#fedora-qa: f18beta-blocker-review-5

Meeting started by tflink at 16:01:09 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (tflink, 16:01:09)
  2. Introduction (tflink, 16:06:14)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (tflink, 16:06:22)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:06:32)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 16:06:32)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:06:39)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 16:06:39)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink, 16:06:49)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:06:49)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Beta_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:06:49)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Final_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:06:49)
    10. 7 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:07:06)
    11. 8 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:07:06)
    12. 0 Proposed NTH (tflink, 16:07:06)
    13. 12 Accepted NTH (tflink, 16:07:06)

  3. (868519) LUKS passphrase exposed in /root/anaconda-ks.cfg (tflink, 16:07:59)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868519 (tflink, 16:07:59)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 16:07:59)
    3. AGREED: it's agreed in principle that security issues above a certain severity level (to be decided) not fixable by an update must be resolved before final release (adamw, 16:32:58)
    4. AGREED: 868519 - RejectedBlocker (beta), AcceptedNTH (beta), AcceptedBlocker (final) - This does not violate any F18 beta release criteria and is thus rejected as a blocker for F18. Following the agreement above, this is provisionally accepted as a blocker for F18 final and NTH for F18 beta. (tflink, 16:34:27)

  4. (848764) default mediacheck on 18 Alpha RC2 discs does not work (tflink, 16:34:39)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848764 (tflink, 16:34:40)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (tflink, 16:34:40)
    3. AGREED: 848764 - RejectedBlocker(beta), AcceptedNTH(beta), AcceptedBlocker(Final) - This doesn't violate any criteria for F18 beta and is rejected as a blocker. However, it does violate the following F18 final criterion and thus is accepted as beta NTH and final blocker: "If there is an embedded checksum in the image, it must match. If there is a related UI element displayed after booting the image, it must work and display the correct result" (tflink, 16:41:47)

  5. (858801) [zh_TW] Please add Chinese (Taiwan) language to language selection menu in anaconda (tflink, 16:41:54)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858801 (tflink, 16:41:57)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (tflink, 16:41:59)
    3. AGREED: 858801 - RejectedBlocker (beta), AcceptedNTH (beta) - There are no translation requirements for beta and this is rejected as a blocker for beta. However, a tested patch would be accepted after beta freeze to add traditional chinese. Please re-propose as a final blocker for later review (tflink, 16:53:52)

  6. (862784) newUI custom partitioning does not allow formatting of an existing partition for use in the installed system (tflink, 16:54:30)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862784 (tflink, 16:54:33)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 16:54:35)
    3. AGREED: 862784 - RejectedBlocker (beta) - This doesn't violate any of the F18 beta release requirements, seems unlikely to hit any proposed revisions and has several reasonable workarounds. (tflink, 17:02:13)

  7. (868777) fail to install the system use vnc (tflink, 17:02:22)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868777 (tflink, 17:02:22)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 17:02:22)
    3. AGREED: 868777 - RejectedBlocker (beta) - Since this seems to only affect VNC installs with media and dhcp, there are several workable workarounds and it was decided that this is not a blocker for f18 beta. (tflink, 17:08:08)

  8. (869091) Gnome fails to install in TC6 Beta netinstall (tflink, 17:08:14)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869091 (tflink, 17:08:14)
    2. Proposed Blocker, distribution, NEW (tflink, 17:08:14)
    3. AGREED: 869091 does not seem to be reproducible by anyone else, others have run successful GNOME netinstalls with TC6, and the reporter has provided no data to diagnose the issue. Bug will be closed as WORKSFORME, reporter can re-open if he can reproduce and provide data (adamw, 17:34:10)

  9. (867118) limit bugzilla summary to 255 chars (tflink, 18:09:38)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867118 (tflink, 18:09:38)
    2. Proposed Blocker, libreport, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:09:39)
    3. AGREED: 867118 - RejectedBlocker, AcceptedNTH - This doesn't seem to prevent enough bug reports to justify taking as a blocker. However, it could affect bug reporting in the installer and a well tested fix would be accepted past freeze. (tflink, 18:15:44)

  10. (863348) ValueError: Cannot remove non-leaf device 'vda2' (tflink, 18:16:48)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863348 (tflink, 18:16:48)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, POST (tflink, 18:16:48)
    3. a fix for this was included in anaconda-18.17-1 (tflink, 18:21:03)
    4. request re-testing and close as verified when fixed (tflink, 18:21:15)

  11. (866519) BIOS RAID is not shown on harddrive screen (tflink, 18:22:33)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866519 (tflink, 18:22:33)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 18:22:33)
    3. no movement on this since last reviewed 2 days ago (tflink, 18:23:07)
    4. waiting for info and/or a fix from anaconda devs (tflink, 18:24:05)

  12. (866115) ValueError: ('invalid size specification', '0 b') (tflink, 18:24:19)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866115 (tflink, 18:24:19)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:24:20)
    3. fix for this should be in anaconda-18.20-1 (tflink, 18:26:35)
    4. test when the new build is available, add reports to bug (tflink, 18:26:53)

  13. (862613) ValueError: cannot initialize a disk that has partitions (tflink, 18:27:09)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862613 (tflink, 18:27:10)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 18:27:10)
    3. doesn't appear to have been fixed yet (tflink, 18:28:43)
    4. waiting for request for more information or a fix to test (tflink, 18:29:17)

  14. (863451) AttributeError: 'DeviceFormat' object has no attribute 'peStart' (tflink, 18:29:49)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863451 (tflink, 18:29:52)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 18:29:54)
    3. no movement on this since last week, still waiting for attention from anaconda devs (tflink, 18:30:24)

  15. (855526) f18a tc6 anaconda cannot connect to a protected wireless network (tflink, 18:32:20)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855526 (tflink, 18:32:23)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 18:32:26)
    3. this doesn't appear to be completely fixed yet (tflink, 18:33:54)
    4. waiting to see how anaconda devs want to handle the bug - split it or keep it as one bug (tflink, 18:34:46)

  16. (867071) NameError: global name 'anaconda' is not defined (tflink, 18:35:41)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867071 (tflink, 18:35:42)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:35:42)
    3. this appears to have been fixed in recent anaconda builds and there have been no new reports on a bug that used to be easy to hit (tflink, 18:40:01)
    4. this can be closed (tflink, 18:40:35)

  17. (866486) Apper: cannot perform system update (tflink, 18:41:43)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866486 (tflink, 18:41:43)
    2. Accepted Blocker, apper, ASSIGNED (tflink, 18:41:43)
    3. progress has been made on this - it works when updates are set to never but doesn't work for the default install (tflink, 18:42:28)
    4. dialoge between testers and devs is taking place, waiting for a new fix (tflink, 18:42:47)
    5. more testing would be useful to confirm the findings stated in the bug (tflink, 18:44:43)

  18. Open Floor (tflink, 18:45:54)
    1. the next blocker review meeting will be 2012-10-31 @ 16:00 UTC (tflink, 18:47:48)


Meeting ended at 18:50:54 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. tflink (220)
  2. adamw (154)
  3. cmurf (90)
  4. akshayvyas (16)
  5. jreznik (14)
  6. zodbot (11)
  7. nirik (9)
  8. kparal (6)
  9. satellit (4)
  10. jmoskovc (1)
  11. jreznik_ (1)
  12. Southern_Gentlem (1)
  13. dreamreal (1)
  14. satellit_e (1)
  15. weld (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.