yeah, it's hard with me 14:34:32 I'm +1 for survey about the availability 14:34:49 Since it's a small crowd usually it would be nice to get the most out of everyone's time 14:35:01 Not sure if that's even possible but we can at least try :) 14:35:16 ๐Ÿ˜„ 14:35:37 insane scheduling starts to be my day job ๐Ÿ˜„ 14:38:04 ok, let's do another survey 14:39:30 #action alebastr to send a new meeting time survey 14:40:01 #topic Open Floor 14:40:39 I'm a bit tied up at work today though today I do plan to submit the change proposal 14:41:09 I have made attempts at a waybar config but I just caved in and realized im not the right tool for the job :) 14:41:46 btw, there will be breaking changes in styles for the next waybar release 14:44:07 Overall, the list of changes for the next release looks scary. But that's normal with waybar :( 14:44:47 * anthr76[m] haven't yet really followed waybar development but is now reading some commits 14:46:16 anthr76: what about your file managers investigation? 14:47:00 dngray: has opened me up to nautilus so I've been using it while traveling. 14:47:13 I do plan to still write something in the ticket hopefully today or tomorrow regarding it 14:47:34 But overall I think it boils down to nautilus or thunar 14:49:18 hopefully nautilus, because it is a better product lol 14:50:50 I'm apprehensive of using GNOME components because those are not meant to be used outside of the GNOME ecosystem 14:51:28 +1 to that, but it seemed not add a major footprint into our spin. I need to revist though what the foot print actually looks like.. 14:54:50 * anthr76[m] sent a code block: https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/7bf1d03840a6b611ab905c5acbb65be59a2c9546 14:55:19 Eh that a bit more then I think dngray was selling me on 14:55:29 * me on :) 14:55:49 anthr76[m]: nautilus includes a lot of the same dependencies 14:56:01 at least it doesn't require gnome-shell 14:56:11 What are `gnome-desktop*` ? 14:56:11 s/nautilus/thunar/ 14:56:18 oh that package is super small 14:56:21 This is thunar:... (full message at ) 14:56:32 if you look at the disk space of gnome-desktop 14:57:03 the other thing is 14:57:10 the gnome deps are likely to be used by other things 14:57:28 but i will bet you those thunar deps will never be used by anything but thunar apps 14:57:31 like xfcon, exo etc 14:57:44 and the X11 dependencies 14:57:53 hmm 14:57:53 i think the main reason why i was pro nautilus is because it was wayland native 14:57:56 and didn't install that old crap 14:58:03 also you notice thunar installs gvfs anyway 14:58:35 I do agree with that sentiment and for the most part it doesn't feel very gtk-y but you know it still does 14:58:46 Honestly I like PCManFM idk why 14:59:00 * idk why. The UX to it 14:59:04 i think pcmanfm is a bad choice because it follows no HIG standards 14:59:12 feels clunky, and honestly feels like it is unmaintained 14:59:50 btw 14:59:50 627K Oct 20 01:29 gnome-desktop3-43-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm 14:59:51 its super small 14:59:51 gnome is actually quite modular 15:00:38 150K Oct 20 01:30 gnome-desktop4-43-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm 15:01:48 I'm going to stop the meeting if we don't have anything else. But feel free to continue outside of the meeting :) 15:01:58 also i'd argue the QA on nautilus is probably more stringent 15:02:23 +1 15:02:24 alebastr[m]: oh i didn't realise there was one lol 15:02:57 dngray: one problem is that it's strictly GNOME QA. and there's no promises to support any of the "modular" components outside of the GNOME :( 15:03:28 well i think until something better comes along 15:03:47 i think xfce is going to have proper wayland support in 4.18 15:04:09 https://www.phoronix.com/news/Xfce-4.18-Planning-Begins 15:04:15 https://wiki.xfce.org/releng/4.18/roadmap 15:04:26 #stopmeeting 15:04:40 #endmeeting