<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:00:50
!startmeeting EPEL (2024-06-12)
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
18:00:51
Meeting started at 2024-06-12 18:00:50 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
18:00:51
The Meeting name is 'EPEL (2024-06-12)'
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:00:56
!meetingname epel
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
18:00:56
The Meeting Name is now epel
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:01:01
!topic aloha
<@pgreco:fedora.im>
18:01:15
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:01:16
Pablo Sebastian Greco (pgreco)
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:01:37
Hi Pablo Greco
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
18:02:30
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:02:32
Neil Hanlon (neil) - he / him / his
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:02:56
Hi Neil Hanlon
<@rcallicotte:fedora.im>
18:02:58
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:02:59
Robby Callicotte (rcallicotte) - he / him / his
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:03:05
Hi Robby Callicotte
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:03:35
EPEL stuff seems a little slow this past week.
<@rcallicotte:fedora.im>
18:03:54
anticipation for epel10 :)
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:03:56
On the matrix channel, there was nothing between last weeks meeting announcement, and this weeks.
<@smooge:fedora.im>
18:04:07
hello
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:04:14
Hello Stephen J Smoogen
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:15
!topic End Of Life (EOL)
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:23
CentOS Stream 8 / epel-8-next went EOL on 2024-05-31
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:23
RHEL 7 / epel-7 will go EOL on 2024-06-30
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:23
https://endoflife.date/rhel
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:23
CentOS Stream 9 / epel-9-next goes EOL in 2027-05-31
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:23
https://endoflife.date/centos-stream
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:06:03
Looking at the ticket for the epel8-next retirement, it looks like almost everything is done - https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12147
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:06:49
But, it's not marked as closed ... so ... still some work to do.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:07:08
I suppose epel7 will be similar stuff.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:07:36
But, nobody who is working on it is here, so .... moving on.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:07:46
!topic EPEL Issues https://pagure.io/epel/issues
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:07:50
https://pagure.io/epel/issues?tags=meeting&status=Open
<@carlwgeorge:matrix.org>
18:08:42
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:08:44
Carl George (carlwgeorge) - he / him / his
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:08:47
The only thing there is #278, but I don't see Carl George here today ....
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:08:49
Ha!!
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:08:53
Hi Carl George
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
18:09:03
i said i would work on a PR for mirrormanager config to support this; but haven't got to it yet. iirc, we agreed we think it's worthwhile but no one has time to commit to it :D
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:09:13
https://pagure.io/epel/issue/278
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:09:28
Neil Hanlon: Ah, that's right.
<@carlwgeorge:matrix.org>
18:10:14
Adrian already has the implementation ready to go, he's just waiting on the go ahead from us
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
18:10:30
ah, perfect
<@carlwgeorge:matrix.org>
18:11:02
Anyone have concerns or questions on this one before we vote?
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:11:07
Cool
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
18:11:22
Not me. I'm looking forward to it for EPEL 10 :)
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:12:01
No concerns from me. Like Neil, I think this will be a good "warm up" for doing things for 10.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:12:47
It might also help with the "not quite in sync" stuff we have at each release.
<@dherrera:fedora.im>
18:13:02
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:13:03
Diego Herrera (dherrera) - he / him / his
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:13:10
Hi Diego Herrera
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:14:30
If nobody has any concerns at the meeting, and nobody had any concerns during the past week, let's vote on it.
<@carlwgeorge:matrix.org>
18:15:15
+1 for my own proposal 😛
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:15:23
+1
<@rcallicotte:fedora.im>
18:15:32
+1
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
18:15:37
+1 on the proposal; -1 on carl's self +1 just to be a pain
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:16:16
I figure, if the person who proposed it didn't give it a +1 ... there isn't much chance of it passing. :)
<@rcallicotte:fedora.im>
18:16:28
lol
<@pgreco:fedora.im>
18:16:55
let's formally do the +1
<@pgreco:fedora.im>
18:17:07
if those who have to do it are ok, more than fine with me
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:17:27
We're a little light on committee members here this week, but last week when people were here, nobody had anything against it, other than the time it would take.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:20:22
Sorry for being quiet, but I'm looking through the new voting policy, as well as the issue. I believe this is NOT a policy change, so doesn't have to have 51% of committee members approve.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:20:48
The problem is that this week, there are only two committee members here.
<@carlwgeorge:matrix.org>
18:21:14
i can ping them after the meeting and ask them to drop votes in the ticket, and not proceed till it hits 51%
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:22:03
Sounds good. I'm not sure if it's a "policy change" or not, so it's a little fuzzy.
<@pgreco:fedora.im>
18:22:55
I don't think there's anything rushing this, people are already working on it in the background
<@pgreco:fedora.im>
18:23:00
and we know it will pass
<@nhanlon:beeper.com>
18:23:07
agreed
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:23:07
Yep.
<@pgreco:fedora.im>
18:23:10
we can wait a bit and deal with the formalities "formally"
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:23:39
Anything else before we move on?
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:24:16
!topic Old Business
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:24:29
Does anyone have any Old Business to bring up this week?
<@rcallicotte:fedora.im>
18:25:10
emacs vs vim... jk jk no old business from me.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:25:26
Wow ... that's even older than Smooge. :)
<@rcallicotte:fedora.im>
18:25:37
lol
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:25:51
I'm going to move on to Open Floor
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:26:01
!endmeeting