#fedora-blocker-review: F35-blocker-review
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:31 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (adamw, 16:00:32)
- Introduction (adamw, 16:10:31)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw,
16:10:49)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (adamw,
16:10:50)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw,
16:10:50)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (adamw,
16:10:52)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(adamw,
16:10:57)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (adamw,
16:11:02)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:11:06)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:11:11)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:11:16)
- for Beta, we have: (adamw,
16:11:24)
- 1 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
16:11:33)
- 3 Accepted Blockers (adamw,
16:11:40)
- 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
16:11:45)
- 6 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
16:11:46)
- for Final, we have: (adamw,
16:11:58)
- 6 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
16:12:01)
- 2 Accepted Blockers (adamw,
16:12:04)
- 1 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
16:12:07)
- coremodule will secretarialize (adamw,
16:12:19)
- Proposed Beta blocker (adamw, 16:13:04)
- (2005625) Very slow to proceed past password page in initial setup (adamw, 16:13:16)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005625
(adamw,
16:13:19)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/463
(adamw,
16:13:24)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-initial-setup,
NEW (adamw,
16:13:31)
- Ticket vote: BetaBlocker (+0,0,-4) (-kparal,
-frantisekz, -bcotton, -geraldosimiao) (adamw,
16:13:32)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+4,0,-0) (+kparal,
+frantisekz, +bcotton, +geraldosimiao) (adamw,
16:13:34)
- Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+4,0,-0)
(+kparal, +frantisekz, +bcotton, +geraldosimiao) (adamw,
16:13:38)
- AGREED: 2005625 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) AcceptedBlocker (Final)
AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is accepted as a Final blocker
as a conditional violation of criterion "A working mechanism to
create a user account must be clearly presented during installation
and/or first boot of the installed system." We don't think it's bad
enough to block Beta, but it is bad enough to warrant a freeze
exception (adamw,
16:26:08)
- Proposed Final blockers (adamw, 16:27:02)
- 2005625 was the only proposed Beta FE and we
covered it, so moving onto Final. (adamw,
16:27:16)
- (2004565) The default keyring is created with an unknown password, can't be unlocked (adamw, 16:29:06)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2004565
(adamw,
16:29:06)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/460
(adamw,
16:29:09)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-initial-setup,
NEW (adamw,
16:29:15)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,0,-0) (+kparal,
+geraldosimiao, +catanzaro) (adamw,
16:29:18)
- AGREED: 2004565 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - we believe this has the same cause as
2005625, but there's no harm in accepting it separately in case it
doesn't. accepted as a violation of "All applications that can be
launched using the standard graphical mechanism after a default
installation of Fedora Workstation on the x86_64 architecture must
start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test."
(adamw,
16:36:22)
- (1950669) [abrt] gnome-settings-daemon: get_current_screen_saver_status(): gsd-usb-protection killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 16:36:47)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950669
(adamw,
16:36:50)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/412
(adamw,
16:37:03)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-settings-daemon,
NEW (adamw,
16:37:03)
- AGREED: 1950669 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) - we believe at this point other bugs have
been fixed such that this crash will not usually be encountered, and
so there is no need for it to be a blocker or FE issue. (adamw,
16:46:53)
- (2004604) a removed package looks still installed in gnome-software, can't be installed again until reboot (adamw, 16:47:02)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2004604
(adamw,
16:47:08)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/457
(adamw,
16:47:13)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW
(adamw,
16:47:19)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,1,-0) (+kparal,
+catanzaro, +geraldosimiao, sgallagh) (adamw,
16:47:27)
- AGREED: 2004604 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a conditional
violation of "The installed system must be able appropriately to
install, remove, and update software with the default tool for the
relevant software type in all release-blocking desktops", in the
case of trying to reinstall a previously removed package
(adamw,
16:54:49)
- (2005343) System repositories can be disabled by clicking on the row (adamw, 16:55:00)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005343
(adamw,
16:55:04)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/461
(adamw,
16:55:16)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW
(adamw,
16:55:17)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+1,0,-0)
(+geraldosimiao) (adamw,
16:55:20)
- AGREED: 2005343 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) - this seems like an unfortunate behaviour
and it'd be good to fix it, but it's not really serious enough to
violate the "basic functionality" criterion or any others
(adamw,
17:02:41)
- (1995439) cannot run F34 or F33 toolboxes in F35 or C9S: Error: invalid entry point PID of container (adamw, 17:02:47)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1995439
(adamw,
17:02:59)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/447
(adamw,
17:02:59)
- Proposed Blocker, toolbox, NEW (adamw,
17:03:05)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-2) (-kparal,
-geraldosimiao) (adamw,
17:03:16)
- AGREED: 1995439 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) - this does not violate any criteria. it's
significant primarily for user-facing ostree builds, and none of
those are prelease-blocking yet. (adamw,
17:13:42)
- Accepted Beta Blockers (adamw, 17:14:06)
- a reminder - we are checking status here, not
voting (unless we decide to re-vote one) (adamw,
17:14:19)
- (1999321) DNS often stops resolving properly after FreeIPA server upgrade to Fedora 35 or 36 (adamw, 17:14:41)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999321
(adamw,
17:14:46)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/419
(adamw,
17:15:04)
- Accepted Blocker, freeipa, NEW (adamw,
17:15:05)
- we are currently working to try and establish
the parameters of this issue, and whether it is specific to fedora
infra's network environment. (adamw,
17:17:38)
- (2000756) error: ../../grub-core/loader/arm64/linux.c:326:Invalid PE optional header magic. (adamw, 17:19:27)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000756
(adamw,
17:19:34)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/464
(adamw,
17:19:38)
- Accepted Blocker, grub2, ON_QA (adamw,
17:19:45)
- fix for this is in the queue, so shouldn't be
any problems there (adamw,
17:19:52)
- (1989726) [abrt] gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 17:20:26)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989726
(adamw,
17:20:33)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/399
(adamw,
17:20:38)
- Accepted Blocker, mesa, NEW (adamw,
17:20:41)
- from discussion in the bug, Karol (who's taking
care of it) says there's potentially a way to address it but it's
not trivial. I gave him the timeframe we're working with in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989726#c40 (adamw,
17:21:38)
- Open floor (adamw, 17:23:19)
- please check
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/35/ for tests at
Basic or Beta milestone that have not been run recently and help run
them! (adamw,
17:24:59)
Meeting ended at 17:30:48 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- adamw (169)
- bcotton (28)
- frantisekz (21)
- geraldosimiao (17)
- pwhalen (17)
- zodbot (16)
- coremodule (6)
Generated by MeetBot 0.3.