#fedora-meeting-3: Weekly Meeting of the Modularity Working Group

Meeting summary

1. Roll Call (nils, 15:04:39)
   
2. Agenda (nils, 15:05:33)
   1. [asamalik] Module lifecycles (nils, 15:06:14)
   2. [asamalik] Stream default changes & Fedora Changes (nils, 15:06:27)
   3. [asamalik] Stream branch ownership for packages & modules (nils, 15:06:50)
   4. [ignatenkobrain/sgallagh] How do we keep rawhide sane? (re: forcing people to latest modules) (nils, 15:07:33)
   
   
3. Module lifecycles (nils, 15:08:17)
   1. https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/112 (asamalik, 15:08:35)
   2. This is a follow-up of a recent (well, a month ago?) threads on the Devel list about how we define and manage module lifecycles, containing a proposal and input from those threads in it (asamalik, 15:10:02)
   
   
4. Stream default changes & Fedora Changes (nils, 15:14:48)
   1. https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/114 (nils, 15:15:40)
   2. Likely the least complex topic of the four we have today. I have a very short proposal there, already two +1's from bcotton and sgallagh (asamalik, 15:16:11)
   3. we'll give it more time for people to give their +1's and -1's on this one (asamalik, 15:25:14)
   
   
5. Stream branch ownership for packages & modules (nils, 15:25:54)
   1. https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/115 (nils, 15:26:03)
   2. A specific proposal regarding stream branch ownership. Already includes some input from recent (a month ago?) discussion about managing module lifecycles on the Devel list. (asamalik, 15:26:59)
   
   
6. How do we keep rawhide sane? (re: forcing people to latest modules) (reprise) (nils, 15:44:15)
   1. https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/108 (nils, 15:44:37)
   2. we'll continue the discussion in the ticket (asamalik, 15:51:35)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. asamalik (73)
2. nils (44)
3. zodbot (19)
4. langdon (18)
5. contyk (12)
6. sgallagh (6)
7. ignatenkobrain (2)
8. bcotton (2)
9. mikedep333 (0)