#fedora-blocker-review: F26-blocker-review

Meeting summary

1. Roll Call (roshi, 16:02:07)
   
2. Introduction (roshi, 16:03:44)
   1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (roshi, 16:03:45)
   2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (roshi, 16:03:48)
   3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (roshi, 16:03:51)
   4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (roshi, 16:03:54)
   5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (roshi, 16:03:56)
   6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (roshi, 16:03:58)
   7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Alpha_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:04:01)
   8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Beta_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:04:04)
   9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Final_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:04:07)
   10. https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/92878 is another case, for instance (adamw, 16:27:31)
   11. https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/92878/file/video.ogv (adamw, 16:27:38)
   12. kohane raised several issues for discussion, we see some potential FEs and we are concerned about intermittent failure of KDE to start properly, will continue to investigate that and try to spot a common pattern in logs (adamw, 16:34:36)
   13. we still do not have sufficient information on the outstanding proposed FE to make a decision on it (adamw, 16:35:07)
   
   
3. Open Floor (roshi, 16:38:41)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (58)
2. Kohane (51)
3. roshi (43)
4. zodbot (8)
5. sgallagh (6)
6. alexpl (4)
7. satellit (2)
8. pschindl_wfh (1)
9. kparal (1)
10. alciregi (1)
11. hdost (1)
12. pwhalen (0)